Suppr超能文献

如何评估医疗保健专业人员的终身学习技能:关于测量终身学习的工具内容和质量的系统评价

How to evaluate lifelong learning skills of healthcare professionals: a systematic review on content and quality of instruments for measuring lifelong learning.

作者信息

Verkooijen Monica H M, van Tuijl Anne A C, Calsbeek Hiske, Fluit Cornelia R M G, van Gurp Petra J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Learning and Innovation Centre, Avans University of Applied Sciences, Breda, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):1423. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06335-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Having lifelong learning skills is a necessity for healthcare professionals. To evaluate these skills, sound instruments are needed. Those working in healthcare of medical educating looking for a suitable instrument to evaluate lifelong learning (LLL) skills in healthcare professionals are faced with a multitude of definitions and operationalizations of the concept of LLL. A systematic review was performed to analyze the methodological quality and content of instruments measuring LLL for professionals.

METHODS

A systematic search of literature published until October 2023 in the electronic databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, Sociological Abstracts, EMBASE, and Web of Science was conducted. English articles describing the development, validation or use of an instrument measuring lifelong learning for professionals working in a professional context were included. A data extraction form was developed to evaluate the content and methodological quality of the instruments. The STORIES statement was used to support reporting this review.

RESULTS

The search revealed 85 articles on 18 questionnaires, no qualitative instruments were found. The instruments covered a range of settings, for example the Jefferson Scale of Physician LLL (JSPLL) covered healthcare and the Effective LLL Inventory (ELLI) covered education. Most instruments provided evidence on content validity and internal consistency, other aspects of validity were examined less frequently. Furthermore, the way that LLL was defined varied greatly, also great variety in the constructs that were defined in the instruments was found. Most instruments lacked a clear description of how the dimensions and items were formalized.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for LLL instruments that provide more evidence on their validity and put greater emphasis on the development of the definition and operationalization of LLL. Furthermore, there is a need for a better understanding of how to interpret and use the results of the instruments. It is recommended to take a critical look at these constructs before selecting an instrument. This will help all those involved in the training and working environment of healthcare professionals in evaluating lifelong learning skills in their context.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019134804.

摘要

背景

具备终身学习技能是医疗保健专业人员的必备条件。为了评估这些技能,需要可靠的工具。那些从事医学教育保健工作的人在寻找一种合适的工具来评估医疗保健专业人员的终身学习(LLL)技能时,面临着对LLL概念的众多定义和操作化方法。进行了一项系统综述,以分析测量专业人员LLL的工具的方法学质量和内容。

方法

对截至2023年10月在电子数据库MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、ERIC、Sociological Abstracts、EMBASE和Web of Science上发表的文献进行了系统检索。纳入了描述在专业背景下工作的专业人员终身学习测量工具的开发、验证或使用的英文文章。开发了一种数据提取表来评估工具的内容和方法学质量。使用STORIES声明来支持本综述的报告。

结果

检索发现了18份问卷的85篇文章,未找到定性工具。这些工具涵盖了一系列环境,例如杰斐逊医生终身学习量表(JSPLL)涵盖医疗保健领域,有效终身学习量表(ELLI)涵盖教育领域。大多数工具提供了内容效度和内部一致性的证据,效度的其他方面较少被检验。此外,LLL的定义方式差异很大,工具中定义的结构也有很大差异。大多数工具缺乏对维度和项目如何形式化的清晰描述。

结论

需要有能提供更多效度证据且更强调LLL定义和操作化发展的LLL工具。此外,需要更好地理解如何解释和使用这些工具的结果。建议在选择工具之前批判性地审视这些结构。这将有助于所有参与医疗保健专业人员培训和工作环境的人员在其背景下评估终身学习技能。

注册

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42019134804。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e03/11622499/35d8ebc23db0/12909_2024_6335_Figa_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验