Camarda Valentina, Sanderson Barnaby, Barrett Nicholas A, Collins Patrick Duncan, Garfield Benjamin, Gattinoni Luciano, Giosa Lorenzo, Hla Teddy Tun Win, Keogh Ruth H, Laidlaw Claire, Momigliano Francesca, Patel Brijesh V, Retter Andrew, Tomarchio Emilia, McAuley Daniel, Rose Louise, Camporota Luigi
Department of Critical Care Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Crit Care. 2024 Dec 5;28(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05177-7.
Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a supportive therapy for acute respiratory failure with increased risk of packed red blood cells (PRBC) transfusion. Blood cell salvage (BCS) aims to reduce blood transfusion, but its efficacy is unclear. This study aimed to estimate the effect of BCS at the time of removal of the ECMO circuit (ECMO decannulation) on PRBC transfused.
To compare BCS to non-blood cell salvage (n-BCS), we conducted an emulated trial of patients at two ECMO centres in the United Kingdom. We used inverse propensity of treatment weighting to control for confounding and estimated the average treatment effect of BCS on PRBC transfused within two days of decannulation, and on changes in haemoglobin (Hb).
We included 841 patients who underwent VV-ECMO decannulation. The estimated marginal mean number of PRBC transfused when using BCS was 0·2 (95%CI: 0·16, 0·25) units compared to 0·51 (95%CI: 0·44, 0·59) units with n-BCS; an average treatment effect of -0·31 (95%CI: -0·40, -0·22) units. BCS reduced the risk of receiving any PRBC transfusion by 17·1% (95%CI: 11·1%, 22·9%) equating to a number needed to treat for any PRBC transfusion of 6 (95%CI: 5, 9). The difference in expected Hb levels after decannulation between BCS and n-BCS was 5·0 (95%CI: 4·2, 5·8) g/L.
The use of BCS during VV-ECMO decannulation may be an effective strategy to augment haemoglobin levels and reduce PRBC transfusions.
静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合(VV-ECMO)是一种用于急性呼吸衰竭的支持性治疗方法,其红细胞(PRBC)输血风险增加。血细胞回收(BCS)旨在减少输血,但疗效尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估在移除体外膜肺氧合回路(ECMO拔管)时进行血细胞回收对PRBC输注的影响。
为了将血细胞回收与非血细胞回收(n-BCS)进行比较,我们在英国的两个ECMO中心对患者进行了模拟试验。我们使用治疗权重的逆倾向得分来控制混杂因素,并估计血细胞回收对拔管后两天内PRBC输注以及血红蛋白(Hb)变化的平均治疗效果。
我们纳入了841例行VV-ECMO拔管的患者。使用血细胞回收时估计的PRBC输注边际平均数为0.2(95%CI:0.16,0.25)单位,而n-BCS为0.51(95%CI:0.44,0.59)单位;平均治疗效果为-0.31(95%CI:-0.40,-0.22)单位。血细胞回收使接受任何PRBC输血的风险降低了17.1%(95%CI:11.1%,22.9%),相当于避免任何PRBC输血所需治疗人数为6(95%CI:5,9)。血细胞回收与n-BCS拔管后预期血红蛋白水平的差异为5.0(95%CI:4.2,5.8)g/L。
在VV-ECMO拔管期间使用血细胞回收可能是提高血红蛋白水平和减少PRBC输血的有效策略。