• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抑郁症住院患者随访评估的可靠性。

Reliability of follow-up assessments of depressed inpatients.

作者信息

Zimmerman M, Coryell W

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986 May;43(5):468-70. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800050074008.

DOI:10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800050074008
PMID:3964025
Abstract

Twenty-one depressed inpatients were followed up for six months after hospital admission. One rater assessed the patients at monthly intervals, and an independent rater assessed symptoms and treatment for the same period at the end of the six-month follow-up. Ratings of audiotapes of the monthly interviews by a third rater achieved excellent reliability. Fair to excellent agreement was also found between the monthly and six-month interviews. Reliability was lowest during the first month of the follow-up period. Unexpectedly, at the six-month interview more rather than fewer symptoms were reported for the most remote part of the follow-up interval. Our results suggest that at the six-month interview patients had reevaluated their functioning for the immediate postdischarge period.

摘要

21名住院抑郁症患者在入院后接受了为期6个月的随访。一名评估者每月对患者进行评估,另一名独立评估者在6个月随访结束时评估同期的症状和治疗情况。第三名评估者对每月访谈录音带的评分具有很高的可靠性。在每月访谈和6个月访谈之间也发现了中等至高度的一致性。随访期第一个月的可靠性最低。出乎意料的是,在6个月访谈中,随访间隔最远阶段报告的症状更多而非更少。我们的结果表明,在6个月访谈时,患者重新评估了出院后近期的功能状况。

相似文献

1
Reliability of follow-up assessments of depressed inpatients.抑郁症住院患者随访评估的可靠性。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986 May;43(5):468-70. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800050074008.
2
Prognostic validity of self-report and interview measures of personality disorder in depressed inpatients.住院抑郁症患者人格障碍自我报告与访谈测量的预后效度
J Clin Psychiatry. 1987 Dec;48(12):468-72.
3
The course of depressive symptoms in suicidal vs. nonsuicidal depressed inpatients.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1987 Aug;175(8):450-6. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198708000-00002.
4
Prognostic validity of the dexamethasone suppression test: results of a six-month prospective follow-up.地塞米松抑制试验的预后效度:六个月前瞻性随访结果
Am J Psychiatry. 1987 Feb;144(2):212-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.144.2.212.
5
Rating depression in schizophrenia. A comparison of a self-report and an observer report scale.精神分裂症中抑郁症状的评定:自我报告量表与观察者报告量表的比较
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1993 Sep;181(9):561-5.
6
A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.汉密尔顿抑郁量表的结构化访谈指南。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988 Aug;45(8):742-7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800320058007.
7
A psychometric investigation of the Daily Emotion Report in a sample of depressed inpatients.对一组住院抑郁症患者样本进行的《每日情绪报告》心理测量学调查。
J Clin Psychol. 2007 Sep;63(9):835-41. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20381.
8
Quantifying depressive symptomatology: inter-rater reliability and inter-item correlations.
J Affect Disord. 1990 Oct;20(2):143-9. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(90)90128-u.
9
Reliability and validity of the symptoms of major depressive illness.重度抑郁症症状的可靠性与有效性。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986 May;43(5):451-6. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800050053006.
10
Characterizing depression in borderline patients.边缘型人格障碍患者抑郁症状的特征分析
J Clin Psychiatry. 1987 Apr;48(4):155-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic validity of the familial subtypes of depression.抑郁症家族亚型的预后效度。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 1988;237(3):166-70. doi: 10.1007/BF00451285.