• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抑郁症家族亚型的预后效度。

Prognostic validity of the familial subtypes of depression.

作者信息

Zimmerman M, Coryell W, Pfohl B, Stangl D

机构信息

University of Iowa, Department of Psychiatry, Iowa City 52242.

出版信息

Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 1988;237(3):166-70. doi: 10.1007/BF00451285.

DOI:10.1007/BF00451285
PMID:3383922
Abstract

We examined the prognostic validity of Winokur's familial subtypes of depression in 184 in-patients with primary unipolar major depression. Patients with familial pure depressive disease had a more favorable hospital course and reported less symptoms during a 6-month follow-up evaluation than patients with depressive spectrum disease or sporadic depressive disease. Consistent with previous studies of the validity of the familial subtypes, the use of stringent thresholds to diagnose the patient's relatives increased the validity of classification.

摘要

我们对184例原发性单相重度抑郁症住院患者中Winokur抑郁症家族亚型的预后有效性进行了研究。与抑郁谱系疾病或散发性抑郁疾病患者相比,家族性单纯抑郁疾病患者在6个月的随访评估中病程更有利,症状报告更少。与先前关于家族亚型有效性的研究一致,使用严格阈值诊断患者亲属提高了分类的有效性。

相似文献

1
Prognostic validity of the familial subtypes of depression.抑郁症家族亚型的预后效度。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 1988;237(3):166-70. doi: 10.1007/BF00451285.
2
Importance of diagnostic thresholds in familial classification. Dexamethasone suppression test and familial subtypes of depression.诊断阈值在家族分类中的重要性。地塞米松抑制试验与抑郁症的家族亚型。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985 Mar;42(3):300-4. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790260098012.
3
The implications of DSM-III personality disorders for patients with major depression.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版中的人格障碍对重度抑郁症患者的影响。
J Affect Disord. 1984 Dec;7(3-4):309-18. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(84)90052-1.
4
Validity of familial subtypes of primary unipolar depression. Clinical, demographic, and psychosocial correlates.原发性单相抑郁症家族亚型的有效性。临床、人口统计学和社会心理相关因素。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986 Nov;43(11):1090-6. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800110076010.
5
Depression and endogenicity.抑郁症与内源性
Acta Psychiatr Belg. 1984 May-Jun;84(3):240-8.
6
Depression and its subtypes: a treatment update. Introduction.抑郁症及其亚型:治疗进展。引言。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 18:3-4.
7
Validity of an operational definition for neurotic unipolar major depression.神经症性单相重度抑郁症操作性定义的效度
J Affect Disord. 1987 Jan-Feb;12(1):29-40. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(87)90058-9.
8
[Current classifications of depression and their effects on prognosis and therapy].
Rev Med Suisse Romande. 1987 Dec;107(12):981-6.
9
Primary unipolar depression and the prognostic importance of delusions.原发性单相抑郁症及妄想的预后重要性
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982 Oct;39(10):1181-4. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290100051008.
10
Clinical characteristics of outpatients with chronic major depression.慢性重度抑郁症门诊患者的临床特征
J Affect Disord. 1995 Apr 16;34(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(94)00101-e.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of family history of major depression, bipolar disorder, and suicide on clinical features in patients with major depression and bipolar disorder.家族史对重度抑郁症和双相情感障碍患者临床特征的影响。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2013 Mar;263(2):93-103. doi: 10.1007/s00406-012-0322-y. Epub 2012 May 9.
2
Family history of mood disorder and characteristics of major depressive disorder: a STAR*D (sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression) study.心境障碍家族史与重度抑郁症的特征:一项缓解抑郁症的序贯治疗替代方案(STAR*D)研究
J Psychiatr Res. 2007 Apr-Jun;41(3-4):214-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.02.005. Epub 2006 May 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness.原发性抑郁症评定量表的编制。
Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1967 Dec;6(4):278-96. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1967.tb00530.x.
2
Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research.精神科研究中使用的诊断标准。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1972 Jan;26(1):57-63. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1972.01750190059011.
3
Importance of diagnostic thresholds in familial classification. Dexamethasone suppression test and familial subtypes of depression.诊断阈值在家族分类中的重要性。地塞米松抑制试验与抑郁症的家族亚型。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985 Mar;42(3):300-4. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790260098012.
4
Reliability of follow-up assessments of depressed inpatients.抑郁症住院患者随访评估的可靠性。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986 May;43(5):468-70. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800050074008.
5
The treatment validity of DSM-III melancholic subtyping.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版中抑郁亚型的治疗有效性。
Psychiatry Res. 1985 Sep;16(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(85)90026-5.
6
Prognostic validity of the dexamethasone suppression test: results of a six-month prospective follow-up.地塞米松抑制试验的预后效度:六个月前瞻性随访结果
Am J Psychiatry. 1987 Feb;144(2):212-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.144.2.212.
7
Validity of familial subtypes of primary unipolar depression. Clinical, demographic, and psychosocial correlates.原发性单相抑郁症家族亚型的有效性。临床、人口统计学和社会心理相关因素。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986 Nov;43(11):1090-6. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800110076010.
8
ECT response in depressed patients with and without a DSM-III personality disorder.
Am J Psychiatry. 1986 Aug;143(8):1030-2. doi: 10.1176/ajp.143.8.1030.
9
The Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation. A comprehensive method for assessing outcome in prospective longitudinal studies.纵向间隔随访评估。一种在前瞻性纵向研究中评估结果的综合方法。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;44(6):540-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800180050009.
10
Validity of an operational definition for neurotic unipolar major depression.神经症性单相重度抑郁症操作性定义的效度
J Affect Disord. 1987 Jan-Feb;12(1):29-40. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(87)90058-9.