• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受整块切除治疗的脊柱原发性肿瘤患者的健康相关生活质量。

Health-related quality of life in patients treated with en bloc resection for primary tumors of the spine.

作者信息

Noli Luigi Emanuele, Alcherigi Chiara, Griffoni Cristiana, Pesce Eleonora, Rosa Simona, Evangelisti Gisberto, Pipola Valerio, Davassi Paolo Francesco, Monetta Annalisa, Barbanti Brodano Giovanni, Terzi Silvia, Ghermandi Riccardo, Tedesco Giuseppe, Girolami Marco, Bandiera Stefano, Gasbarrini Alessandro

机构信息

ISNB Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Department of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2024 Nov 20;14:1485226. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1485226. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2024.1485226
PMID:39640277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11618236/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the functional outcomes and the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients undergoing en bloc resection of spinal tumor.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

En bloc resection in the spine is a surgical procedure designed to completely remove a tumor in one piece, with wide margins preserved, in order to reduce the risk of local recurrences. This demanding procedure has been shown to improve local control and survival rate, besides a relatively high morbidity.

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2021, 70 patients underwent en bloc resection surgery for a primary spine tumor and 38 came out to be eligible for this analysis. Eligibility criteria include at least one follow-up visit within a two-year period from surgery and Patient Reported Outcomes evaluation collected prospectively at baseline and at least one follow- up in the range 4-24 months. The outcome variables (EQ5D Numeric Scale and Index, SF36 scores and NRS score) were analyzed with multilevel linear mixed-effects regression. Baseline- (age, gender, localization, histotype, number of levels of resection, previous surgery) and time-dependent covariates (adverse events, spinal cord damage) were included.

RESULTS

Beside a slight improvement of all the scores, no significant differences were found between baseline and follow up times for EQ-5D-3L Numeric Scale and Index and for SF-36 Standardized Physical component. SF-36 Standardized Mental component appeared to be significantly better at 12-month FU compared to baseline. Ultimately, age over 50 years old and the occurrence of adverse events emerged to be as the two main factor determining worsening in several HRQOL scores. Pain came out to be significantly reduce at 24-month compared to baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

The aim of en bloc resection in the treatment of primary spinal tumors is to improve survival rates and reduce local recurrences. Despite its radicality, our preliminary results suggest that patients experience a slight to moderate improvement postoperatively compared to their preoperative perceived health status.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性分析。

目的

本研究旨在评估接受脊柱肿瘤整块切除术患者的功能结局及与健康相关的生活质量(HRQOL)。

背景数据总结

脊柱整块切除术是一种手术操作,旨在完整切除肿瘤,保留广泛切缘,以降低局部复发风险。除了发病率相对较高外,这一高要求的手术已被证明可改善局部控制和生存率。

方法

2016年至2021年期间,70例患者接受了原发性脊柱肿瘤整块切除手术,其中38例符合本分析条件。纳入标准包括术后两年内至少一次随访,以及前瞻性收集的患者报告结局评估,基线时及术后4至24个月内至少一次随访。采用多水平线性混合效应回归分析结局变量(EQ5D数字量表和指数、SF36评分和NRS评分)。纳入基线协变量(年龄、性别、肿瘤位置、组织学类型、切除节段数、既往手术史)和时间依赖性协变量(不良事件、脊髓损伤)。

结果

除所有评分略有改善外,EQ-5D-3L数字量表和指数以及SF-36标准化身体成分在基线和随访时无显著差异。SF-36标准化心理成分在随访12个月时与基线相比明显更好。最终,50岁以上年龄和不良事件的发生是导致几个HRQOL评分恶化的两个主要因素。与基线相比,24个月时疼痛明显减轻。

结论

原发性脊柱肿瘤整块切除术的目的是提高生存率并减少局部复发。尽管该手术具有根治性,但我们的初步结果表明,与术前感知的健康状况相比,患者术后有轻微至中度改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/03d3b1242ebb/fonc-14-1485226-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/bbebd2431f0b/fonc-14-1485226-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/923a8aef3754/fonc-14-1485226-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/7fcd6b6b093f/fonc-14-1485226-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/a369cee10c33/fonc-14-1485226-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/7cd10153b1e3/fonc-14-1485226-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/3f909c61ddaa/fonc-14-1485226-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/c695f06c5934/fonc-14-1485226-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/92eca50ac5d7/fonc-14-1485226-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/e4621a5ad4ae/fonc-14-1485226-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/c6ca48d35160/fonc-14-1485226-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/5314182f215f/fonc-14-1485226-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/03d3b1242ebb/fonc-14-1485226-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/bbebd2431f0b/fonc-14-1485226-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/923a8aef3754/fonc-14-1485226-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/7fcd6b6b093f/fonc-14-1485226-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/a369cee10c33/fonc-14-1485226-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/7cd10153b1e3/fonc-14-1485226-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/3f909c61ddaa/fonc-14-1485226-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/c695f06c5934/fonc-14-1485226-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/92eca50ac5d7/fonc-14-1485226-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/e4621a5ad4ae/fonc-14-1485226-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/c6ca48d35160/fonc-14-1485226-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/5314182f215f/fonc-14-1485226-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48f0/11618236/03d3b1242ebb/fonc-14-1485226-g012.jpg

相似文献

1
Health-related quality of life in patients treated with en bloc resection for primary tumors of the spine.接受整块切除治疗的脊柱原发性肿瘤患者的健康相关生活质量。
Front Oncol. 2024 Nov 20;14:1485226. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1485226. eCollection 2024.
2
En bloc resections for primary spinal tumors in 20 years of experience: effectiveness and safety.20年原发性脊柱肿瘤整块切除经验:有效性与安全性
Spine J. 2014 Nov 1;14(11):2608-17. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.030. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
3
Is Navigation-guided En Bloc Resection Advantageous Compared With Intralesional Curettage for Locally Aggressive Bone Tumors?导航引导整块切除术与腔内刮除术治疗局部侵袭性骨肿瘤相比有优势吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Mar;476(3):511-517. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000054.
4
En Bloc Resections in the Spine: The Experience of 220 Patients During 25 Years.脊柱整块切除术:25年间220例患者的经验
World Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;98:217-229. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.086. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
5
En Bloc Resection of Primary Malignant Bone Tumor in the Cervical Spine Based on 3-Dimensional Printing Technology.基于三维打印技术的颈椎原发性恶性骨肿瘤整块切除术。
Orthop Surg. 2016 May;8(2):171-8. doi: 10.1111/os.12234.
6
Quality of life after en bloc resection of tumors in the mobile spine.活动脊柱肿瘤整块切除术后的生活质量。
Spine J. 2015 Aug 1;15(8):1728-37. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.03.042. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
7
Feasibility and safety of en bloc resection for primary spine tumors: a systematic review by the Spine Oncology Study Group.整块切除术治疗原发性脊柱肿瘤的可行性和安全性:脊柱肿瘤研究组的系统评价。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Oct 15;34(22 Suppl):S31-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b8b796.
8
Outcomes following attempted en bloc resection of cervical chordomas in the C-1 and C-2 region versus the subaxial region: a multiinstitutional experience.C-1和C-2区域与轴下区域颈椎脊索瘤整块切除术后的结果:一项多机构研究经验
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Sep;21(3):348-56. doi: 10.3171/2014.5.SPINE121045. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
9
Multilevel en bloc spondylectomy for tumors of the thoracic and lumbar spine is challenging but rewarding.用于胸腰椎肿瘤的多级整块脊椎切除术具有挑战性,但也很有意义。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Mar;473(3):858-67. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3578-x.
10
Perioperative adverse events following surgery for primary bone tumors of the spine and en bloc resection for metastases.脊柱原发性骨肿瘤手术及转移瘤整块切除术后的围手术期不良事件。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Sep 27;32(1):98-105. doi: 10.3171/2019.6.SPINE19587. Print 2020 Jan 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Therapeutic strategies for mobile spine chordoma: en bloc Versus intralesional surgery with adjuvant charged-particle therapy.可移动性脊柱脊索瘤的治疗策略:整块切除与病灶内手术联合辅助带电粒子治疗。
J Neurooncol. 2025 Jan;171(1):229-240. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04841-w. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
2
Intentional Enneking-inappropriate surgery and high-energy particle therapy for unresectable osteogenic sarcoma of the spine: a retrospective study.为不可切除脊柱骨肉瘤行 Enneking 不适当的肿瘤切除和高能量粒子治疗:一项回顾性研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 Sep 27;41(6):708-715. doi: 10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231401. Print 2024 Dec 1.
3
Radiotherapy for Mobile Spine and Sacral Chordoma: A Critical Review and Practical Guide from the Spine Tumor Academy.
可移动脊柱和骶骨脊索瘤的放射治疗:来自脊柱肿瘤学会的批判性综述与实用指南
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 18;15(8):2359. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082359.
4
Medium to long term follow-up of survival and quality of life in patients with primary tumors of the cervical spine: Experience From a large single center.颈椎原发性肿瘤患者生存及生活质量的中长期随访:来自大型单中心的经验
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1011100. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1011100. eCollection 2022.
5
Complications and Risk Factors in En Bloc Resection of Spinal Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis on 298 Patients Treated in a Single Institution.整块切除脊柱肿瘤的并发症和危险因素:单中心 298 例患者的回顾性分析。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Oct 17;29(10):7842-7857. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29100620.
6
The minimal important change for the EQ VAS based on the SF-36 health transition item: observations from 25772 spine surgery procedures.基于 SF-36 健康转变项目的 EQ VAS 的最小重要变化:来自 25772 例脊柱手术的观察结果。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Dec;31(12):3459-3466. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03182-3. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
7
Spinal metastasis: narrative reviews of the current evidence and treatment modalities.脊柱转移瘤:当前证据和治疗方式的叙述性综述。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Apr;50(4):3000605221091665. doi: 10.1177/03000605221091665.
8
Systematic review of charged-particle therapy for chordomas and sarcomas of the mobile spine and sacrum.系统综述:移动脊柱和骶骨脊索瘤和肉瘤的带电粒子治疗。
Neurosurg Focus. 2021 May;50(5):E17. doi: 10.3171/2021.2.FOCUS201059.
9
What Are the Minimum Clinically Important Differences in SF-36 Scores in Patients with Orthopaedic Oncologic Conditions?骨科肿瘤患者 SF-36 评分的最小临床重要差异是多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2148-2158. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001341.
10
Perioperative adverse events following surgery for primary bone tumors of the spine and en bloc resection for metastases.脊柱原发性骨肿瘤手术及转移瘤整块切除术后的围手术期不良事件。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Sep 27;32(1):98-105. doi: 10.3171/2019.6.SPINE19587. Print 2020 Jan 1.