Division of Neurosurgery, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Oct 15;34(22 Suppl):S31-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b8b796.
Systematic review.
To determine the general feasibility and safety of en bloc resection for primary spine tumors by analyzing (1) the effect of incisional biopsy performed before definitive en bloc resection and (2) the rate of achievement of disease-free margins, morbidity, mortality, and health resource utilization.
The feasibility of en bloc resection is determined by careful surgical and oncologic staging, and a key step in this process is obtaining a tissue diagnosis. There is currently good evidence to support the premise that the best chance for surgical cure in primary tumors of the spine is by en bloc resection with disease-free margins; however, the early morbidity of these procedures begs the question of whether they are justified.
A formal systematic review with search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases was undertaken. Included reports described patients with low grade malignant spine tumors, the method of staging and surgical resection, and the complications. Two blinded, independent reviewers used a standardized study selection worksheet.
About 89 articles were identified, with 8 selected after excluding small case series and studies that included other pathologies (e.g., metastatic disease). Weinstein, Boriani, Biagini staging accurately predicted the attainment of wide or marginal en bloc resection in 88% of cases. There was a clear increase in tumor recurrence when intralesional procedures were performed before the definitive en bloc resection. Tumor recurrence significantly shortened patient survival. Surgical complication rates ranged from 13% to 56% and mortality ranged from 0% to 7.7%.
(1) Incisional biopsy or intralesional resection significantly increases the risk of local recurrence, therefore, transcutaneous computed tomography-guided trocar biopsy is recommended. When there is a suspicion of primary spine tumor, the surgeon who performs the definitive surgery should ideally perform or direct the biopsy procedure. (2) En bloc resection is achievable if staging determines that it is feasible. The adverse event profile of these surgeries is high even at experienced centers. Therefore, experienced, multidisciplinary teams should perform these surgeries. (3) Grade of Recommendation can be "strong recommendation, low-quality evidence."
系统评价。
通过分析(1)在明确的整块切除前进行的切开活检的效果,以及(2)无瘤切缘的获得率、发病率、死亡率和卫生资源利用情况,来确定原发性脊柱肿瘤整块切除的一般可行性和安全性。
整块切除的可行性取决于仔细的外科和肿瘤分期,而这个过程中的一个关键步骤是获得组织诊断。目前有充分的证据支持这样一个前提,即在脊柱原发性肿瘤中,通过无瘤切缘的整块切除获得手术治愈的机会最好;然而,这些手术的早期发病率提出了一个问题,即它们是否合理。
对 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库进行了正式的系统评价搜索。纳入的报告描述了患有低度恶性脊柱肿瘤的患者、分期和手术切除的方法以及并发症。两名经过培训的、独立的审查员使用标准化的研究选择工作表。
大约有 89 篇文章被确定,其中 8 篇在排除了小病例系列和包括其他病理(例如,转移性疾病)的研究后被选中。Weinstein、Boriani、Biagini 分期系统在 88%的病例中准确预测了广泛或边缘性整块切除的获得。在明确的整块切除前进行经皮 CT 引导的穿刺活检或肿瘤内切除术会明显增加肿瘤复发的风险。肿瘤复发显著缩短了患者的生存时间。手术并发症发生率为 13%至 56%,死亡率为 0%至 7.7%。
(1)切开活检或肿瘤内切除显著增加局部复发的风险,因此,推荐经皮 CT 引导的穿刺活检。当怀疑有原发性脊柱肿瘤时,进行确定性手术的外科医生理想情况下应进行或指导活检程序。(2)如果分期确定可行,则可实现整块切除。即使在经验丰富的中心,这些手术的不良事件发生率也很高。因此,应由经验丰富的多学科团队进行这些手术。(3)推荐级别可以是“强烈推荐,低质量证据”。