Yuruki Tomoko, Fujimoto Masafumi, Hirata Naoyuki
Department of Anesthesiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1, Honjyo, Cyuoku, Kumamoto-City 860-8556, Kumamoto, Japan.
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2024 Nov 28;2024:9990140. doi: 10.1155/anrp/9990140. eCollection 2024.
Remimazolam is a newly developed benzodiazepine. Early recovery from anesthesia because of its ultra-short acting effect and less hemodynamic side effects has been reported as the specific advantages of remimazolam. Therefore, the maintenance of anesthesia with propofol may be sometimes switched to remimazolam anesthesia maintenance during surgery because of the risk of delayed awakening and unstable hemodynamics. In the present study, to determine the influence of switching anesthesia from propofol to remimazolam on the baseline TOF ratio, the TOF ratio under remimazolam anesthesia maintenance without any neuromuscular blocking agents was compared to that calibrated after induction of general anesthesia with propofol. Twelve patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia in the supine position were investigated. After induction of general anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol, a supraglottic airway was inserted without neuromuscular blockade, and TOF stimulation every 15 s at the adductor pollicis muscle was started with acceleromyography. After stable baseline responses to TOF stimulation being obtained for at least 10 min under propofol anesthesia, the anesthetic agent was switched to remimazolam and TOF stimulation every 15 s was maintained for a further 60 min without any interruption. In each case, the averaged TOF ratio during the last 10 min of TOF monitoring was compared to that during the 10 min immediately before the beginning of remimazolam infusion using a paired -test. There were no significant differences in the TOF ratios before and after switching anesthesia to remimazolam (1.07 ± 0.03 vs. 1.07 ± 0.03, =0.325). Switching anesthesia from propofol to remimazolam does not affect the baseline TOF ratio.
瑞马唑仑是一种新开发的苯二氮䓬类药物。因其超短效作用和较少的血流动力学副作用,麻醉后早期苏醒被报道为瑞马唑仑的特定优势。因此,由于存在延迟苏醒和血流动力学不稳定的风险,手术期间有时会将丙泊酚维持麻醉切换为瑞马唑仑维持麻醉。在本研究中,为了确定从丙泊酚转换为瑞马唑仑麻醉对基线强直刺激后计数(TOF)比值的影响,将在不使用任何神经肌肉阻滞剂的情况下瑞马唑仑维持麻醉期间的TOF比值与丙泊酚诱导全身麻醉后校准的TOF比值进行比较。对12例计划在全身麻醉下仰卧位进行择期手术的患者进行了研究。在瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚诱导全身麻醉后,在未使用神经肌肉阻滞剂的情况下插入声门上气道,并使用加速度肌电图在拇内收肌每15秒进行一次TOF刺激。在丙泊酚麻醉下获得至少10分钟稳定的TOF刺激基线反应后,将麻醉剂切换为瑞马唑仑,并每15秒进行一次TOF刺激,持续60分钟无任何中断。在每种情况下,使用配对t检验将TOF监测最后10分钟的平均TOF比值与瑞马唑仑输注开始前10分钟的平均TOF比值进行比较。将麻醉转换为瑞马唑仑前后的TOF比值无显著差异(1.07±0.03对1.07±0.03,P = 0.325)。从丙泊酚转换为瑞马唑仑麻醉不会影响基线TOF比值。