Houbrechts Katrien, Marshall Nicholas, Cockmartin Lesley, Bosmans Hilde
KU Leuven, Department of Imaging and Pathology-Medical Physics and Quality Assessment, Leuven, Belgium.
UZ Leuven, Department of Radiology, Leuven, Belgium.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025 Jan;12(Suppl 1):S13009. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.S1.S13009. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
We characterize the flying focal spot (FFS) technology in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), designed to overcome source motion blurring.
A wide-angle DBT system with continuous gantry and focus motion ("uncompensated focus") and a system with FFS were compared for image sharpness and lesion detectability. The modulation transfer function (MTF) was assessed as a function of height in the projections and reconstructed images, along with lesion detectability using the contrast detail phantom for mammography (CDMAM) and the L1 phantom.
For the uncompensated focus system, the spatial frequency for 25% MTF value ( ) measured at 2, 4, and 6 cm in DBT projections fell by 35%, 49%, and 59%, respectively in the tube-travel direction compared with the FFS system. There was no significant difference in for the front-back and tube-travel directions for the FFS unit. The in-plane MTF in the tube-travel direction also improved with the FFS technology.The threshold gold thickness ( ) for the 0.16-mm diameter discs of contrast detail phantom for mammography (CDMAM) improved for the FFS system in DBT mode, especially at greater heights above the table; at 45 and 65 mm improved by 16% and 24%, respectively, compared with the uncompensated focus system. In addition, improvements in calcification and mass detection in a structured background were observed for DBT and synthetic mammography. The FFS system demonstrated faster scan times (4.8 s versus 21.7 s), potentially reducing patient motion artifacts.
The FFS technology offers isotropic resolution, improved small detail detectability, and faster scan times in DBT mode compared with the traditional continuous gantry and focus motion approach.
我们对数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)中的飞行焦点(FFS)技术进行了特性描述,该技术旨在克服源运动模糊。
将具有连续机架和焦点运动(“未补偿焦点”)的广角DBT系统与具有FFS的系统在图像清晰度和病变可检测性方面进行了比较。调制传递函数(MTF)作为投影和重建图像中高度的函数进行评估,同时使用用于乳腺摄影的对比细节体模(CDMAM)和L1体模评估病变可检测性。
对于未补偿焦点系统,在DBT投影中,在2、4和6 cm处测量的25% MTF值( )的空间频率在管移动方向上与FFS系统相比分别下降了35%、49%和59%。FFS单元在前后方向和管移动方向上的 没有显著差异。管移动方向上的平面内MTF也通过FFS技术得到了改善。在DBT模式下,FFS系统的乳腺摄影对比细节体模(CDMAM)中0.16 mm直径圆盘的阈值金厚度( )有所改善,尤其是在台面上方更高的高度处;与未补偿焦点系统相比,在45和65 mm处分别提高了16%和24%。此外,在DBT和合成乳腺摄影中,在结构化背景下钙化和肿块检测方面也有改善。FFS系统显示扫描时间更快(4.8秒对21.7秒),有可能减少患者运动伪影。
与传统的连续机架和焦点运动方法相比,FFS技术在DBT模式下提供了各向同性分辨率、更好的小细节可检测性和更快的扫描时间。