Whitehead W E, Parker L, Bosmajian L, Morrill-Corbin E D, Middaugh S, Garwood M, Cataldo M F, Freeman J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986 Apr;67(4):218-24.
Two experiments compared the effects of biofeedback training to behavior modification in the treatment of 33 children aged 5 to 16 who had fecal incontinence secondary to myelomeningocele. Biofeedback involved providing visual feedback and rewards for successively stronger sphincter contractions during training sessions and requiring 50 sphincter contraction exercises daily. Behavior modification involved attempting to defecate immediately after the evening meal each day, receiving a reward for defecating in the toilet without an enema or suppository, and receiving an enema if unsuccessful for two consecutive days. In experiment I, eight children were offered biofeedback alone in an attempt to replicate previous studies. Biofeedback alone was found insufficient; addition of behavior modification was necessary. Experiment II systematically investigated the relative contribution of these two treatments. Overall, patients who received only behavior modification for three months showed as much clinical improvement as patients who received behavior modification plus biofeedback. This suggests that previous reports, because they have not controlled for nonspecific treatment effects, have overestimated the value of biofeedback in this population. However, a subgroup of patients (27%) were identified for whom biofeedback provided additional, specific benefit. These were children who had spinal cord lesions below L-2 and who initially had two or more bowel movements daily. The combination of behavior modification and biofeedback resulted in a greater than 50% reduction in the frequency of incontinence for 64% of patients, and results were well maintained at follow-up one year later.
两项实验比较了生物反馈训练与行为矫正对33名5至16岁因脊髓脊膜膨出继发大便失禁儿童的治疗效果。生物反馈训练包括在训练过程中为逐渐增强的括约肌收缩提供视觉反馈和奖励,并要求每天进行50次括约肌收缩练习。行为矫正包括每天晚餐后立即尝试排便,在没有灌肠或使用栓剂的情况下在马桶内排便可获得奖励,连续两天未成功排便则进行灌肠。在实验I中,八名儿童仅接受生物反馈训练,试图复制先前的研究。结果发现仅进行生物反馈训练是不够的;必须增加行为矫正。实验II系统地研究了这两种治疗方法的相对作用。总体而言,仅接受三个月行为矫正治疗的患者与接受行为矫正加生物反馈治疗的患者临床改善程度相同。这表明先前的报告由于未控制非特异性治疗效果,高估了生物反馈对该人群的价值。然而,确定了一个亚组患者(27%),生物反馈对他们有额外的特定益处。这些儿童脊髓损伤位于L-2以下,最初每天有两次或更多次排便。行为矫正与生物反馈相结合使64%的患者失禁频率降低超过50%,且在一年后的随访中效果良好。