Freund K, Scher H, Racansky I G, Campbell K, Heasman G
Arch Sex Behav. 1986 Feb;15(1):23-35. doi: 10.1007/BF01542302.
The hypothesis that the preferential rape pattern belongs among the courtship disorders like voyeurism, exhibitionism, and toucheurism was tested. The study consisted of two experiments. The first compared 11 rape-prone males, who were most likely afflicted with the preferential rape pattern, with 11 sexually normal controls on penile response to narratives that depicted scenes in which the individual engaged in behavior typical of voyeurs, exhibitionists, or toucheurs. Narratives depicting normal tactile interaction (short of intercourse) with a genuinely participating woman, normal intercourse, and sexually neutral scenes were also presented. The rape-prone males responded more to the voyeuristic situations than did the controls. The standing of the normal intercourse situations on the scale of erotic value, relative to the other above-mentioned situations, was lower for the rape-prone males than for the normal controls. A second experiment compared 12 rape-prone males, who most likely demonstrated the preferential rape pattern, with 12 males with (other) courtship disorders and 12 sexually normal controls. Penile response to narratives depicting the individual involved in pretactile erotic activity, in tactile sexual activity short of intercourse, or in having intercourse was compared. Each situation was presented in two modalities depicting either a genuinely participating woman or a woman fearful of the individual. The penile responses of the rape-prone males, as well as those of males with other courtship disorders, differentiated less between sexual interaction with a fearful woman and such interaction with a participating woman than did the penile responses of normal controls. There was no significant difference in this respect between the rape-prone males and males with other courtship disorders.
关于偏好性强奸模式属于诸如窥阴癖、露阴癖和抚摸癖等求爱障碍的假设得到了检验。该研究由两个实验组成。第一个实验将11名易患强奸行为的男性(他们极有可能患有偏好性强奸模式)与11名性方面正常的对照组人员进行比较,比较他们在听到描述个体参与窥阴癖者、露阴癖者或抚摸癖者典型行为场景的叙述时阴茎的反应。还呈现了描述与真正参与互动的女性进行正常触觉互动(不包括性交)、正常性交以及性中性场景的叙述。易患强奸行为的男性对窥阴癖情境的反应比对照组更强烈。相对于上述其他情境,正常性交情境在性价值量表上的地位,易患强奸行为的男性比正常对照组更低。第二个实验将12名极有可能表现出偏好性强奸模式的易患强奸行为的男性与12名患有(其他)求爱障碍的男性以及12名性方面正常的对照组人员进行比较。比较了他们在听到描述个体参与触觉前性活动、非性交的触觉性活动或性交的叙述时阴茎的反应。每种情境都以两种形式呈现,一种描绘的是真正参与互动的女性,另一种描绘的是害怕该个体的女性。易患强奸行为的男性以及患有其他求爱障碍的男性的阴茎反应,在与害怕的女性进行性互动和与参与互动的女性进行性互动之间的差异,比正常对照组的阴茎反应要小。在这方面,易患强奸行为的男性与患有其他求爱障碍的男性之间没有显著差异。