Xiang Hongxun, Yang Yang, Qi Xingyu
School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
School of Marxism, Xichang Minzu Preschool Normal College, Xichang, China.
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 10;10(20):e39199. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39199. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
Community resilience is a core component of grassroots governance modernization, and community resilience shows different characteristics depending on the type of community. Existing research on community resilience mainly uses direct questionnaire data, relatively ignoring the differences in weights of various dimensions. Different categories of community resilience components play different roles in community resilience. Based on this, the study cited the logic of the AHP-FCE model and added objective data based on empowering resilience, thus making up for the model's shortcomings while giving full play to the model's advantages. The quantitative analysis of 353 questionnaires from five urban districts and five rural communities in the sample city was based on the community resilience evaluation model. In the current process of community resilience construction, there are typical problems of a lack of cultural resilience in urban community resilience construction and a need for more intelligent resilience in rural community resilience construction. The key to future community resilience construction is reconciling the relationship between cultural and intellectual resilience to solve the problem of targeting deviation in urban communities and rural community resilience construction. It is necessary to adhere to the spirit of "long-term construction" to build the cultural resilience of urban communities, implement the path of "digital empowerment" to make the intelligent resilience of rural communities, and adhere to the standard of "complete redundancy" to form an urban and rural community resilience governance mechanism gradually, and then Move towards more resilient urban and rural community governance and help realize the modernization of grassroots governance.
社区韧性是基层治理现代化的核心组成部分，且社区韧性因社区类型而异。现有关于社区韧性的研究主要使用直接问卷调查数据，相对忽视了各维度权重的差异。不同类别的社区韧性组成部分在社区韧性中发挥着不同作用。基于此，该研究引用层次分析法-模糊综合评价（AHP-FCE）模型的逻辑，并在增强韧性的基础上增加客观数据，从而在充分发挥该模型优势的同时弥补其不足。基于社区韧性评价模型，对样本城市五个城区和五个农村社区的353份问卷进行了定量分析。在当前社区韧性建设过程中，存在城市社区韧性建设缺乏文化韧性、农村社区韧性建设需要更多智能韧性等典型问题。未来社区韧性建设的关键在于协调文化韧性与智能韧性之间的关系，以解决城市社区和农村社区韧性建设中的目标偏差问题。要坚持“长期建设”精神打造城市社区的文化韧性，落实“数字赋能”路径实现农村社区的智能韧性，坚持“完全冗余”标准逐步形成城乡社区韧性治理机制，进而迈向更具韧性的城乡社区治理，助力实现基层治理现代化。
