Miller Edward, Thabrew Hiran
Department of Psychological Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Digit Health. 2024 Dec 5;10:20552076241302204. doi: 10.1177/20552076241302204. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
Given that 'digitally native' children and young people spend much time at school, universal e-mental health interventions (ueMHIs) may have a role in supporting their wellbeing and reducing common mental health problems like anxiety and depression. However, the efficacy of school-based ueMHIs has never formally been evaluated.
During this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched online databases MEDLINE, ERIC and ACM and the grey literature for trials of school-based ueMHIs targeted at improving wellbeing or reducing anxiety or depression in students aged 5-18. Primary outcomes were changes in symptoms of wellbeing, anxiety and depression at <3 months. Secondary outcomes were changes in these symptoms at 3-12 months and >12 months. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Quality of included studies was appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023421872.
From 11,026 screened records, 15 papers were found and included in a systematic review. Of these, 14 papers including 8844 students were analysed in the meta-analysis. School-based ueMHIs did not significantly reduce anxiety (SMD = -0.55, 95% CI -1.68, 0.59) or depression (SMD = -0.29, 95% CI = -0.89, 0.32) at <3 months. School-based ueMHIs also did not significantly reduce anxiety (SMD = -1.03, 95% CI -3.20, 1.14) or depression (SMD = -0.47, 95% CI -1.40, 0.46) at 3-12 months. School-based ueMHIs did not significantly improve wellbeing at <3 months (SMD = 0.01, 95% CI -0.12, 0.14) and favoured control condition at 3-12 months (SMD = -0.14, 95% CI -0.23, -0.05). RoB was high across most studies and the overall quality of evidence was very low.
Although existing school-based ueMHIs show promise for addressing pupil mental health concerns, further higher-quality evidence is needed. There is room for the development of new school-based ueMHIs for reducing pupil anxiety and depression and improving wellbeing in a scalable, clinically and cost-effective manner, whilst not causing harm.
鉴于“数字原生代”儿童和青少年在学校度过大量时间,通用电子心理健康干预措施(ueMHIs)可能在支持他们的幸福感以及减少焦虑和抑郁等常见心理健康问题方面发挥作用。然而,基于学校的ueMHIs的疗效从未得到正式评估。
在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们在在线数据库MEDLINE、ERIC和ACM以及灰色文献中搜索针对5至18岁学生改善幸福感或减少焦虑或抑郁的基于学校的ueMHIs试验。主要结局是在3个月内幸福感、焦虑和抑郁症状的变化。次要结局是在3至12个月和超过12个月时这些症状的变化。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。使用Cochrane偏倚风险(RoB)工具评估纳入研究的质量。本研究已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD42023421872。
从11026条筛选记录中,发现15篇论文并纳入系统评价。其中,14篇论文(包括8844名学生)纳入荟萃分析。基于学校的ueMHIs在3个月内未显著降低焦虑(标准化均数差[SMD]=-0.55,95%置信区间[-1.68,0.59])或抑郁(SMD=-0.29,95%置信区间[-0.89,0.32])。基于学校的ueMHIs在3至12个月时也未显著降低焦虑(SMD=-1.03,95%置信区间[-3.20,1.14])或抑郁(SMD=-0.47,95%置信区间[-1.40,0.46])。基于学校的ueMHIs在3个月内未显著改善幸福感(SMD=0.01,95%置信区间[-0.12,0.14]),在3至12个月时有利于对照组(SMD=-0.14,95%置信区间[-0.23,-0.05])。大多数研究的偏倚风险较高,证据的总体质量非常低。
尽管现有的基于学校的ueMHIs在解决学生心理健康问题方面显示出前景,但仍需要进一步的高质量证据。有空间开发新的基于学校的ueMHIs,以可扩展、临床和成本效益高的方式减少学生的焦虑和抑郁并改善幸福感,同时不造成伤害。