Hicks Joshua, McAleer Claire, Mutowo Mutsa
Olympus KeyMed Group Ltd, Southend on Sea, UK.
Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Digit Health. 2024 Dec 5;10:20552076241293926. doi: 10.1177/20552076241293926. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
Despite the benefits of digital transformation, many healthcare organisations still rely on manual, traditional processes to transfer clinical images and videos to electronic patient records (EPRs), consuming valuable nurse-patient-facing time. Our study aimed to outline tasks performed by nurses to traditionally transfer clinical images and videos to EPRs, assess the impact on nurses' time and efficiency cost, and report on nurse experiences when transitioning to a digitised process.
Observations spanned two one-week periods in the ENT outpatient department of Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, using direct observational time and predetermined motion time system analysis to map nurses' tasks pre-and post-implementation of a Medical Video Recorder and Centralised Medical Content Management. Two staff experience surveys were conducted, and data was aggregated to evaluate the impact of digitisation.
Nurses traditionally followed two processes to transfer clinical images and video to EPRs. Digitisation saved 43 seconds per endoscopy (a 10% efficiency gain) compared to Process 1, in which nurses print, attach, scan, and digitise images off-site to EPRs, and 3 minutes and 8 seconds (a 33% efficiency gain) compared to Process 2, where urgent content is recorded on an iPad and transferred to EPRs. Digitising could save nurses 26 working days annually by reducing non-patient-facing tasks in the ENT department, leading to an annual time efficiency cost-saving of £6780. Furthermore, 75% of nurses reported significantly improved morale, 63% strongly agreed that digitisation improved confidence in the accuracy of patient details, and all paper processes were eliminated.
Our findings highlight the inefficiency of traditional methods in transferring images and videos to EPRs. Digital transformation could enhance nursing efficiency and morale, improving care quality. Future studies should evaluate the effectiveness of Medical Video Recorders and Centralised Medical Content Management in other departments.
尽管数字化转型有诸多益处,但许多医疗保健机构仍依赖手工、传统流程将临床图像和视频传输到电子病历(EPR)中,这消耗了护士与患者面对面交流的宝贵时间。我们的研究旨在概述护士传统上用于将临床图像和视频传输到电子病历的任务,评估对护士时间和效率成本的影响,并报告向数字化流程过渡时护士的体验。
在皇家德文郡大学医疗保健国民保健服务基金会信托的耳鼻喉科门诊进行了为期两周的观察,采用直接观察时间和预定动作时间系统分析来绘制护士在实施医疗录像机和集中式医疗内容管理前后的任务。进行了两项员工体验调查,并汇总数据以评估数字化的影响。
护士传统上遵循两种流程将临床图像和视频传输到电子病历中。与流程1相比,数字化使每次内窥镜检查节省43秒(效率提高10%),在流程1中,护士打印、粘贴、扫描并在异地将图像数字化到电子病历中;与流程2相比,节省3分08秒(效率提高33%),在流程2中,紧急内容记录在iPad上并传输到电子病历中。通过减少耳鼻喉科非患者面对面的任务,数字化每年可为护士节省26个工作日,每年节省时间效率成本6780英镑。此外,75%的护士报告士气显著提高,63%的护士强烈同意数字化提高了对患者详细信息准确性的信心,并且所有纸质流程都被消除。
我们的研究结果凸显了传统方法在将图像和视频传输到电子病历方面的低效。数字化转型可以提高护理效率和士气,改善护理质量。未来的研究应评估医疗录像机和集中式医疗内容管理在其他科室的有效性。