Bundschuh C, Weidner N, Scholz T F M, Parthé S, Jost L, Gößnitzer E, Kräusslich H G
Heidelberg University, Department of Infectious Diseases, Virology, Heidelberg, Germany.
Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University Graz, Austria.
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 13;10(22):e40282. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40282. eCollection 2024 Nov 30.
Since the onset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in late 2019, many studies suggest that actual infection rates may far exceed reported cases. Therefore, this study provides a comprehensive overview of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody measurements and their significance in epidemiological surveillance, especially regarding the true extent of SARS-CoV-2 infections, allowing more detailed insights into the dynamics of the pandemic.
Antibodies were measured using the Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay for the nucleocapsid (N) protein and the SARS-CoV-2 IgG (sCOVG) assay for the spike (S) protein. A total of 25197 specimens from University Hospital Heidelberg were analyzed between May 2020 and December 2023, with 16957 samples measured for both antibodies, 2756 for anti-N only, and 5484 for anti-S only.For the epidemiological tracing of the SARS-CoV-2 incidence we analyzed changes in the anti-N positivity rate and anti-S positivity rate within our tertiary hospital setting across consecutive quarters.
Anti-N measurements allowed for a retrospective analysis of SARS-CoV-2 epidemiological developments, revealing significant changes (p <0.05) in the anti-N positivity rate following incidence peaks (increase) and low incidence periods (decrease) with only three non-significant transitions.On the other hand, the anti-S positivity rate showed only four significant transitions between consecutive quarters.
The anti-N positivity rate is an effective and straightforward retrospective serological tool for tracking epidemiological trends, while the anti-S rate is influenced by vaccination and epidemiology as well, making it inept for the tracing of epidemiological changes. Although the recent development in SARS-CoV-2 epidemiology with increasing intervals between infection waves already provide an enhanced statistical robustness, we recommend the determination of the anti-N positivity rate in larger study populations.
自2019年末新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行开始以来,许多研究表明实际感染率可能远远超过报告病例数。因此,本研究全面概述了抗新型冠状病毒2抗体检测及其在流行病学监测中的意义,特别是关于新型冠状病毒2感染的真实程度,从而能更详细地洞察大流行的动态。
使用针对核衣壳(N)蛋白的Elecsys®抗新型冠状病毒2检测法和针对刺突(S)蛋白的新型冠状病毒2 IgG(sCOVG)检测法检测抗体。2020年5月至2023年12月期间,对海德堡大学医院的25197份标本进行了分析,其中16957份样本同时检测了两种抗体,2756份仅检测了抗N抗体,5484份仅检测了抗S抗体。为了对新型冠状病毒2发病率进行流行病学追踪,我们分析了三级医院环境中连续几个季度抗N阳性率和抗S阳性率的变化。
抗N检测有助于对新型冠状病毒2的流行病学发展进行回顾性分析,发现在发病高峰(上升)和低发病期(下降)后抗N阳性率有显著变化(p<0.05),只有三次无显著变化。另一方面,抗S阳性率在连续季度之间仅显示出四次显著变化。
抗N阳性率是追踪流行病学趋势的一种有效且直接的回顾性血清学工具,而抗S率也受疫苗接种和流行病学的影响,因此不适合用于追踪流行病学变化。尽管新型冠状病毒2流行病学的最新发展,随着感染波次之间间隔时间的增加,已经提供了更强的统计稳健性,但我们建议在更大的研究人群中测定抗N阳性率。