Rudan Igor
Centre for Global Health, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, UK.
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, UK.
J Glob Health. 2024 Dec 6;14:01002. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.01002.
Humans have developed sensory organs for their 'major' senses and specific neuronal receptors for a number of additional senses. Although information from sensors is integrated and processed in the brain, the brain itself has not been proposed as a sensory organ associated with a particular sense - at least not in Western culture or scientific literature. Perception of ideas has many elements of a separate sense, with the brain being a primary sensory organ. I support this notion based on 17 years of experience in the application of the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) method for setting research priorities, which resulted in more than 150 publications involving thousands of experts who prioritised more than 20 000 research ideas. This body of work allows for the generalisation of the following key concepts: defining an idea in the context of the brain's sensory perception; defining the point of origin, sensory qualities, and common types of ideas; considering responses of the body to the brain's sensory exposure to ideas; and defining the key criteria that the brain uses to discriminate between and prioritise ideas. The human brain is continuously being exposed to ideas, which can be self-generated, triggered by information from other sensors, or introduced from the external world. From the brain's sensory perspective, ideas are competing possibilities of purposeful activities that, if followed, would be expected to result in an alternative version of the future. Pursuing ideas tends to drive most of human activity. It requires prioritising between short-, mid-, and long-term investment of energy and time. The brain's sensory role is to continuously assess many competing ideas and prioritise between them based on motivational/emotional ('attractiveness'), operational/rational ('feasibility') and outcome-related perspective ('impact'). Exposure to new ideas may instigate physiological and psychological responses, ranging from enthusiasm and excitement to feeling a threat or fear. Ideas can be used to mobilise large groups of people whose brains respond with excessive enthusiasm that can sometimes be fanatical. The judgment on the attractiveness, feasibility, and potential impact of ideas is affected by education, experience, and cognitive abilities. This sense may be sharpened through an increased level of expert knowledge and experience. Misinformation and disinformation are dangerous because they affect the brain's perception of ideas. Impairment of this inherent sense may perhaps contribute to some mental health issues. The proposed view of the brain as the sensor of ideas could lead to many qualitative or quantitative experiments to further explore the properties of this sense in both individuals and populations, establishing 'the science of ideas'.
人类已经为其“主要”感官发展出了感觉器官,并为许多其他感官发展出了特定的神经元受体。尽管来自传感器的信息在大脑中进行整合和处理,但大脑本身尚未被视为与特定感官相关的感觉器官——至少在西方文化或科学文献中并非如此。对观念的感知具有许多独立感官的元素,大脑是主要的感觉器官。基于我在应用儿童健康与营养研究倡议(CHNRI)方法设定研究优先级方面17年的经验,我支持这一观点。这一经验产生了150多篇出版物,涉及数千名专家,他们对20000多个研究想法进行了优先级排序。这项工作成果使得以下关键概念得以推广:在大脑的感官感知背景下定义一个观念;定义观念的起源点、感官特性和常见类型;考虑身体对大脑接触观念的感官反应;以及定义大脑用于区分观念并对其进行优先级排序的关键标准。人类大脑不断接触各种观念,这些观念可以是自我产生的、由其他传感器的信息触发的,或者是从外部世界引入的。从大脑的感官角度来看,观念是有目的活动的相互竞争的可能性,如果遵循这些可能性,预计会导致未来的另一种版本。追求观念往往驱动着大多数人类活动。这需要在能量和时间的短期、中期和长期投入之间进行优先级排序。大脑的感官作用是持续评估许多相互竞争的观念,并基于动机/情感(“吸引力”)、操作/理性(“可行性”)和结果相关视角(“影响”)在它们之间进行优先级排序。接触新观念可能会引发生理和心理反应,从热情和兴奋到感到威胁或恐惧。观念可以用来动员大量人群,他们的大脑会以过度热情做出反应,有时甚至会变得狂热。对观念的吸引力、可行性和潜在影响的判断受到教育、经验和认知能力的影响。这种感官可能会通过增加专家知识和经验水平而得到强化。错误信息和虚假信息很危险,因为它们会影响大脑对观念的感知。这种内在感官的受损可能会导致一些心理健康问题。将大脑视为观念传感器的这一观点可能会引发许多定性或定量实验,以进一步探索个体和群体中这种感官的特性,从而建立“观念科学”。