Suppr超能文献

可吸收喷砂介质表面牙种植体的生存率和危险因素:一项平均随访60个月的回顾性队列研究

Survival Rates and Risk Factors of Resorbable Blast Media Surface Dental Implants: A Retrospective Cohort Study with an Average 60-Month Follow-up.

作者信息

Küçükkurt Sercan

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2025 Jul 25;40(4):408-416. doi: 10.11607/jomi.11205.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the survival rates and risk factors associated with resorbable blast media (RBM) surface dental implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1,130 RBM surface implants with hybrid macrogeometry were placed in 260 patients, with a follow-up ranging from a minimum of 26 months to a maximum of 120 months. Implant survival and failure rates were analyzed over an average 60-month follow-up. Failure rates were examined based on implant length, patient sex, and sinus elevation procedures. Additional factors such as patient age, implant placement timing (immediate vs delayed), GBR, implant diameter, and implant location were assessed to determine their impact on long-term implant success.

RESULTS

The overall survival rate for the implants was 94.4%, with most failures occurring within the first 12 months postoperatively. Male patients experienced significantly higher failure rates (7.36%) than female patients (4.0%). Short implants (8 mm) were particularly vulnerable to failure, with an 8.65% failure rate. Sinus augmentation procedures also presented an increased risk, with 10% failure for lateral sinus augmentation and 9.78% failure for crestal sinus elevation. In contrast, factors such as patient age, timing of implant placement, GBR, implant diameter, and implant location did not significantly influence failure rates. Notably, narrow-diameter implants (3.3 and 3.7 mm; n = 97) in the molar region did not increase the risk of failure, with only 5 experiencing failure. Failures after prosthetic loading were most common after about 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the long-term viability of RBM surface implants, with high survival rates when early failures are mitigated. Short implants and sinus elevation procedures pose greater risks of failure, particularly in the early stages. However, simultaneous GBR and sinus elevation procedures did not significantly impact long-term outcomes, affirming the safety and efficacy of these complex interventions.

摘要

目的

评估可吸收喷砂介质(RBM)表面牙种植体的生存率及相关风险因素。

材料与方法

共260例患者植入1130颗具有混合宏观几何形状的RBM表面种植体,随访时间最短26个月,最长120个月。在平均60个月的随访期内分析种植体的生存率和失败率。根据种植体长度、患者性别和窦提升手术情况检查失败率。评估患者年龄、种植体植入时机(即刻与延迟)、引导骨再生(GBR)、种植体直径和种植体位置等其他因素,以确定它们对种植体长期成功的影响。

结果

种植体的总体生存率为94.4%,大多数失败发生在术后12个月内。男性患者的失败率(7.36%)显著高于女性患者(4.0%)。短种植体(8mm)尤其容易失败,失败率为8.65%。窦提升手术也增加了失败风险,外侧窦提升的失败率为10%,嵴顶窦提升的失败率为9.78%。相比之下,患者年龄、种植体植入时机、GBR、种植体直径和种植体位置等因素对失败率没有显著影响。值得注意的是,磨牙区的窄直径种植体(3.3和3.7mm;n = 97)并未增加失败风险,只有5颗发生失败。修复加载后的失败最常见于约3年后。

结论

本研究证实了RBM表面种植体的长期可行性,减轻早期失败时生存率较高。短种植体和窦提升手术失败风险更大,尤其是在早期阶段。然而,同时进行GBR和窦提升手术对长期结果没有显著影响,证实了这些复杂干预措施的安全性和有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验