Reed M S, Jensen E A, Noles S, Conneely D, Kendall H, Raley M, Tarrant A, Oakley N, Hinson C, Hoare V, Marshall K, Pugliese L
Thriving Natural Capital Challenge Centre, Department of Rural Economy, Environment and Society, Scotland's Rural College, West Mains Road, Kings Buildings, Peter Wilson Building, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK.
Thriving Natural Capital Challenge Centre, Department of Rural Economy, Environment and Society, Scotland's Rural College, West Mains Road, Kings Buildings, Peter Wilson Building, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK; Institute for Methods Innovation, 77 Lower Camden Street, Dublin, D02 XE80, Ireland.
J Environ Manage. 2025 Jan;373:123437. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123437. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
Outcomes in participatory environmental processes are strongly affected by choices about who is engaged. Inclusive engagement diversifies the range of interests and perspectives represented, including those from vulnerable and marginalized groups, ultimately contributing to more socially and environmentally sustainable and equitable outcomes. However, existing "stakeholder analysis" methods often bias participant identification away from disenfranchised groups with limited pre-existing interest or influence, instead favoring the most easily accessed and influential stakeholders. This paper draws on research impact theory and practice to propose a new, more inclusive approach, adding impact to the existing interest and influence criteria (which each begin with the letter "i", hence the 3i framework) that are typically used to identify, categorize and prioritize those who are relevant to be included or excluded from engagement processes. As part of this proposed 3i analysis approach, we articulate a new typology of relevant parties to engage in environmental decision-making processes, including: uninterested; uninterested and impacted; uninterested influencers; disinterested, influential and impacted; only interested; interested and impacted; interested influencers; and interested, influential and impacted. Except for the first group, all types of relevant parties should be considered for engagement wherever possible, with participation strategies tailored to their specific 3i profile. The approach was developed and refined through a series of workshops before developing it into a survey instrument that was piloted to gather 3i data efficiently across several national contexts. Survey findings are presented for a case study identifying those relevant to wetland and peatland restoration in a Scottish catchment. If widely adopted, the 3i framework would be the most consequential change in stakeholder analysis methods since the introduction of interest-influence matrices in the 1980s.
参与式环境过程的结果受到关于参与人员选择的强烈影响。包容性参与使所代表的利益和观点范围多样化,包括弱势群体和边缘化群体的利益和观点,最终有助于实现更具社会和环境可持续性及公平性的结果。然而,现有的“利益相关者分析”方法往往使参与者识别偏向于那些预先兴趣或影响力有限的被剥夺权利群体,而更倾向于最容易接触到且最具影响力的利益相关者。本文借鉴研究影响理论和实践,提出一种新的、更具包容性的方法,在现有的通常用于识别、分类和确定参与过程中相关人员纳入或排除优先级的兴趣和影响力标准(每个标准都以字母“i”开头,因此称为3i框架)基础上增加影响因素。作为这种提议的3i分析方法的一部分,我们阐述了参与环境决策过程的相关方的新类型,包括:无兴趣的;无兴趣且受影响的;无兴趣但有影响力的;无私利、有影响力且受影响的;仅感兴趣的;感兴趣且受影响的;感兴趣且有影响力的;以及感兴趣、有影响力且受影响的。除了第一类群体外,应尽可能考虑让所有类型的相关方参与,并根据其特定的3i概况制定参与策略。该方法是通过一系列研讨会开发和完善的,之后将其发展成一种调查工具,并进行了试点,以便在多个国家背景下高效收集3i数据。针对一个案例研究展示了调查结果,该案例研究确定了与苏格兰一个集水区湿地和泥炭地恢复相关的人员。如果被广泛采用,3i框架将是自20世纪80年代引入兴趣-影响矩阵以来利益相关者分析方法中最重大的变革。