Lähde Niina, Basnyat Pabitra, Raitanen Jani, Kämppi Leena, Lehtimäki Kai, Rosti-Otajärvi Eija, Peltola Jukka
Department of Neurology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Brain Behav. 2024 Dec;14(12):e70176. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70176.
The effect of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on cognitive domain of attention and executive functions (AEFs) has not been extensively researched. This study was set up to investigate performance variability on cognitive tests assessing AEFs in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) patients receiving VNS therapy during a follow-up of up to 5 years.
Thirty-three DRE patients were assessed with the interference, maze, and written verbal fluency tests as a part of EpiTrack screening before and after VNS implantation through repeated follow-ups according to the clinical VNS protocol. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyse changes in test scores.
Maze performance improved significantly by an average of 0.20 s per month (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.365 to -0.041; p = 0.014). Interference performance improved by an average of 0.05 s per month (p = 0.207) and number of words increased by an average of 0.03 words per month (p = 0.079) on the verbal fluency test. On the maze test, patients with psychiatric comorbidities improved the most (0.52 s/month, p = 0.001), while on the interference test, patients with frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE), those taking 1-2 antiseizure medications (ASMs) and patients with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures improved the most (0.14 s/month, p = 0.005; 0.14 s/month, p = 0.033 and 0.16 s/month, p = 0.087, respectively). For verbal fluency, no clinically meaningful improvement was noted in any of the groups.
During the follow-up, maze performance markedly improved, while performance on the interference and verbal fluency tasks remained relatively stable at the group level. Accordingly, visual anticipation and planning improved during VNS therapy whereas response inhibition was unchanged at the group level despite significant enhancements in patients with FLE and those taking 1-2 ASM. Furthermore, the presence of psychiatric comorbidities correlated with even greater improvement on maze performance.
迷走神经刺激(VNS)对注意力和执行功能(AEFs)这一认知领域的影响尚未得到广泛研究。本研究旨在调查在长达5年的随访期间,接受VNS治疗的耐药性癫痫(DRE)患者在评估AEFs的认知测试中的表现变异性。
33名DRE患者在VNS植入前后,按照临床VNS方案通过重复随访,接受干扰、迷宫和书面语言流畅性测试,作为EpiTrack筛查的一部分。使用线性混合效应模型分析测试分数的变化。
迷宫表现显著改善,平均每月提高0.20秒(95%置信区间(CI):-0.365至-0.041;p = 0.014)。干扰表现平均每月提高0.05秒(p = 0.207),语言流畅性测试中的单词数量平均每月增加0.03个(p = 0.079)。在迷宫测试中,患有精神疾病共病的患者改善最大(0.52秒/月,p = 0.001),而在干扰测试中,额叶癫痫(FLE)患者、服用1 - 2种抗癫痫药物(ASM)的患者以及局灶性至双侧强直阵挛性发作的患者改善最大(分别为0.14秒/月,p = 0.005;0.14秒/月,p = 0.033和0.16秒/月,p = 0.087)。对于语言流畅性,任何组均未观察到具有临床意义的改善。
在随访期间,迷宫表现明显改善,而干扰和语言流畅性任务的表现在组水平上保持相对稳定。因此,在VNS治疗期间,视觉预期和规划能力得到改善,而尽管FLE患者和服用1 - 2种ASM的患者有显著提高,但在组水平上反应抑制能力没有变化。此外,精神疾病共病的存在与迷宫表现的更大改善相关。