Sauder Cara L, Marks Katherine L, Meyer Tanya K, Giliberto John Paul, Knutson Madeline, Wilson Emily, Stepp Cara E, Eadie Tanya L
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
J Voice. 2024 Dec 5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.11.022.
This study examined the relationship between patient-perceived vocal effort (VE) using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VE-VAS) and the OMNI Vocal Effort Scale (OMNI-VES) when measures were obtained after a vocal activity. A second purpose was to evaluate how VE related to other voice assessment measures.
Fifty-three speakers with adductor laryngeal dystonia (ADLD) provided speech recordings. Directly after this vocal activity, speakers rated VE using the VE-VAS and the OMNI-VES. Speakers provided ratings of their own voice quality severity using a 100-mm VAS (ADLD-OS) and completed the Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) scale. Ten experienced speech-language pathologists rated a subset of available speech samples (n = 39) for overall voice severity using a 100-mm VAS (SLP-OS).
There was a strong, significant correlation (r = 0.78, P < 0.001) between the VE-VAS and the OMNI-VES. Both VE measures were strongly and significantly correlated with speakers' ratings of their voice: VE-VAS vs ADLD-OS, r = 0.75, P < 0.001; OMNI-VES vs ADLD-OS, r = 0.85, P < 0.001. In contrast, mostly weak correlations were found between perceived VE and V-RQOL total and physical domains, respectively (VE-VAS vs V-RQOL: r = -0.21 to -0.19, P > 0.05; OMNI-VES vs V-RQOL: r = -0.37 to -0.44, P < 0.01). Finally, VE measures were moderately and significantly related to SLPs' auditory-perceptual measures of voice severity: VE-VAS vs SLP-OS, r = 0.50, P < 0.001; OMNI-VES vs SLP-OS, r = 0.57, P < 0.001.
ADLD speakers' perceptions of VE are strongly related when measures are obtained directly after a vocal activity, regardless of the VE scale. VE is strongly related to speaker-rated voice quality severity, but weakly related to V-RQOL. Measures of VE obtained directly after a vocal activity are moderately related to clinicians' perceptions of overall voice quality severity.
本研究探讨了在发声活动后进行测量时,使用100毫米视觉模拟量表(VE-VAS)评估的患者自我感知发声努力程度(VE)与OMNI发声努力量表(OMNI-VES)之间的关系。第二个目的是评估VE与其他嗓音评估指标之间的关系。
53名患有内收型喉肌张力障碍(ADLD)的受试者提供了语音录音。在此次发声活动后,受试者立即使用VE-VAS和OMNI-VES对VE进行评分。受试者使用100毫米VAS(ADLD-OS)对自己的嗓音质量严重程度进行评分,并完成嗓音相关生活质量(V-RQOL)量表。10名经验丰富的言语语言病理学家使用100毫米VAS(SLP-OS)对一部分可用语音样本(n = 39)的整体嗓音严重程度进行评分。
VE-VAS与OMNI-VES之间存在强且显著的相关性(r = 0.78,P < 0.001)。两种VE测量方法均与受试者对自己嗓音的评分呈强且显著的相关性:VE-VAS与ADLD-OS,r = 0.75,P < 0.001;OMNI-VES与ADLD-OS,r = 0.85,P < 0.001。相比之下,自我感知的VE与V-RQOL总分及身体领域之间的相关性大多较弱(VE-VAS与V-RQOL:r = -0.21至-0.19,P > 0.05;OMNI-VES与V-RQOL:r = -0.37至-0.44,P < 0.01)。最后,VE测量方法与言语语言病理学家对嗓音严重程度的听觉感知测量结果呈中度且显著的相关性:VE-VAS与SLP-OS,r = 0.50,P < 0.001;OMNI-VES与SLP-OS,r = 0.57,P < 0.001。
对于ADLD受试者,在发声活动后直接进行测量时,无论使用何种VE量表,他们对VE的感知都具有很强的相关性。VE与受试者自评的嗓音质量严重程度密切相关,但与V-RQOL的相关性较弱。发声活动后直接获得的VE测量结果与临床医生对整体嗓音质量严重程度的感知呈中度相关。