Eadie Tanya L, Sauder Cara L, Marks Katherine L, Knutson Madeline, Wilson Emily, Chiang Erina, Jacobson Bailey, Stepp Cara E
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2025 Jul 8;68(7):3119-3132. doi: 10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00829. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
This study determined the minimal detectable change (MDC) scores for experienced and novice listeners' ratings of overall severity of voice quality for speakers with adductor laryngeal dystonia (ADLD) and typical controls. We also determined MDCs as a function of speaker severity and listener experience.
Ten experienced listeners (ELs) and 12 novice listeners (NLs) rated overall severity of voice quality in 39 speakers with ADLD and 10 controls using a 100-mm visual analog scale across two rating sessions. MDCs at the 95% confidence level (MDC) were calculated for all speakers. MDC scores also were calculated as a function of speaker group, perceived speaker severity using averaged EL ratings as the reference standard (grouped as typical, mild, moderate, severe), and listener experience group.
The MDC for EL ratings of overall severity of voice quality for all speakers was 11.10 mm; for NLs, the MDC was 8.73 mm. As a function of speaker group, the MDC for EL ratings was 12.31 mm for speakers with ADLD ( = 39) and 0.89 mm for controls ( = 10). For NLs, the MDC was 9.32 mm for speakers with ADLD and 4.72 mm for controls. As a function of speaker severity ( 13 typical, = 9 mild, = 12 moderate, = 15 severe), MDC scores ranged from 4.22 to 13.77 mm for ELs, whereas MDC scores ranged from 4.95 mm to 12.25 mm for NLs. Across both listener groups, mildly and moderately dysphonic speakers required larger MDC scores compared to speakers without dysphonia for such differences to be considered beyond measurement error. Differences in MDC scores ranged from 1 to 4 mm between listener groups across speaker severities.
Results have implications for measuring and interpreting auditory-perceptual outcomes for speakers with ADLD with different voice quality severities when they are evaluated by ELs and NLs in clinical and research contexts.
本研究确定了经验丰富的听众和新手听众对喉内收肌肌张力障碍(ADLD)患者及典型对照者嗓音质量总体严重程度评分的最小可检测变化(MDC)分数。我们还根据说话者的严重程度和听众经验确定了MDC。
10名经验丰富的听众(ELs)和12名新手听众(NLs)使用100毫米视觉模拟量表,在两个评分阶段对39名ADLD患者和10名对照者的嗓音质量总体严重程度进行评分。计算所有说话者在95%置信水平下的MDC。MDC分数还根据说话者组、以经验丰富的听众平均评分作为参考标准感知到的说话者严重程度(分为典型、轻度、中度、重度)以及听众经验组进行计算。
所有说话者嗓音质量总体严重程度的经验丰富的听众评分的MDC为11.10毫米;新手听众的MDC为8.73毫米。根据说话者组,经验丰富的听众对ADLD患者(n = 39)评分的MDC为12.31毫米,对照者(n = 10)为0.89毫米。对于新手听众,ADLD患者的MDC为9.32毫米,对照者为4.72毫米。根据说话者严重程度(13名典型、9名轻度、12名中度、15名重度),经验丰富的听众的MDC分数范围为4.22至13.77毫米,而新手听众的MDC分数范围为4.95至12.25毫米。在两个听众组中,与无发音障碍的说话者相比,轻度和中度发音障碍的说话者需要更大的MDC分数,才能认为这种差异超出测量误差。在不同说话者严重程度下,听众组之间的MDC分数差异在1至4毫米之间。
研究结果对于在临床和研究环境中由经验丰富的听众和新手听众评估不同嗓音质量严重程度的ADLD患者的听觉感知结果的测量和解释具有启示意义。