Shimamura A P, Squire L R
Behav Neurosci. 1986 Apr;100(2):165-70. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.100.2.165.
Patients with Korsakoff's syndrome were evaluated with nine tests of new learning ability and three tests of remote memory to determine the correlation between anterograde amnesia and remote memory impairment. There was no correlation between the severity of anterograde amnesia and either the overall severity of remote memory impairment (1940s-1970s) or the impairment observed for more remote time periods (1940s-1950s). However, the correlation between remote memory impairment and anterograde amnesia became progressively stronger with the recency of the time period and was significant for the 1960s-1970s or the 1970s alone. The results support the view that the extensive remote memory impairment in Korsakoff's syndrome is, at least in part, distinct from and unrelated to anterograde amnesia. The more severe impairment observed for more recent time periods could be related to anterograde amnesia in that it reflects anterograde amnesia that was either already in place or progressively developing during recent years. The ability to recall very remote events seems therefore to depend on brain mechanisms distinct from those required for new learning or for recall of more recent events.
采用九项新学习能力测试和三项远期记忆测试对柯萨科夫综合征患者进行评估,以确定顺行性遗忘与远期记忆损害之间的相关性。顺行性遗忘的严重程度与远期记忆损害的总体严重程度(20世纪40年代至70年代)或更久远时间段(20世纪40年代至50年代)观察到的损害之间均无相关性。然而,远期记忆损害与顺行性遗忘之间的相关性随着时间段的新近程度逐渐增强,在20世纪60年代至70年代或仅在20世纪70年代时具有显著性。这些结果支持这样一种观点,即柯萨科夫综合征中广泛存在的远期记忆损害至少在部分程度上与顺行性遗忘不同且无关。在更近时间段观察到的更严重损害可能与顺行性遗忘有关,因为它反映了近年来已经存在或逐渐发展的顺行性遗忘。因此,回忆非常久远事件的能力似乎取决于与新学习或回忆更近事件所需机制不同的脑机制。