• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健专业人员对心理健康中心与市政当局跨部门合作的看法:一项定性研究。

Perspectives of healthcare professionals on cross-sectoral collaboration between mental health centers and municipalities: A qualitative study.

作者信息

Jørgensen Kim, Juhl Rikke, Hansen Morten, Lerbæk Birgitte, Frederiksen Jesper, Watson Emma, Bjerrum Merete, Karlsson Bengt

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway.

Department of People and Technology, Roskilde University, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;71(4):694-704. doi: 10.1177/00207640241299387. Epub 2024 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1177/00207640241299387
PMID:39644199
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12171049/
Abstract

AIMS

This paper aims to explore the intricacies of cross-sectoral collaboration in mental health care, focusing on the perspectives of health professionals across various disciplines. It seeks to understand how collaboration can enhance service delivery and patient outcomes while identifying existing challenges.

BACKGROUND

The evolving healthcare landscape emphasizes the importance of integrating services across sectors, particularly in mental health care, to improve continuity and efficiency of care.

DESIGN

The study utilizes qualitative methods to investigate health professionals' experiences with cross-sectoral collaboration in mental health services.

METHODS

Purposive sampling was used to select 21 health professionals for focus group discussions held at a mental health center in Region Zealand, Denmark. Data was collected through these discussions, and content analysis was performed to extract key themes. The data collection took place in 2022.

RESULTS/FINDINGS: Health professionals recognized the potential benefits of cross-sectoral collaboration, such as enhanced service delivery and improved patient outcomes. However, significant barriers were identified, including bureaucratic obstacles, communication gaps, and insufficient organizational support.

CONCLUSION

Cross-sectoral collaboration in mental health care offers significant advantages, but challenges must be addressed to fully realize its potential. Efforts should focus on policy reforms, organizational support, and fostering interdisciplinary communication to improve care delivery.

摘要

目的

本文旨在探讨精神卫生保健领域跨部门合作的复杂性,重点关注各学科卫生专业人员的观点。它试图了解合作如何能改善服务提供和患者治疗效果,同时识别现存的挑战。

背景

不断演变的医疗保健格局强调跨部门整合服务的重要性,尤其是在精神卫生保健领域,以提高护理的连续性和效率。

设计

该研究采用定性方法调查卫生专业人员在精神卫生服务中跨部门合作的经历。

方法

采用目的抽样法,选择了21名卫生专业人员,在丹麦西兰岛地区的一个精神卫生中心进行焦点小组讨论。通过这些讨论收集数据,并进行内容分析以提取关键主题。数据收集于2022年进行。

结果/发现:卫生专业人员认识到跨部门合作的潜在益处,如改善服务提供和提高患者治疗效果。然而,也发现了重大障碍,包括官僚主义障碍、沟通差距和组织支持不足。

结论

精神卫生保健领域的跨部门合作具有显著优势,但必须应对挑战才能充分发挥其潜力。应努力进行政策改革、提供组织支持并促进跨学科沟通,以改善护理服务。

相似文献

1
Perspectives of healthcare professionals on cross-sectoral collaboration between mental health centers and municipalities: A qualitative study.医疗保健专业人员对心理健康中心与市政当局跨部门合作的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;71(4):694-704. doi: 10.1177/00207640241299387. Epub 2024 Dec 7.
2
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
3
Perspectives of clinicians and screening candidates on shared decision-making in prostate cancer screening with the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a qualitative study (PROSHADE study).临床医生和筛查参与者对前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测用于前列腺癌筛查的共同决策的看法:一项定性研究(PROSHADE研究)
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 May 20;30(3):163-172. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113113.
4
A scoping review of vulvodynia research: Diagnosis, treatment, and care experiences.外阴痛研究的范围综述:诊断、治疗及护理体验
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251345946. doi: 10.1177/17455057251345946. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
5
Towards a patient-centred definition for atopic dermatitis flare: a qualitative study of adults with atopic dermatitis.迈向以患者为中心的特应性皮炎发作定义:一项特应性皮炎成人患者的定性研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jun 20;191(1):82-91. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae037.
6
Fostering collaboration: an exploration of knowledge exchange between Rongoā Māori practitioners and surgical clinicians.促进合作:探索毛利传统医学从业者与外科临床医生之间的知识交流。
ANZ J Surg. 2025 Mar;95(3):328-334. doi: 10.1111/ans.19238. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
7
Patient and Public Perceptions of 3D Technologies (Models and Images) to Facilitate Health Care Consultations: Exploratory, Mixed Methods Study.患者及公众对用于辅助医疗咨询的3D技术(模型和图像)的认知:探索性混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 18;9:e65235. doi: 10.2196/65235.
8
"There's just such a mismatch": a qualitative exploration of health systems and organizational-level barriers to accessing cancer services among people experiencing structural marginalization.“存在如此严重的不匹配”:对经历结构性边缘化的人群在获取癌症服务方面的卫生系统和组织层面障碍的定性探索。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jun 18;24(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02554-8.
9
Needs assessment for developing a train-the-trainer educational program to improve healthcare professionals' knowledge and skills in older diabetes care.为制定培训培训师教育计划以提高医疗保健专业人员在老年糖尿病护理方面的知识和技能进行需求评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Sep;138:109205. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2025.109205. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
10
Introducing the dataset for measuring centrality for sustainability-A case study of Pecinci municipality, Serbia.介绍用于衡量可持续性中心性的数据集——以塞尔维亚佩钦奇市为例
Data Brief. 2025 May 27;61:111714. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2025.111714. eCollection 2025 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Participation in Mental Health Care - Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals and Patients: A Scoping Review.患者参与精神卫生保健-医疗保健专业人员和患者的观点:范围综述。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;45(8):794-810. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2024.2358931. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
2
Health professionals' perceptions of user involvement in a mental health centre: A critical discourse analysis.健康专业人员对用户参与心理健康中心的看法:批判性话语分析。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;33(4):937-948. doi: 10.1111/inm.13296. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
3
Patients' Experiences of Participation in High-Security, Forensic Psychiatric Care.患者参与高度安全、法医精神病学护理的体验。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Jul;43(7):683-692. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2022.2033894. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
4
User involvement in adolescents' mental healthcare: a systematic review.患者参与青少年精神卫生保健:系统综述。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;31(11):1765-1788. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01818-2. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
5
User Involvement in the Handover between Mental Health Hospitals and Community Mental Health: A Critical Discourse Analysis.患者参与精神卫生机构与社区精神卫生机构交接过程:批判性话语分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 24;18(7):3352. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073352.
6
Strengthening Patient-Centered Care in the VHA: A Relational Model of Change.加强退伍军人健康管理局以患者为中心的护理:一种变革的关系模型
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 May;34(Suppl 1):7-10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04996-7.
7
Service user's actual involvement in mental health research practices: A scoping review.服务使用者实际参与精神健康研究实践:范围综述。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Aug;28(4):798-815. doi: 10.1111/inm.12594. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
8
Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: a worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination communication.目的抽样在定性证据综合中的应用:来自父母对疫苗接种沟通感知综合研究的一个实例。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 31;19(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0665-4.
9
A hands-on guide to doing content analysis.内容分析实践指南。
Afr J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
10
Involvement of people with schizophrenia in decision-making in rural Ethiopia: a qualitative study.精神分裂症患者参与农村埃塞俄比亚决策制定的情况:一项定性研究。
Global Health. 2018 Aug 22;14(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0403-4.