Li Quan, Luo Yiran, Liu Siyuan, Lu Tianle, Shi Liangliang, Ji Wei, Han Yong, Wang Hong, Nie Bingbing
School of Vehicle and Mobility, State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Green Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, Chongqing 401122, China.
Accid Anal Prev. 2025 Mar;211:107870. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107870. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
Intelligent safety systems (ISS) for autonomous vehicles, integrating advanced perception capabilities and passive protection devices, are expected to reshape traditional pedestrian safety systems and play a key role in reducing the risk of pedestrian injuries in traffic accidents. However, traditional active control and passive protection modules remain disconnected due to insufficient evidence supporting the effectiveness of collaborative strategies in integrated systems, particularly concerning activation criteria and timing. This study aims to address this gap by developing a comprehensive ISS that incorporates advanced perception systems, a vehicle dynamic control module, and controllable passive safety devices. Furthermore, the study evaluates the efficacy of trigger strategies in minimizing injury risks in various safety systems including Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB), Automatic Emergency Steering (AES), and ISS. To achieve this, we reconstructed the dynamics of pedestrian-vehicle interactions before collisions by examining 23 detailed collision cases. These cases were selected from real-world accident databases and included clear video recordings and detailed injury reports. Additionally, we analyzed the boundary conditions for collision avoidance by constructing vehicle steering and braking avoidance models. Our findings indicate that, in real-world accidents, the average Time-to-Collision (TTC) required for drivers to avoid collisions is -3.15 ± 1.00 s. In contrast, the AEB system requires -1.06 ± 0.23 s, and the AES system requires -0.44 ± 0.14 s. Building on this, we developed injury risk models for the system activation, predicting collision risks at various TTCs and pedestrian injury risks. The pedestrian injury risk prediction model effectively forecasts the risk of AIS3 + head injuries resulting from collisions between pedestrians aged 20 to 70 years and the vehicle hood. The threshold for a severe AIS3 + head injury risk is set at 10 %, with a trigger TTC of the ISS at -0.60 ± 0.20 s. When the system is activated at a TTC of -0.5 s, it can reduce the probability of severe head injury to pedestrians by 59 %. The design of the ISS shows significant potential for enhancing pedestrian safety. The findings of this research can offer guidance for the activation strategies of passive safety devices based on input signals from advanced perception systems in AVs.
用于自动驾驶车辆的智能安全系统(ISS)集成了先进的感知能力和被动保护装置,有望重塑传统的行人安全系统,并在降低交通事故中行人受伤风险方面发挥关键作用。然而,由于缺乏足够证据支持集成系统中协同策略的有效性,特别是关于激活标准和时机,传统的主动控制和被动保护模块仍然相互脱节。本研究旨在通过开发一个综合的ISS来解决这一差距,该ISS包含先进的感知系统、车辆动态控制模块和可控被动安全装置。此外,该研究评估了触发策略在最小化包括自动紧急制动(AEB)、自动紧急转向(AES)和ISS在内的各种安全系统中受伤风险方面的功效。为实现这一目标,我们通过研究23个详细的碰撞案例,重建了碰撞前行人与车辆相互作用的动力学。这些案例选自真实世界事故数据库,包括清晰的视频记录和详细的伤害报告。此外,我们通过构建车辆转向和制动避让模型,分析了碰撞避免的边界条件。我们的研究结果表明,在真实世界事故中,驾驶员避免碰撞所需的平均碰撞时间(TTC)为-3.15±1.00秒。相比之下,AEB系统需要-1.06±0.23秒,AES系统需要-0.44±0.14秒。在此基础上,我们开发了系统激活的伤害风险模型,预测了不同TTC下的碰撞风险和行人受伤风险。行人受伤风险预测模型有效地预测了20至70岁行人与车辆发动机罩碰撞导致的AIS3+头部受伤风险。严重AIS3+头部受伤风险的阈值设定为10%,ISS的触发TTC为-0.60±0.20秒。当系统在-0.5秒的TTC时激活,可以将行人严重头部受伤的概率降低59%。ISS的设计在提高行人安全方面显示出巨大潜力。本研究结果可为基于自动驾驶车辆先进感知系统输入信号的被动安全装置激活策略提供指导。