• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动紧急制动系统对行人碰撞风险的影响。

Effects of automatic emergency braking systems on pedestrian crash risk.

机构信息

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 4121 Wilson Blvd, 6(th) Floor, Arlington, VA 22203, United States.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Jul;172:106686. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106686. Epub 2022 May 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2022.106686
PMID:35580401
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Automatic emergency braking (AEB) that detects pedestrians has great potential to reduce pedestrian crashes. The objective of this study was to examine its effects on real-world police-reported crashes.

METHODS

Two methods were used to assess the effects of pedestrian-detecting AEB on pedestrian crash risk. Vehicles with and without the system were examined on models where it was an optional feature. Poisson regression was used to estimate the effects of AEB on pedestrian crash rates per insured vehicle year, and quasi-induced exposure using logistic regression compared involvement in pedestrian crashes to a system-irrelevant crash type.

RESULTS

AEB with pedestrian detection was associated with significant reductions of 25%-27% in pedestrian crash risk and 29%-30% in pedestrian injury crash risk. However, there was not evidence that that the system was effective in dark conditions without street lighting, at speed limits of 50 mph or greater, or while the AEB-equipped vehicle was turning.

CONCLUSIONS

Pedestrian-detecting AEB is reducing pedestrian crashes, but its effectiveness could be even greater. For the system to make meaningful reductions in pedestrian fatalities, it is crucial for it to work well in dark and high-speed conditions. Other proven interventions to reduce pedestrian crashes under challenging circumstances, such as improved headlights and roadway-based countermeasures, should continue to be implemented in conjunction with use of AEB to prevent pedestrian crashes most effectively.

摘要

目的

自动紧急制动(AEB)检测行人具有很大潜力可降低行人碰撞事故。本研究旨在考察其对实际警方报告碰撞事故的影响。

方法

采用两种方法评估行人检测 AEB 对行人碰撞风险的影响。在系统为可选功能的车型上,对装有和未装该系统的车辆进行了检查。泊松回归用于估计 AEB 对每辆保险车辆年行人碰撞率的影响,而准诱导暴露则使用逻辑回归将行人碰撞事故与与系统无关的碰撞类型进行比较。

结果

配备行人检测功能的 AEB 显著降低了 25%-27%的行人碰撞风险和 29%-30%的行人受伤碰撞风险。然而,没有证据表明该系统在无路灯的黑暗环境、限速 50 英里/小时或更高速度下,或在装有 AEB 的车辆转弯时有效。

结论

行人检测 AEB 正在降低行人碰撞事故,但它的有效性可能更大。为了使该系统在行人死亡方面取得有意义的减少,至关重要的是,它在黑暗和高速条件下要能良好运行。在有挑战性的情况下,应继续实施其他经过验证的降低行人碰撞事故的干预措施,如改进头灯和基于道路的对策,与 AEB 的使用相结合,以最有效地防止行人碰撞事故。

相似文献

1
Effects of automatic emergency braking systems on pedestrian crash risk.自动紧急制动系统对行人碰撞风险的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Jul;172:106686. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106686. Epub 2022 May 14.
2
Effects on crash risk of automatic emergency braking systems for pedestrians and bicyclists.自动紧急制动系统对行人和自行车碰撞风险的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(sup1):S111-S115. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2131403.
3
Estimated benefit of automated emergency braking systems for vehicle-pedestrian crashes in the United States.美国汽车-行人碰撞事故中自动紧急制动系统的估计效益。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup1):S171-S176. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1602729.
4
Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates.前方碰撞预警和自动紧急制动系统在降低前后碰撞率方面的有效性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Feb;99(Pt A):142-152. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.009. Epub 2016 Nov 26.
5
Effects of forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking on rear-end crashes involving pickup trucks.前方碰撞预警和自动紧急制动对涉及皮卡车的追尾事故的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(4):293-298. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2176191. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
6
Effectiveness of front crash prevention systems in reducing large truck real-world crash rates.正面碰撞预防系统在降低大型卡车实际碰撞率方面的有效性。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(4):284-289. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1893700. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
7
Improving the safety relevance of automatic emergency braking testing programs: An examination of common characteristics of police-reported rear-end crashes in the United States.提高自动紧急制动测试项目的安全相关性:对美国警方报告的追尾事故共同特征的考察。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(sup1):S137-S142. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2090544. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
8
Characteristics of rear-end crashes involving passenger vehicles with automatic emergency braking.涉及配备自动紧急制动系统的乘用车的追尾事故特征。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup1):S112-S118. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1576172.
9
Differential benefit of sensor system field-of-view and range in pedestrian automated emergency braking systems.行人自动紧急制动系统中传感器系统视野和范围的差异效益。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(sup1):S111-S115. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1962007. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
10
Forward collision warning system impact.前方碰撞预警系统影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(sup2):S78-S83. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1490020. Epub 2018 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining drivers injury severity for manual and automatic transmission vehicles-involved crashes: Random parameter mixed logit model with heterogeneity in means and variances.研究手动和自动变速器车辆碰撞事故中驾驶员的损伤严重程度:均值和方差具有异质性的随机参数混合逻辑模型。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 19;10(16):e36555. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36555. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
2
Driver Injury from Vehicle Side Impacts When Automatic Emergency Braking and Active Seat Belts Are Used.车辆侧面碰撞时自动紧急制动和主动安全带对驾驶员的伤害。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 22;23(13):5821. doi: 10.3390/s23135821.
3
An Emergency Driving Intervention System Designed for Driver Disability Scenarios Based on Emergency Risk Field.
基于紧急风险场的驾驶员残疾场景应急驾驶干预系统设计。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 27;20(3):2278. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032278.
4
The difference in quasi-induced exposure to crashes involving various hazardous driving actions.涉及各种危险驾驶行为的事故准暴露差异。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 2;18(2):e0279387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279387. eCollection 2023.