Sinha Shilpee, Countryman Shannon, Patel Ami, Powell Chelsea, Slaven James E, Comer Amber R, Torke Alexia M
IUH Department of Palliative Care, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN; Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
IUH Department of Palliative Care, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN.
Am J Med. 2025 May;138(5):782-788. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.11.029. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
Goals of care (GOC) documentation for seriously ill patients is integral to patient-centered care but not standardized. Collaborative efforts within the health system to improve the frequency and documentation of GOC to communicate patient preferences and values are essential to ensure both quality of life and quality of death.
We created a standard GOC note type and location in the electronic medical record for a large, statewide health system in the Midwest. Utilization and note content for all unique GOC note types documented in the first year were reviewed. A framework of GOC topics including treatment plan, prognosis, patient preferences and values, and quality of life was used to review the note content. Demographic data and outcomes including death during the observation period and hospice enrollment were also collected.
In the first year, 934 GOC notes were documented. Palliative care (PC) clinicians addressed more GOC fields compared to other clinicians (70% vs 31%, P < .0001) and had earlier discussions (median 19 days before death vs 4 days, P < .0001). Hospice was discussed more by PC (50% vs 27%, P = .0001) and PC discussions were followed by higher hospice enrollments before death (50% vs 35% P = .0166).
We successfully implemented a standard electronic medical record location for GOC notes which improved GOC documentation across a state healthcare system and found variations and gaps in fields addressed by all clinicians as well as key differences between PC clinicians vs other clinicians.
为重症患者记录护理目标(GOC)是患者中心护理的重要组成部分,但尚未标准化。卫生系统内部为提高GOC记录的频率和质量以传达患者偏好和价值观而开展的协作努力,对于确保生活质量和死亡质量至关重要。
我们为中西部一个大型全州卫生系统在电子病历中创建了标准的GOC记录类型和位置。对第一年记录的所有独特GOC记录类型的使用情况和记录内容进行了审查。使用包括治疗计划、预后、患者偏好和价值观以及生活质量在内的GOC主题框架来审查记录内容。还收集了人口统计学数据和结果,包括观察期内的死亡情况和临终关怀登记情况。
第一年记录了934份GOC记录。与其他临床医生相比,姑息治疗(PC)临床医生涉及的GOC领域更多(70%对31%,P <.0001),且讨论更早(死亡前中位数为19天对4天,P <.0001)。PC临床医生更多地讨论了临终关怀(50%对27%,P =.0001),并且PC讨论后死亡前临终关怀登记率更高(50%对35%,P =.0166)。
我们成功地在电子病历中为GOC记录实施了标准位置,这改善了全州医疗系统的GOC记录情况,并发现了所有临床医生在涉及领域方面的差异和差距,以及PC临床医生与其他临床医生之间的关键差异。