Suppr超能文献

医学肿瘤学家制定的目标关怀文件与肿瘤患者临终关怀结局。

Goals of care documentation by medical oncologists and oncology patient end-of-life care outcomes.

机构信息

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.

Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2022 Sep 15;128(18):3400-3407. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34400. Epub 2022 Jul 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Goals of care (GOC) documentation is important but underused. We aimed to improve oncologist GOC documentation and end-of-life (EOL) care.

METHODS

In April 2020, our cancer center launched a GOC note template, including optional fields for documenting discussion with the patient about: cancer natural history, goals, and/or EOL (resuscitation preferences, hospice receptivity). Associations between GOC notes and EOL care were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 1721 patients dying between June 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021, median days from first GOC note (± with documentation of EOL discussion) to death was 92, whereas a GOC note including EOL discussion ("GOC EOL note"), specifically, was 31. Patients with a first GOC note >60 days before death spent fewer days inpatient (6.7 vs 10.6 days, p < .001). Among patients with GOC EOL notes, those with such documentation >30 days before death had fewer inpatient (5 vs 11, p < .001) and intensive care unit days (0.5 vs 1.5, p < .001), more hospice referrals (57% vs 44%, p = .003), and less chemotherapy ≤14 days before death (6% vs 11%, p = .010). Of 925 admissions of patients dying within ≤30 days, those with GOC EOL notes were shorter (7 vs 9 days, p = .013) but not associated with more hospice discharge (30% vs 25%, p = .163). Oncologist (vs nononcologist) GOC documentation and earlier documentation of EOL discussion were associated in subset analyses with less inpatient care and more hospice referrals.

CONCLUSIONS

Documentation of GOC, including EOL discussions, is associated with favorable performance on accepted indicators of quality EOL care.

摘要

背景

治疗目标(GOC)的记录十分重要,但却未得到充分利用。我们旨在提高肿瘤医生对 GOC 的记录,并改善临终关怀(EOL)。

方法

在 2020 年 4 月,我们的癌症中心推出了一份 GOC 记录模板,其中包括记录与患者讨论癌症自然史、目标和/或 EOL(复苏偏好、临终关怀接受度)的可选字段。评估了 GOC 记录与 EOL 护理之间的关系。

结果

在 2020 年 6 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日期间去世的 1721 名患者中,从首次 GOC 记录(±记录 EOL 讨论)到死亡的中位数天数为 92 天,而包含 EOL 讨论的 GOC 记录(“GOC EOL 记录”)的中位数天数为 31 天。在首次 GOC 记录>60 天前死亡的患者中,住院天数更少(分别为 6.7 天和 10.6 天,p<0.001)。在有 GOC EOL 记录的患者中,在死亡前 30 天以上记录 EOL 讨论的患者,住院(5 天 vs 11 天,p<0.001)和 ICU 天数(0.5 天 vs 1.5 天,p<0.001)更少,转介到临终关怀更多(57% vs 44%,p=0.003),死亡前 14 天内接受化疗更少(6% vs 11%,p=0.010)。在 925 名在 30 天内死亡的住院患者中,有 GOC EOL 记录的患者住院时间更短(7 天 vs 9 天,p=0.013),但与更多的临终关怀出院率无关(30% vs 25%,p=0.163)。在亚组分析中,肿瘤医生(与非肿瘤医生)的 GOC 记录和更早的 EOL 讨论记录与较少的住院治疗和更多的临终关怀转介相关。

结论

记录 GOC,包括 EOL 讨论,与接受的 EOL 护理质量指标的良好表现相关。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Shifting to Serious Illness Communication.转向重症疾病沟通。
JAMA. 2022 Jan 25;327(4):321-322. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.23695.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验