• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内收肌管阻滞联合后关节囊浸润对全膝关节置换术后疼痛及恢复行走的效果:与股神经和坐骨神经阻滞的对比分析

Effectiveness of adductor canal block combined with posterior capsular infiltration on pain and return to walking after total knee arthroplasty: comparative analysis with femoral and popliteal sciatic nerves blocks.

作者信息

Knecht Siam, Tamine Lyna, Faure Nicolas, Tran Pierre, Orban Jean-Christophe, Bronsard Nicolas, Gonzalez Jean-François, Micicoi Grégoire

机构信息

Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, EFS, ADES, 13007 Marseille, France.

University Institute for Locomotion and Sports (IULS), Pasteur 2 Hospital, CHU de Nice, 30 voie Romaine, 06000 Nice, France.

出版信息

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2025 Sep;111(5):104082. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104082. Epub 2024 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104082
PMID:39645191
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Perioperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reduces morphine consumption and speeds up rehabilitation. The primary objective of this study was to compare the pain experienced by patients with an adductor canal and posterior capsule block with those with a continuous femoral nerve block combined with a popliteal sciatic nerve block. The secondary objectives were to analyze the time to recovery from early walking, length of hospital stay, and block-related complications between the two groups.

HYPOTHESIS

Patients with an adductor canal block and posterior capsular infiltration had less pain 24 h after TKA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included 774 TKA between January 2020 and March 2023. Two types of locoregional blocks were evaluated: patients who had a continuous femoral nerve block with a single-shot popliteal sciatic nerve block (FN-PSN group) operated on before March 2022 and those who had a single-shot adductor canal block combined with posterior capsular infiltration (ACB-PI group) operated on after March 2022. One patient in the ACB-PI group was matched to two patients in the NF-BS group according to sex, age, and BMI. A total of 725 TKA were included: 500 in the FN-PSN group and 225 in the ACB-PI group. The primary endpoint was pain assessed using the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and opioid consumption at 24 h after TKA. Resumption of walking, defined as getting up for the first time and walking ten steps until discharge from the hospital, and complications between the two groups were also assessed. The study population consisted of 471 women (64.9%) with a mean age of 72.2 ± 8.2 years and a mean BMI of 28.2 ± 4.6.

RESULTS

Patients in the FN-PSN group had less pain at NPRS (1.3 versus 1.9; p < 0.001), and fewer patients required morphine titration (13.8% versus 6.8%, p = 0.02) within the first 8 h of surgery with no difference at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. The mean doses of morphine administered were similar between the groups. Resumption of walking was significantly longer in the FN-PSN group (1.5 versus 2.0 days, p = 0.003), and hospitalization times and complications were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Adductor canal block combined with posterior capsular infiltration did not reduce postoperative pain compared with femoral and popliteal sciatic block at 24 h after TKA. Opioid consumption and pain were similar between the groups, with more patients requiring morphine in the first eight hours in the ACB-PI group but with a faster return to walking.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; comparative study.

摘要

引言

全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的围手术期镇痛可减少吗啡用量并加速康复。本研究的主要目的是比较接受收肌管和后关节囊阻滞的患者与接受连续股神经阻滞联合腘坐骨神经阻滞的患者所经历的疼痛。次要目的是分析两组患者从早期步行恢复的时间、住院时间以及与阻滞相关的并发症。

假设

接受收肌管阻滞和后关节囊浸润的患者在TKA后24小时疼痛较轻。

材料与方法

这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2020年1月至2023年3月期间的774例TKA。评估了两种局部阻滞类型:2022年3月之前接受连续股神经阻滞加单次腘坐骨神经阻滞的患者(FN-PSN组)和2022年3月之后接受单次收肌管阻滞联合后关节囊浸润的患者(ACB-PI组)。根据性别、年龄和BMI,将ACB-PI组的1例患者与FN-BS组的2例患者进行匹配。总共纳入了725例TKA:FN-PSN组500例,ACB-PI组225例。主要终点是使用数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)评估的疼痛以及TKA后24小时的阿片类药物用量。还评估了两组患者的步行恢复情况(定义为首次起床并行走十步直至出院)和并发症。研究人群包括471名女性(64.9%),平均年龄为72.2±8.2岁,平均BMI为28.2±4.6。

结果

FN-PSN组患者的NPRS疼痛评分较低(1.3对1.9;p<0.001),并且在手术的前8小时内需要吗啡滴定的患者较少(13.8%对6.8%,p = 0.02),但在24小时、48小时和72小时时无差异。两组之间给予的吗啡平均剂量相似。FN-PSN组的步行恢复时间明显更长(1.5天对2.0天,p = 0.003),两组之间的住院时间和并发症相似。

结论

与TKA后24小时的股神经和腘坐骨神经阻滞相比,收肌管阻滞联合后关节囊浸润并没有减轻术后疼痛。两组之间的阿片类药物用量和疼痛相似,ACB-PI组在前八小时内需要吗啡的患者更多,但步行恢复更快。

证据级别

III;比较研究。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of adductor canal block combined with posterior capsular infiltration on pain and return to walking after total knee arthroplasty: comparative analysis with femoral and popliteal sciatic nerves blocks.内收肌管阻滞联合后关节囊浸润对全膝关节置换术后疼痛及恢复行走的效果:与股神经和坐骨神经阻滞的对比分析
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2025 Sep;111(5):104082. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104082. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
2
Femoral nerve blocks for acute postoperative pain after knee replacement surgery.膝关节置换术后急性疼痛的股神经阻滞
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 13;2014(5):CD009941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009941.pub2.
3
Combined femoral and sciatic nerve block versus femoral and local infiltration anesthesia for pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.全膝关节置换术后联合股神经和坐骨神经阻滞与股神经阻滞及局部浸润麻醉用于疼痛控制的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Dec 7;11(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0495-6.
4
Comparison of analgesic efficacy, anti-inflammatory effect, and myotoxicity of ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block and adductor canal with IPACK combination in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia: A prospective observational study.脊髓麻醉下全膝关节置换术患者中超声引导下腹股沟上髂筋膜阻滞与内收肌管联合IPACK的镇痛效果、抗炎作用及肌毒性比较:一项前瞻性观察研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 8;104(32):e43719. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043719.
5
Comparison of local infiltration analgesia and sciatic nerve block as an adjunct to femoral nerve block for pain control after total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.全膝关节置换术后局部浸润镇痛与坐骨神经阻滞辅助股神经阻滞用于疼痛控制的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 May;96(19):e6829. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006829.
6
The comparison of adductor canal block with femoral nerve block following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.全膝关节置换术后内收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Anesth. 2016 Oct;30(5):745-54. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2194-1. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
7
Does the addition of iPACK to adductor canal block in the presence or absence of periarticular local anesthetic infiltration improve analgesic and functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis.在关节周围局部麻醉浸润存在或不存在的情况下,向收肌管阻滞中加入 iPACK 是否能改善全膝关节置换术后的镇痛和功能结果?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Aug;46(8):713-721. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102705. Epub 2021 May 14.
8
Analgesic benefits of single-shot versus continuous adductor canal block for total knee arthroplasty: a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.全膝关节置换术中单次注射与持续股内收肌管阻滞的镇痛效果:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Feb;48(2):49-60. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103756. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
9
Postoperative pain relief after total knee arthroplasty: A Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review of analgesic strategies based on nerve blocks.全膝关节置换术后的疼痛缓解:基于神经阻滞的镇痛策略的贝叶斯网状meta 分析和系统评价。
J Clin Anesth. 2024 Sep;96:111490. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111490. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
10
Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Network Meta-Analysis.收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞在全膝关节置换术中的比较:网状荟萃分析。
Clin J Pain. 2024 Jul 1;40(7):447-457. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001214.

引用本文的文献

1
Regional Anesthesia for Orthopedic Surgeries: A Guide for Upper and Lower Extremity Procedures.骨科手术的区域麻醉:上下肢手术指南
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2025 Mar 31;17:133570. doi: 10.52965/001c.133570. eCollection 2025.