Johnson Victoria E, Stanley Laura E, Troop-Gordon Wendy
Creighton University, School of Medicine, CL and Rachel Werner Center for Health Sciences Education, 2616 Burt Street, Omaha, NE 68178, United States.
Department of Special Education, Rehabilitation, and Counseling, Auburn University, College of Education, 3084 Haley Center, Auburn, AL 36849, United States.
J Sch Psychol. 2024 Dec;107:101388. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101388. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
Recent research has underscored the importance of teachers' responses to students' peer victimization as well as students' expectations for how their teacher responds to this victimization. However, little research has examined the extent to which teachers and their students have a shared understanding of their teacher's efforts, or lack of efforts, to manage peer victimization. This study addressed this issue using longitudinal data collected on 410 students (47.1% boys; 86.8% White; M = 10.29 years) from 26 fourth-grade and fifth-grade classrooms. In the fall and spring, students reported on their teacher's use of six responses to peer victimization and teachers completed self-reports of their use of these same six responses. Peer reports of aggressive behavior and peer victimization were obtained in the fall. Significant agreement among classmates was found for only three teacher responses, including contacting parents, advising independent coping (i.e., telling the student to handle it on their own), and suggesting avoidance, and there was little indication that there was greater agreement among same-gender classmates or among children either high or low in aggression or peer victimization. Overall, there was little association between teachers and their students as to the teachers' uses of the six response strategies. Based on these findings, fostering a shared understanding of the consequences and expectations regarding students' engagement in bullying should be examined as a potential target of anti-bullying interventions.
最近的研究强调了教师对学生同伴受害情况的反应以及学生对教师如何应对这种受害情况的期望的重要性。然而,很少有研究考察教师和学生在多大程度上对教师管理同伴受害情况的努力(或缺乏努力)有共同的理解。本研究使用从26个四年级和五年级教室的410名学生(47.1%为男生;86.8%为白人;平均年龄10.29岁)收集的纵向数据来解决这个问题。在秋季和春季,学生报告了教师对同伴受害情况的六种反应的使用情况,教师完成了关于他们使用这六种相同反应的自我报告。在秋季获得了攻击性行为和同伴受害情况的同伴报告。仅在三种教师反应中发现了同学之间的显著一致性,包括联系家长、建议独立应对(即告诉学生自己处理)和建议回避,几乎没有迹象表明同性别的同学之间或攻击性行为或同伴受害情况高或低的儿童之间有更大的一致性。总体而言,教师和学生在教师使用六种反应策略方面几乎没有关联。基于这些发现,培养对学生参与欺凌行为的后果和期望的共同理解应作为反欺凌干预措施的潜在目标进行研究。