• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Role of School Context in Implementing a Statewide Anti-Bullying Policy and Protecting Students.学校环境在实施全州反欺凌政策及保护学生方面的作用。
Educ Policy (Los Altos Calif). 2018 Jun;32(4):507-539. doi: 10.1177/0895904816637689. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
2
Reducing Educators' Weight Bias: The Role of School-Based Anti-Bullying Policies.减少教育者的体重偏见:基于学校的反欺凌政策的作用。
J Sch Health. 2021 Oct;91(10):796-801. doi: 10.1111/josh.13068. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
3
Does Implementation Matter? Associations Between Implementation of Maine's Anti- Bullying Law and Bullying Victimization Among High School Youth.实施是否重要?缅因州反欺凌法的实施与高中青少年受欺凌之间的关联。
J Adolesc Health. 2024 Jan;74(1):161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.08.011. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
4
Are school policies focused on sexual orientation and gender identity associated with less bullying? Teachers' perspectives.关注性取向和性别认同的学校政策是否与较少的欺凌行为相关?教师的观点。
J Sch Psychol. 2016 Feb;54:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
5
A Multilevel, Statewide Investigation of School District Anti-Bullying Policy Quality and Student Bullying Involvement.一项关于学区反欺凌政策质量与学生欺凌行为参与情况的全州范围多层次调查。
J Sch Health. 2017 Mar;87(3):174-181. doi: 10.1111/josh.12480.
6
A mixed method investigation of teacher-identified barriers, facilitators and recommendations to implementing daily physical activity in Ontario elementary schools.安大略省小学实施日常身体活动的教师认定障碍、促进因素及建议的混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 31;22(1):1986. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14359-3.
7
Examining the Link Between Implementation Fidelity, Quality, and Effectiveness of Teacher-Delivered Anti-Bullying Interventions in a Randomized Controlled Trial.考察随机对照试验中教师实施反欺凌干预的实施保真度、质量与效果之间的关系。
Prev Sci. 2024 Apr;25(3):407-420. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01580-8. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
8
The Effectiveness of Policy Interventions for School Bullying: A Systematic Review.学校欺凌政策干预措施的有效性:一项系统综述
J Soc Social Work Res. 2017 Spring;8(1):45-69. doi: 10.1086/690565. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
9
School and classroom effects on Daily Physical Activity (DPA) policy implementation fidelity in Ontario classrooms: a multi-level analysis.学校和课堂对安大略省课堂每日身体活动(DPA)政策实施一致性的影响:多层次分析。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 27;18(1):802. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5720-2.
10
Evaluation of Daily Physical Activity (DPA) policy implementation in Ontario: surveys of elementary school administrators and teachers.安大略省日常体育活动(DPA)政策实施情况评估:对小学管理人员和教师的调查
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 8;16:746. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3423-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of teachers' responses to children's peer victimization: Agreement (and lack of agreement) among teachers and students.教师对儿童同伴受害情况反应的认知:教师与学生之间的共识(以及缺乏共识)
J Sch Psychol. 2024 Dec;107:101388. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101388. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
2
Trends in Secondary School Practices Related to Violence Prevention, 2012-2018.2012-2018 年与预防暴力相关的中学实践趋势。
J Sch Health. 2022 Sep;92(9):882-887. doi: 10.1111/josh.13195. Epub 2022 May 17.
3
Prevalence and factors associated with bullying phenomenon among pre-adolescents attending first-grade secondary schools of Palermo, Italy, and a comparative systematic literature review.意大利巴勒莫一级中学的青春期前儿童中欺凌现象的流行率及其相关因素,以及一项比较系统的文献综述。
Ital J Pediatr. 2022 Apr 4;48(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13052-022-01245-2.
4
The Effect of an Anti-Bullying Intervention on Male Students' Bullying-victimization Behaviors and Social Competence: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Deprived Urban Areas.一项反欺凌干预措施对男学生欺凌-受欺凌行为及社会能力的影响:在城市贫困地区进行的随机对照试验
J Res Health Sci. 2019 Oct 21;19(4):e00461.
5
Socio-Psychological Safety of Schools in the Context of the Settlement Type and Socio-Economic Status of the Region.地区定居类型和社会经济地位背景下学校的社会心理安全
Behav Sci (Basel). 2019 Dec 5;9(12):139. doi: 10.3390/bs9120139.
6
School Bullying in Compulsory and Advanced Secondary Education. Determining Factors in its Intervention.义务制和高级中等教育中的校园欺凌。干预的决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 1;16(5):750. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050750.
7
Prevalence of the bullying phenomenon in a schools sample of Palermo, Sicily: a pre-post intervention observational study among teachers.西西里岛巴勒莫市学校样本中欺凌现象的发生率:一项针对教师的干预前后观察性研究。
Acta Biomed. 2018 Oct 8;89(3):443-451. doi: 10.23750/abm.v89i3.7575.
8
The Effectiveness of Policy Interventions for School Bullying: A Systematic Review.学校欺凌政策干预措施的有效性:一项系统综述
J Soc Social Work Res. 2017 Spring;8(1):45-69. doi: 10.1086/690565. Epub 2017 Jan 26.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effectiveness of Policy Interventions for School Bullying: A Systematic Review.学校欺凌政策干预措施的有效性:一项系统综述
J Soc Social Work Res. 2017 Spring;8(1):45-69. doi: 10.1086/690565. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
2
Initial Development and Validation of the BullyHARM: The Bullying, Harassment, and Aggression Receipt Measure.《霸凌伤害量表(BullyHARM)的初步开发与验证:霸凌、骚扰及攻击行为受侵害测量量表》
Psychol Sch. 2016 Nov;53(9):984-1000. doi: 10.1002/pits.21957. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
3
Opioid abuse in the United States and Department of Health and Human Services actions to address opioid-drug-related overdoses and deaths.美国的阿片类药物滥用情况以及美国卫生与公众服务部为应对与阿片类药物相关的过量用药和死亡所采取的行动。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2015 Jun;29(2):133-9. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2015.1037530.
4
Teachers' and Education Support Professionals' Perspectives on Bullying and Prevention: Findings From a National Education Association Study.教师和教育支持专业人员对欺凌行为及其预防的看法:一项全国教育协会研究的结果
School Psych Rev. 2013;42(3):280-297.
5
Teacher-Child Relationships from Kindergarten to Sixth Grade: Early childhood predictors of teacher-perceived conflict and closeness.从幼儿园到六年级的师生关系:教师所感知到的冲突与亲密关系的幼儿期预测因素。
Soc Dev. 2009 Nov;18(4):915-945. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00508.x.
6
Youth risk behavior surveillance--United States, 2013.2013年美国青少年危险行为监测
MMWR Suppl. 2014 Jun 13;63(4):1-168.
7
Bullying victimization at school and headache: a meta-analysis of observational studies.学校中的欺凌受害经历与头痛:观察性研究的荟萃分析
Headache. 2014 Jun;54(6):976-86. doi: 10.1111/head.12344. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
8
Principled missing data methods for researchers.面向研究人员的有原则的缺失数据处理方法。
Springerplus. 2013 May 14;2(1):222. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-222. Print 2013 Dec.
9
Adult psychiatric outcomes of bullying and being bullied by peers in childhood and adolescence.儿童和青少年时期被同伴欺凌和欺凌他人与成年后的精神科结局。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;70(4):419-26. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.504.
10
School bullying: development and some important challenges.校园欺凌:发展与一些重要挑战
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:751-80. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516. Epub 2013 Jan 3.

学校环境在实施全州反欺凌政策及保护学生方面的作用。

The Role of School Context in Implementing a Statewide Anti-Bullying Policy and Protecting Students.

作者信息

Hall William J, Chapman Mimi V

机构信息

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.

出版信息

Educ Policy (Los Altos Calif). 2018 Jun;32(4):507-539. doi: 10.1177/0895904816637689. Epub 2016 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1177/0895904816637689
PMID:29930440
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6007981/
Abstract

Bullying is a significant problem in U.S. schools. Policies have been developed to reduce bullying, yet policy implementation by educators is an essential yet difficult and complex process. Few studies have investigated factors that act as barriers to or facilitators of bullying policy implementation and teacher protection of students. This study examined the influence of school context on educators' capacity to implement a statewide bullying law and protect students from bullying following the enactment of the policy. Data were collected from 505 educators in 324 schools. School administrators tended to rate fidelity of policy implementation and teacher protection of students higher than teachers, education support professionals, and student service professionals. Policy implementation fidelity scores were higher in high schools than elementary schools. School size and the prevalence of student suspensions were inversely related to implementation fidelity. Higher levels of teacher protection were reported in elementary schools.

摘要

欺凌是美国学校中的一个重大问题。虽然已经制定了相关政策来减少欺凌现象,但教育工作者对政策的实施是一个至关重要却又困难复杂的过程。很少有研究调查那些阻碍或促进欺凌政策实施以及教师对学生保护的因素。本研究考察了学校环境对教育工作者实施一项全州范围欺凌法以及在该政策颁布后保护学生免受欺凌能力的影响。数据收集自324所学校的505名教育工作者。学校管理人员对政策实施的忠诚度以及教师对学生的保护程度的评分往往高于教师、教育支持人员和学生服务人员。高中的政策实施忠诚度得分高于小学。学校规模和学生停学率与实施忠诚度呈负相关。小学报告的教师保护水平更高。