• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparing Safety and Accuracy of Standardised Versus Subjective Triage Code Assignment by Nurses: A Multicenter Observational Simulated Study.

作者信息

Zaboli Arian, Brigo Francesco, Brigiari Gloria, Massar Magdalena, Magnarelli Gabriele, Pfeifer Norbert, Garbin Tiziano, Clauser Patrick, Sibilio Serena, Turcato Gianni

机构信息

Innovation, Research and Teaching Service (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical Private University (PMU), Bolzano, Italy.

Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2024 Dec 8. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17615.

DOI:10.1111/jocn.17615
PMID:39648140
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standardised triage systems have been in place for decades with minor modifications, while nurses' skills and knowledge have significantly advanced.

AIM

To determine whether nurses' clinical expertise outperforms triage systems in simulated clinical cases.

DESIGN

A multicenter simulated observational study.

METHODS

The study was conducted from January 1, 2024 to March 31, 2024, in four Italian emergency departments, enrolling triage-performing nurses. Thirty clinical cases, based on real patients representing daily emergency department influx, were reconstructed. The primary outcome was the agreement between the triage code assigned by the Manchester Triage System and the code assigned based on clinical expertise. The secondary outcome compared the predictive ability of the codes assigned by nurses regarding clinical outcomes, such as death within 72 h, the need for hospitalisation, and the need for life-saving intervention. The study was reported in accordance with the STROBE statement.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven triage nurses completed the 30 vignettes. The agreement between the MTS-assigned code and the clinical expertise triage reported a Cohen's kappa of 0.576 (95% CI: 0.564-0.598). For death within 72 h, the clinical expertise code reported better results than the Manchester Triage System. For life-saving interventions, the Manchester Triage System reported a lower performance than clinical expertise. The variability in triage code assignment was higher for clinical expertise compared to the Manchester Triage System.

CONCLUSIONS

Triage codes assigned by nurses based on clinical expertise perform better in terms of clinical outcomes, suggesting a need to update triage systems to incorporate nurses' knowledge and skills. However, standardised triage systems should be maintained to reduce variability and ensure consistent patient classification.

REPORTING METHOD

The study was conducted and reported according to the STROBE statement.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparing Safety and Accuracy of Standardised Versus Subjective Triage Code Assignment by Nurses: A Multicenter Observational Simulated Study.
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Dec 8. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17615.
2
Reproducibility of the Manchester Triage System: a multicentre vignette study.
Emerg Med J. 2025 May 22;42(6):403-410. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214213.
3
Assessing triage efficiency in Italy: a comparative study using simulated cases among nurses.评估意大利的分诊效率:一项在护士中使用模拟病例的比较研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03735-z.
4
Assessing sensitivity and specificity of the Manchester Triage System in the evaluation of acute coronary syndrome in adult patients in emergency care: a systematic review protocol.评估曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊护理中评估成年急性冠状动脉综合征患者时的敏感性和特异性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):64-73. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2213.
5
Human intelligence versus Chat-GPT: who performs better in correctly classifying patients in triage?人类智能与Chat-GPT:在分诊中对患者进行正确分类时谁表现得更好?
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 May;79:44-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.02.008. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
6
Enhancing triage accuracy: The influence of nursing education on risk prediction.提高分诊准确率:护理教育对风险预测的影响。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2024 Aug;75:101486. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101486. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
7
The Manchester Triage System's performance in clinical risk prioritisation of patients presenting with headache in emergency department: A retrospective observational study.《曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊科头痛患者临床风险分层中的表现:一项回顾性观察研究》
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Sep;31(17-18):2553-2561. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16073. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
8
Performance of the Manchester Triage System in patients with dyspnoea: A retrospective observational study.曼彻斯特分诊系统在呼吸困难患者中的表现:一项回顾性观察研究。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2020 Nov;53:100931. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2020.100931. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
9
Reliability and validity of the Manchester Triage System in a general emergency department patient population in the Netherlands: results of a simulation study.荷兰综合急诊科患者群体中曼彻斯特分诊系统的可靠性和有效性:一项模拟研究的结果
Emerg Med J. 2008 Jul;25(7):431-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.055228.
10
Exploring the Variability in Triage Nursing Workload: Insights From a Multicentre Observational Study.探索分诊护理工作量的变异性:一项多中心观察性研究的见解
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Nov 12. doi: 10.1111/jan.16627.