Krennmair Stefan, Weinländer Michael, Malek Michael, Forstner Thomas, Stimmelmayr Michael, Krennmair Gerald
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Keplerklinikum Linz, Johannes Kepler University (JKU) Linz, Linz, Austria.
NumBiolab Research Associate, Ludwig-Maximilian University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Mar;36(3):353-365. doi: 10.1111/clr.14387. Epub 2024 Dec 8.
To evaluate the performance and clinical outcome of vertical and horizontal bone augmentation (VHBA) in posterior maxillary regions combining lateral window sinus floor elevation (LWSFE) with a horizontal bone shell technique applying the maxillary facial sinus wall as a bone plate.
In 18 patients, LWSFE was combined with a horizontal bone shield augmentation procedure utilizing the maxillary facial sinus bone wall as a lateral bone plate. Both the sinus cavity and the lateral bone box created were grafted with a mixture of autogenous bone/venous blood and bovine bone mineral. The primary aim was to assess the performance of combined techniques enabling subsequent implant placement. Using radiographic measurements (preoperative, after VHBA, at implant placement, and at follow-up), bone gain/reduction of augmented horizontal ridge width (HRW) and vertical bone height (VBH) were evaluated. Additionally, clinical outcome assessing implant survival/success rate, marginal bone loss (MBL), and implant health (mucositis/peri-implantitis) was evaluated.
For the combined VHBA techniques, HRW and VBH increased significantly (p < 0.001) from preoperative 3.5 ± 1.4 mm/3.6 ± 2.1 mm to 9.7 ± 1.9 mm/18.0 ± 1.6 mm post-augmentation. However, HRW and VBH dimensions decreased up to 8.9 ± 1.8 mm/17.1 ± 1.4 mm at implant placement and 8.6 ± 1.7 mm/16.7 ± 1.3 mm at follow-up evaluation (3.8 ± 1.8 years; p < 0.001, respectively). Augmented bone reduction was significantly higher (-7.7%) between the augmentation procedure and implant placement than in the post-implant-placement period (-2.5%). All implants survived (100%) representing peri-implant MBL of -0.9 ± 0.7 mm, pocket depth of 3.4 + 1.8 mm, and prevalences of 5%/0% for peri-implant mucositis/peri-implantitis.
The combination of horizontal bone augmentation using local bone shield transfer from the maxillary facial sinus wall with LWSFE enables sufficient reconstruction of maxillary posterior ridge.
评估在上颌后牙区将外侧开窗式上颌窦底提升术(LWSFE)与应用上颌面部窦壁作为骨板的水平骨壳技术相结合的垂直和水平骨增量术(VHBA)的性能及临床效果。
对18例患者采用LWSFE并结合利用上颌面部窦骨壁作为外侧骨板的水平骨板增量术。对上颌窦腔和所形成的外侧骨盒均植入自体骨/静脉血与牛骨矿物质的混合物。主要目的是评估联合技术为后续种植体植入创造条件的性能。通过影像学测量(术前、VHBA术后、种植体植入时及随访时),评估水平牙槽嵴宽度(HRW)和垂直骨高度(VBH)的骨增量/减少情况。此外,评估临床效果,包括种植体存活率/成功率、边缘骨吸收(MBL)及种植体健康状况(黏膜炎/种植体周围炎)。
对于联合VHBA技术,HRW和VBH从术前的3.5±1.4mm/3.6±2.1mm显著增加(p<0.001)至增量术后的9.7±1.9mm/18.0±1.6mm。然而,在种植体植入时HRW和VBH尺寸分别降至8.9±1.8mm/17.1±1.4mm,在随访评估时(3.8±1.8年;p<0.001)降至8.6±1.7mm/16.7±1.3mm。增量术后至种植体植入期间的骨量减少(-7.7%)显著高于种植体植入后阶段(-2.5%)。所有种植体均存活(100%),种植体周围MBL为-0.9±0.7mm,牙周袋深度为3.4+1.8mm,种植体周围黏膜炎/种植体周围炎的发生率分别为5%/0%。
将上颌面部窦壁的局部骨板转移与LWSFE相结合的水平骨增量技术能够对上颌后牙区牙槽嵴进行充分重建。