• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物治疗对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者生活质量的长期增量效益而非死亡率:一项网状荟萃分析。

Incremental long-term benefit of drug therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in quality of life but not mortality: a network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Pan Qiong, Sun Jiongzhou, Gao Shiyuan, Liu Zian, Huang Yiwen, Lian Yixin

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.

出版信息

Arch Med Sci. 2024 May 28;20(5):1586-1596. doi: 10.5114/aoms/183025. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.5114/aoms/183025
PMID:39649253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11623174/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The latest evidence revealed that dupilumab, an interleukin-4 (IL-4) and interleukin-13 (IL-13) blocker, significantly reduces the exacerbation risk in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The efficacy of dupilumab compared with conventional inhaled drugs remains incompletely determined. This study aimed to investigate the comparative efficacy of dupilumab and conventional inhaled drugs in patients with stable COPD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study retrieved randomised clinical trials (RCTs) with follow-up ≥ 48 weeks on long-acting β-agonists (LABAs), long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonists (LAMAs), inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), and dupilumab in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. The information on eligible studies was extracted after the screening. The comparative efficacy of 4 drugs and their combinations in acute exacerbation and mortality was assessed using Bayesian network meta-analysis models.

RESULTS

This network meta-analysis identified 69 eligible RCTs on 7 classes of drug therapies after stepwise screening and included 125,331 COPD patients. Compared with placebo, the 7 drug interventions significantly reduced the risk of acute exacerbation, and the reduction degree increased with the incremental use of drug classes. ICS/LABA/LAMA/dupilumab was the most effective in decreasing exacerbation risk (OR = 0.561 [95% CI: 0.387-0.810]), followed by ICS/LABA/LAMA (OR = 0.717 [95% CI: 0.626-0.817]). The 7 drug therapies were not significantly associated with a lower risk of death compared to placebo. Nevertheless, ICS/LABA/LAMA/dupilumab is the most likely to be effective in decreasing mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The incremental use of combinations of conventional and novel drugs contributed to the long-term benefits in acute exacerbation but not death in COPD. The optimal drug combination in terms of acute COPD exacerbation was ICS/LABA/LAMA/dupilumab.

摘要

引言

最新证据显示,度普利尤单抗(一种白细胞介素-4(IL-4)和白细胞介素-13(IL-13)阻滞剂)可显著降低慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的急性加重风险。度普利尤单抗与传统吸入药物相比的疗效仍未完全确定。本研究旨在探讨度普利尤单抗与传统吸入药物对稳定期COPD患者的相对疗效。

材料与方法

本研究在PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库数据库中检索了关于长效β受体激动剂(LABA)、长效毒蕈碱受体拮抗剂(LAMA)、吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)和度普利尤单抗且随访时间≥48周的随机临床试验(RCT)。筛选后提取符合条件研究的信息。使用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析模型评估4种药物及其组合在急性加重和死亡率方面的相对疗效。

结果

经过逐步筛选,该网络荟萃分析确定了7类药物治疗的69项符合条件的RCT,纳入了125331例COPD患者。与安慰剂相比,这7种药物干预均显著降低了急性加重风险,且随着药物种类使用的增加,降低程度增大。ICS/LABA/LAMA/度普利尤单抗在降低急性加重风险方面最有效(OR = 0.561 [95% CI:0.387 - 0.810]),其次是ICS/LABA/LAMA(OR = 0.717 [95% CI:0.626 - 0.817])。与安慰剂相比,这7种药物治疗与较低的死亡风险无显著相关性。然而,ICS/LABA/LAMA/度普利尤单抗在降低死亡率方面最有可能有效。

结论

传统药物与新型药物联合使用的增加有助于COPD患者在急性加重方面获得长期益处,但对死亡率无影响。就COPD急性加重而言,最佳药物组合是ICS/LABA/LAMA/度普利尤单抗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/444f/11623174/be8670237d0f/AMS-20-5-183025-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/444f/11623174/c70c76b56341/AMS-20-5-183025-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/444f/11623174/6d3123a7c520/AMS-20-5-183025-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/444f/11623174/09abb92592a3/AMS-20-5-183025-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/444f/11623174/b1002d2d259b/AMS-20-5-183025-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/444f/11623174/2febdf05ad18/AMS-20-5-183025-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/444f/11623174/be8670237d0f/AMS-20-5-183025-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/444f/11623174/c70c76b56341/AMS-20-5-183025-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/444f/11623174/6d3123a7c520/AMS-20-5-183025-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/444f/11623174/09abb92592a3/AMS-20-5-183025-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/444f/11623174/b1002d2d259b/AMS-20-5-183025-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/444f/11623174/2febdf05ad18/AMS-20-5-183025-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/444f/11623174/be8670237d0f/AMS-20-5-183025-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Incremental long-term benefit of drug therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in quality of life but not mortality: a network meta-analysis.药物治疗对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者生活质量的长期增量效益而非死亡率:一项网状荟萃分析。
Arch Med Sci. 2024 May 28;20(5):1586-1596. doi: 10.5114/aoms/183025. eCollection 2024.
2
Long-acting inhaled therapy (beta-agonists, anticholinergics and steroids) for COPD: a network meta-analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的长效吸入疗法(β受体激动剂、抗胆碱能药物和类固醇):一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 26;2014(3):CD010844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010844.pub2.
3
Comparisons of exacerbations and mortality among regular inhaled therapies for patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.比较稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者常规吸入治疗的恶化和死亡率:系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2019 Nov 15;16(11):e1002958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002958. eCollection 2019 Nov.
4
Dual combination therapy versus long-acting bronchodilators alone for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review and network meta-analysis.双重联合疗法与长效支气管扩张剂单药治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的疗效比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 3;12(12):CD012620. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012620.pub2.
5
Long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) plus long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) versus LABA plus inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)联合长效β-激动剂(LABA)与 LABA 联合吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)治疗稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 5;6(6):CD012066. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012066.pub3.
6
Once daily long-acting beta2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists in a combined inhaler versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.每日一次长效β2受体激动剂与长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂联合吸入器治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病对比安慰剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 6;3(3):CD012930. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012930.pub2.
7
Comparative Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Other Bronchodilators for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.乌美溴铵/维兰特罗与其他支气管扩张剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效比较:一项网络荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2022 Nov;39(11):4961-5010. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02234-x. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
8
Inhaled corticosteroids with combination inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.吸入性皮质类固醇联合吸入长效β2-激动剂和长效抗胆碱能药物治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 6;12(12):CD011600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011600.pub3.
9
Long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) plus long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) versus LABA plus inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)联合长效β受体激动剂(LABA)与LABA联合吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)用于稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 10;2(2):CD012066. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012066.pub2.
10
Comparisons of Efficacy and Safety between Triple (Inhaled Corticosteroid/Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist/Long-Acting Beta-Agonist) Therapies in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.三种(吸入皮质激素/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂/长效β-激动剂)疗法治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Respiration. 2021;100(7):631-643. doi: 10.1159/000515133. Epub 2021 May 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomass-related PM induced inflammatory microenvironment via IL-17F/IL-17RC axis.与生物量相关的细颗粒物通过白细胞介素-17F/白细胞介素-17受体C轴诱导炎症微环境。
Environ Pollut. 2024 Feb 1;342:123048. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123048. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
2
Dupilumab for COPD with Type 2 Inflammation Indicated by Eosinophil Counts.针对嗜酸性粒细胞计数提示 2 型炎症的 COPD,应用度普利尤单抗。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jul 20;389(3):205-214. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2303951. Epub 2023 May 21.
3
Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2023 Report: GOLD Executive Summary.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议组织2023年报告:《慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议》执行摘要
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Apr 1;207(7):819-837. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202301-0106PP.
4
Further evidence of a type 2 inflammatory signature in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or emphysema.慢性阻塞性肺疾病或肺气肿中 2 型炎症特征的进一步证据。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023 May;130(5):617-621.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.01.024. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
5
Type 2 inflammation in asthma and other airway diseases.哮喘及其他气道疾病中的2型炎症
ERJ Open Res. 2022 Aug 1;8(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00576-2021. eCollection 2022 Jul.
6
Definition and Nomenclature of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Time for Its Revision.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的定义与命名:是时候修订了。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Dec 1;206(11):1317-1325. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202204-0671PP.
7
Blood Eosinophils and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Science Committee 2022 Review.血液嗜酸性粒细胞与慢性阻塞性肺疾病:慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议科学委员会2022年综述
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Jul 1;206(1):17-24. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202201-0209PP.
8
Influence of disease severity, smoking status and therapy regimes on leukocyte subsets and their ratios in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.疾病严重程度、吸烟状况和治疗方案对稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者白细胞亚群及其比例的影响
Arch Med Sci. 2020 Nov 15;18(3):672-681. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.100720. eCollection 2022.
9
Pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: understanding the contributions of gene-environment interactions across the lifespan.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的发病机制:了解基因-环境相互作用在整个生命周期中的贡献。
Lancet Respir Med. 2022 May;10(5):512-524. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00555-5. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
10
Global, regional, and national prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in 2019: a systematic review and modelling analysis.全球、区域和国家 2019 年慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的患病率、危险因素:系统评价和建模分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2022 May;10(5):447-458. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00511-7. Epub 2022 Mar 10.