Wright Sam, McAree Holly, Hosey Megan, Tantam Kate, Connolly Bronwen
Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Intensive Care Soc. 2024 Dec 6;26(1):68-79. doi: 10.1177/17511437241301000. eCollection 2025 Feb.
Animal-assisted interventions (AAI) can provide psychological support to critical care patients during their intensive care unit (ICU) admission. However, there are currently no data on AAI services across UK ICUs. The current study therefore aims to (i) determine how many ICUs in the UK offer services, (ii) characterise available services and (iii) explore and review local documentation for service oversight.
A service evaluation comprising two parts; a national survey of UK ICU's, analysed using descriptive statistics, and review of local service oversight documents, analysed using a framework approach.
Responses from 74 sites (/242, 30.6%) were included in survey analysis. AAI services were present at 32 sites (/74, 43.2%), of which 30 offered animal-assisted activity services alone and 2 offered both animal-assisted activity and animal-assisted therapy services. Animal-assisted activity services were typically delivered on a weekly basis, lasting 30-60 min and with dogs the sole animal employed. Concern over infection prevention and control was the most common barrier to service provision, as well as a lack of supporting evidence. Sixteen sites provided 27 oversight documents for analysis, that highlighted unique and shared responsibilities between critical care staff and animal therapy handlers, including aspects of administration, welfare and infection control.
From a small sample, AAI services were available in less than half of ICUs. Empirical value of interventions is countered by current lack of definitive evidence of effectiveness, which should be addressed before wider implementation of AAI services and the associated resource requirements, is undertaken.
动物辅助干预(AAI)可为重症监护病房(ICU)的重症患者提供心理支持。然而,目前尚无关于英国各ICU动物辅助干预服务的数据。因此,本研究旨在:(i)确定英国有多少家ICU提供此类服务;(ii)描述现有服务的特点;(iii)探索并审查当地服务监督文件。
一项分为两部分的服务评估:对英国ICU进行全国性调查,采用描述性统计方法进行分析;审查当地服务监督文件,采用框架法进行分析。
调查分析纳入了74家机构的回复(/242,30.6%)。32家机构(/74,43.2%)提供了动物辅助干预服务,其中30家仅提供动物辅助活动服务,2家同时提供动物辅助活动和动物辅助治疗服务。动物辅助活动服务通常每周开展一次,时长30 - 60分钟,仅使用狗作为动物。对感染预防和控制的担忧以及缺乏支持证据是提供服务最常见的障碍。16家机构提供了27份监督文件以供分析,这些文件强调了重症护理人员与动物治疗人员之间独特且共同的责任,包括管理、福利和感染控制等方面。
基于一个小样本,不到半数的ICU提供动物辅助干预服务。当前缺乏干预有效性的确切证据,这抵消了干预的实证价值,在更广泛地实施动物辅助干预服务及其相关资源需求之前,应解决这一问题。