Liu Olivia, Grieb Suzanne M, Halsey Jordan N, Levine Rachel B, Oliva-Hemker Maria, Lee Jennifer K
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (JHUSOM), Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, JHUSOM, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Healthc Leadersh. 2024 Dec 2;16:511-523. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S499001. eCollection 2024.
Gender inequity persists in high-level leadership within academic medicine. Understanding the perspectives of early career women faculty could clarify how to recruit and support women who pursue high-level leadership. This study explored the specific priorities and concerns that may influence the recruitment of women leaders in the future.
Twenty-five assistant professors (mean: 1.8 years at rank) completed the Early Career Women's Leadership Program and participated in semi-structured, in-depth interviews in 2023. Data were analyzed using an iterative, thematic constant comparison process informed by constructivist grounded theory.
The authors identified four themes. In theme one, participants described the , with consideration of their personal and professional lives. They sought mentorship and leadership positions that supported their work-life integration. In theme two, when considering themselves as future leaders. From the individual perspective, participants prioritized personal values like humility and compassion when discussing preferred leadership styles. From the collective perspective, they prioritized inclusivity and teamwork. Theme three showed with a desire to fully understand a leadership position and its impact on personal and professional life. Participants wondered about having the authority and resources to realistically make meaningful change and whether they could adequately prepare to lead. The fourth theme was . Participants valued having women leaders who have experienced similar challenges as themselves. These leaders inspired participants to believe that they could also achieve and succeed in high-level leadership.
Early career women balanced numerous factors when considering whether to pursue high-level leadership in academic medicine. Understanding women's priorities and concerns can enable institutions to prepare women faculty to lead and ultimately recruit and retain them in high-level leadership.
学术医学领域的高层领导中性别不平等现象依然存在。了解早期职业女性教员的观点有助于明确如何招募和支持追求高层领导职位的女性。本研究探讨了可能影响未来女性领导者招募的具体优先事项和担忧。
25名助理教授(平均任职1.8年)完成了早期职业女性领导力项目,并于2023年参与了半结构化的深入访谈。采用基于建构主义扎根理论的迭代式主题持续比较过程对数据进行分析。
作者确定了四个主题。在主题一中,参与者描述了在兼顾个人和职业生活的情况下,她们对指导和领导职位的需求。她们寻求支持工作与生活平衡的指导和领导职位。在主题二中,参与者在将自己视为未来领导者时表达了各种观点。从个人角度来看,参与者在讨论偏好的领导风格时将谦逊和同情心等个人价值观列为优先考虑因素。从集体角度来看,她们将包容性和团队合作列为优先考虑因素。主题三表明,参与者渴望充分了解领导职位及其对个人和职业生活的影响。参与者质疑是否拥有切实做出有意义变革的权力和资源,以及自己是否能够充分做好领导准备。第四个主题是榜样的重要性。参与者重视有与自己经历过类似挑战的女性领导者。这些领导者激励参与者相信自己也能够在高层领导岗位上取得成就并获得成功。
早期职业女性在考虑是否追求学术医学领域的高层领导职位时会权衡诸多因素。了解女性的优先事项和担忧能够使机构帮助女性教员做好领导准备,并最终招募和留住她们担任高层领导职务。