Suppr超能文献

甲氧氯普胺与氟哌啶醇预防性使用对癌症患者吗啡所致恶心和呕吐的疗效及安全性比较:一项对比、随机、前瞻性研究

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Prophylactic Use of Metoclopramide and Haloperidol on Morphine-induced Nausea and Vomiting in Cancer Patients: A Comparative, Randomised, Prospective Study.

作者信息

Singhal Yogendra, Pingoliya Surendra Kumar, Saji Sreeharsh, Gaurav R Pavan

机构信息

Department of Palliative Medicine, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

Indian J Palliat Care. 2024 Oct-Dec;30(4):375-379. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_141_2024. Epub 2024 Oct 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Morphine is the cornerstone of pain management in a palliative care setting. Nausea with or without vomiting usually occurs when patients are initiated on morphine for the 1 time or when the dose is substantially increased.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 90 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated into two groups of 45 each. Group M received a tablet of metoclopramide 10 mg orally 3 times a day; Group H received a tablet of haloperidol (2.5 mg) orally at night. All the patients were provided NCI CTCAE V4.3 NAUSEA AND VOMITING SCALE and asked to mark their response from day 1 to day 7. At the follow-up visit on the 7 day, the form was collected, and data were analysed.

RESULTS

In Group M and Group H, the mean nausea score was between 1 and 2 and the difference was statistically insignificant. In Group M, the maximum vomiting score was 1.28 on day 5, while in Group H, the maximum score was 2 on day 5. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Metoclopramide and haloperidol are equally efficacious in preventing nausea, but metoclopramide was found to be more effective with lesser side effects than haloperidol for morphine-induced vomiting in cancer patients when used prophylactically.

摘要

目的

吗啡是姑息治疗中疼痛管理的基石。患者首次使用吗啡或大幅增加剂量时,通常会出现伴有或不伴有呕吐的恶心症状。

材料与方法

共有90例符合纳入标准的患者被随机分为两组,每组45例。M组患者每天口服3次10毫克胃复安片;H组患者每晚口服1片(2.5毫克)氟哌啶醇。所有患者均获得美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)CTCAE V4.3版恶心与呕吐量表,并要求他们从第1天至第7天记录自己的反应。在第7天的随访中,收集表格并分析数据。

结果

M组和H组的平均恶心评分为1至2分,差异无统计学意义。M组在第5天的最大呕吐评分为1.28分,而H组在第5天的最大评分为2分。两组之间的差异具有统计学意义。

结论

胃复安和氟哌啶醇在预防恶心方面同样有效,但预防性使用时,在预防癌症患者吗啡引起的呕吐方面,胃复安比氟哌啶醇更有效,且副作用更小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验