• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏再同步治疗除颤器延长电池寿命带来的成本节约。

Cost savings associated with extended battery longevity in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators.

作者信息

Williams Jeffrey L, Sato Ryoko, Jacobsen Caroline M

机构信息

James A. Haley Veterans Affairs, Tampa, FL.

Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Sep 20;5(11):755-761. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.09.008. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.1016/j.hroo.2024.09.008
PMID:39651436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11624373/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators (CRT-D) are devices established as treatment for symptomatic heart failure patients at risk of sudden cardiac death. Battery depletion poses a significant clinical and economic burden; extended service life may reduce costs because of generator changes and associated complications.

OBJECTIVE

This study estimated cost-savings associated with extended battery longevity in Medicare patients receiving CRT-D implantation.

METHODS

A decision tree was used to explore 3 battery capacities: 1.0 ampere-hours (Ah), 1.6Ah, and 2.1Ah. Yearly risk of all-cause mortality, device-related complications, and end of battery life were estimated. Over 6 years, estimated costs included device implantation, replacement, follow-up appointments, and complications.

RESULTS

The average total costs to Medicare over 6 years were $41,527, $48,515, and $56,647 per person (USD 2023) for the 2.1 Ah, 1.6 Ah, and 1.0 Ah, respectively. The total per-person replacement cost for the 1.0-Ah devices was more than 4 times that of the 2.1-Ah devices ($20,126 vs $5,006). When extrapolated to the total number of CRT-D implants over a 6-year period, the difference in costs between 2.1-Ah and 1.0-Ah battery capacity exceeded $500 million.

CONCLUSION

Extended longevity CRT-D batteries demonstrate significant cost savings to Medicare over 6 years. These data indicate long-term economic considerations should be included in device selection.

摘要

背景

心脏再同步化治疗除颤器(CRT-D)是用于治疗有心脏性猝死风险的症状性心力衰竭患者的设备。电池耗尽带来了重大的临床和经济负担;延长使用寿命可能因发生器更换及相关并发症而降低成本。

目的

本研究估计了接受CRT-D植入的医疗保险患者中,延长电池寿命所带来的成本节省。

方法

使用决策树来探讨3种电池容量:1.0安培小时(Ah)、1.6Ah和2.1Ah。估计全因死亡率、与设备相关的并发症以及电池寿命结束的年度风险。在6年期间,估计成本包括设备植入、更换、随访预约和并发症。

结果

对于2.1Ah、1.6Ah和1.0Ah的电池,医疗保险在6年期间的人均总成本分别为41,527美元、48,515美元和56,647美元(2023年美元)。1.0Ah设备的人均更换成本是2.1Ah设备的4倍多(20,126美元对5,006美元)。当推算到6年期间CRT-D植入的总数时,2.1Ah和1.0Ah电池容量之间的成本差异超过5亿美元。

结论

延长寿命的CRT-D电池在6年期间为医疗保险节省了大量成本。这些数据表明,在设备选择中应考虑长期经济因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aae1/11624373/772bea2eaeb9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aae1/11624373/f65eb9fb3766/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aae1/11624373/772bea2eaeb9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aae1/11624373/f65eb9fb3766/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aae1/11624373/772bea2eaeb9/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost savings associated with extended battery longevity in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators.心脏再同步治疗除颤器延长电池寿命带来的成本节约。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Sep 20;5(11):755-761. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.09.008. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Ampere Hour as a Predictor of Cardiac Resynchronization Defibrillator Pulse Generator Battery Longevity: A Multicenter Study.安培小时作为心脏再同步除颤器脉冲发生器电池寿命的预测指标:一项多中心研究。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Jul;39(7):658-68. doi: 10.1111/pace.12831. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
3
Economic impact of longer battery life of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in Sweden.心脏再同步治疗除颤器电池寿命延长对瑞典的经济影响。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Oct 31;8:657-666. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S114921. eCollection 2016.
4
Impact of extending device longevity on the long-term costs of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: a modelling study with a 15-year time horizon.延长器械寿命对植入式心脏转复除颤器治疗长期成本的影响:具有 15 年时间范围的建模研究。
Europace. 2013 Oct;15(10):1453-62. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut133. Epub 2013 May 21.
5
First Demonstration of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator Service Life Exceeding Patient Survival in a Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Cohort.首次证明在射血分数降低的心力衰竭队列中,心脏再同步治疗除颤器的使用寿命超过患者生存期。
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2020 Dec 15;11(12):4325-4332. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2020.111203. eCollection 2020 Dec.
6
Longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for cardiac resynchronization therapy in current clinical practice: an analysis according to influencing factors, device generation, and manufacturer.当前临床实践中用于心脏再同步治疗的植入式心脏复律除颤器的使用寿命:根据影响因素、设备代次和制造商进行的分析
Europace. 2015 Aug;17(8):1251-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv109. Epub 2015 May 14.
7
Effect of battery longevity on costs and health outcomes associated with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a Markov model-based Monte Carlo simulation.电池寿命对心脏植入式电子设备相关成本和健康结果的影响:基于马尔可夫模型的蒙特卡罗模拟
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017 Nov;50(2):149-158. doi: 10.1007/s10840-017-0289-8. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
8
The economic impact of battery longevity in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for cardiac resynchronization therapy: the hospital and healthcare system perspectives.植入式心脏再同步治疗除颤器中电池寿命的经济影响:医院和医疗保健系统的观点。
Europace. 2017 Aug 1;19(8):1349-1356. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw176.
9
Battery longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: technical, clinical and economic aspects. An expert review paper from EHRA.植入式心脏复律除颤器和心脏再同步治疗除颤器的电池寿命:技术、临床和经济方面。EHRA 的专家评论文章。
Europace. 2018 Dec 1;20(12):1882-1897. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy066.
10
Battery drain in daily practice and medium-term projections on longevity of cardioverter-defibrillators: an analysis from a remote monitoring database.日常实践中的电池消耗及心脏复律除颤器寿命的中期预测:来自远程监测数据库的分析
Europace. 2016 Sep;18(9):1366-73. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv436. Epub 2016 Feb 3.

本文引用的文献

1
The Safety of Inpatient Health Care.住院患者医疗安全。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jan 12;388(2):142-153. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2206117.
2
2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/美国心力衰竭学会心力衰竭管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2022 May 3;145(18):e895-e1032. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
3
First Demonstration of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator Service Life Exceeding Patient Survival in a Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Cohort.
首次证明在射血分数降低的心力衰竭队列中,心脏再同步治疗除颤器的使用寿命超过患者生存期。
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2020 Dec 15;11(12):4325-4332. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2020.111203. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
Trends of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infection in 3 Decades: A Population-Based Study.三十年来心血管植入式电子设备感染的趋势:一项基于人群的研究。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Sep;5(9):1071-1080. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.06.016. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
5
Effect of battery longevity on costs and health outcomes associated with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a Markov model-based Monte Carlo simulation.电池寿命对心脏植入式电子设备相关成本和健康结果的影响:基于马尔可夫模型的蒙特卡罗模拟
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017 Nov;50(2):149-158. doi: 10.1007/s10840-017-0289-8. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
6
Economic impact of longer battery life of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in Sweden.心脏再同步治疗除颤器电池寿命延长对瑞典的经济影响。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Oct 31;8:657-666. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S114921. eCollection 2016.
7
The economic impact of battery longevity in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for cardiac resynchronization therapy: the hospital and healthcare system perspectives.植入式心脏再同步治疗除颤器中电池寿命的经济影响:医院和医疗保健系统的观点。
Europace. 2017 Aug 1;19(8):1349-1356. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw176.
8
Battery longevity from cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: differences between manufacturers and discrepancies with published product performance reports.心脏再同步治疗除颤器的电池寿命:制造商之间的差异以及与已发表的产品性能报告的不符之处。
Europace. 2017 Mar 1;19(3):421-424. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw044.
9
The mismatch between patient life expectancy and the service life of implantable devices in current cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: a call for larger device batteries.当前心脏除颤器治疗中患者预期寿命与植入设备寿命不匹配:呼吁使用更大容量的设备电池。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Jun;104(6):456-60. doi: 10.1007/s00392-014-0807-y. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
10
Rates of and factors associated with infection in 200 909 Medicare implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implants: results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.200909 例 Medicare 植入式心脏复律除颤器植入患者的感染率和相关因素:来自国家心血管数据注册中心的结果。
Circulation. 2014 Sep 23;130(13):1037-43. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009081. Epub 2014 Jul 31.