• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首次证明在射血分数降低的心力衰竭队列中,心脏再同步治疗除颤器的使用寿命超过患者生存期。

First Demonstration of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator Service Life Exceeding Patient Survival in a Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Cohort.

作者信息

Williams Jeffrey L, Harley Bertha, Williams Gabriella

机构信息

Lakeland Regional Health System, Lakeland, FL, USA.

University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2020 Dec 15;11(12):4325-4332. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2020.111203. eCollection 2020 Dec.

DOI:10.19102/icrm.2020.111203
PMID:33408952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7769506/
Abstract

The occurrence of patient longevity exceeding implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) service life has important implications for patient outcomes and the cost of care. Battery capacity as measured in ampere-hours (Ah) is a strong predictor of survival to an elective replacement indicator (ERI) point and 2.1 Ah is the largest-capacity ICD battery in use at our facility. This was a long-term study of ICDs out of service (OOS) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who received a 2.1-Ah cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D). All 2.1-Ah CRT-D systems implanted (n = 418) from August 1, 2008 through August 31, 2016 were included in this retrospective chart review. The primary endpoint was device OOS due to the battery reaching an ERI point, patient death, infection/erosion, advisory/recall, heart transplant, or unspecified. The maximum follow-up period was 10.3 years, with a mean follow-up length of 4.7 years. The most common reason for device OOS was patient death (65.6%), with only 5.7% of devices reaching the ERI point during the study. There was a period of OOS acceleration driven numerically by patient death in the sixth to ninth years of follow-up. Male sex, ischemic cardiomyopathy, elevated creatinine level, advanced age, and reduced ejection fraction were associated with OOS (p < 0.05). To our knowledge, this is the first study to report ICD battery life exceeding patient survival in a chronic heart failure cohort. During an accelerated time of CRT-D OOS (when it is expected that ~98% of 1.0-Ah and 1.4-Ah CRT-D systems reach an ERI point), patient death resulted in substantially more device OOS than battery replacement and avoided costs of complications and generator changes. These results help to explain the elevated risks of CRT-D generator changes in shorter-longevity devices.

摘要

患者寿命超过植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)使用寿命这一情况,对患者的治疗结果及护理成本具有重要影响。以安培小时(Ah)衡量的电池容量,是预测达到择期更换指标(ERI)时间的有力指标,且2.1 Ah是我们机构目前使用的最大容量ICD电池。这是一项针对射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者中已停用(OOS)的ICD进行的长期研究,这些患者接受了2.1 Ah的心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)。2008年8月1日至2016年8月31日期间植入的所有2.1 Ah CRT-D系统(n = 418)均纳入了此次回顾性病历审查。主要终点是由于电池达到ERI点、患者死亡、感染/侵蚀、咨询/召回、心脏移植或未明确原因导致的设备停用。最长随访期为10.3年,平均随访时长为4.7年。设备停用的最常见原因是患者死亡(65.6%),在研究期间只有5.7%的设备达到ERI点。在随访的第六至第九年,受患者死亡数字驱动,出现了一段设备停用加速期。男性、缺血性心肌病、肌酐水平升高、高龄和射血分数降低与设备停用相关(p < 0.05)。据我们所知,这是第一项报告慢性心力衰竭队列中ICD电池寿命超过患者生存期的研究。在CRT-D停用加速期(预计1.0 Ah和1.4 Ah的CRT-D系统约98%会达到ERI点),患者死亡导致的设备停用比电池更换多得多,且避免了并发症和发生器更换的成本。这些结果有助于解释寿命较短的设备中CRT-D发生器更换风险较高的原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0362/7769506/aa8229b2123d/icrm-11-4325-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0362/7769506/8672da391a2c/icrm-11-4325-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0362/7769506/aa8229b2123d/icrm-11-4325-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0362/7769506/8672da391a2c/icrm-11-4325-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0362/7769506/aa8229b2123d/icrm-11-4325-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
First Demonstration of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator Service Life Exceeding Patient Survival in a Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Cohort.首次证明在射血分数降低的心力衰竭队列中,心脏再同步治疗除颤器的使用寿命超过患者生存期。
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2020 Dec 15;11(12):4325-4332. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2020.111203. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Ampere Hour as a Predictor of Cardiac Resynchronization Defibrillator Pulse Generator Battery Longevity: A Multicenter Study.安培小时作为心脏再同步除颤器脉冲发生器电池寿命的预测指标:一项多中心研究。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Jul;39(7):658-68. doi: 10.1111/pace.12831. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
3
Battery longevity in cardiac resynchronization therapy implantable cardioverter defibrillators.心脏再同步治疗除颤器的电池寿命。
Europace. 2014 Feb;16(2):246-51. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut301. Epub 2013 Oct 6.
4
Impact of extending device longevity on the long-term costs of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: a modelling study with a 15-year time horizon.延长器械寿命对植入式心脏转复除颤器治疗长期成本的影响:具有 15 年时间范围的建模研究。
Europace. 2013 Oct;15(10):1453-62. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut133. Epub 2013 May 21.
5
"Real life" longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator devices.植入式心脏复律除颤器设备的“实际使用寿命”
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Sep;40(9):759-764. doi: 10.1002/clc.22729. Epub 2017 May 22.
6
Battery drain in daily practice and medium-term projections on longevity of cardioverter-defibrillators: an analysis from a remote monitoring database.日常实践中的电池消耗及心脏复律除颤器寿命的中期预测:来自远程监测数据库的分析
Europace. 2016 Sep;18(9):1366-73. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv436. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
7
Longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for cardiac resynchronization therapy in current clinical practice: an analysis according to influencing factors, device generation, and manufacturer.当前临床实践中用于心脏再同步治疗的植入式心脏复律除颤器的使用寿命:根据影响因素、设备代次和制造商进行的分析
Europace. 2015 Aug;17(8):1251-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv109. Epub 2015 May 14.
8
Significant Discrepancy Between Estimated and Actual Longevity in St. Jude Medical Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators.圣犹达医疗公司植入式心律转复除颤器的预计寿命与实际寿命之间存在显著差异。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 May;28(5):552-558. doi: 10.1111/jce.13178. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
9
Appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions in cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) patients undergoing device replacement: time to downgrade from CRT-D to CRT-pacemaker? Insights from real-world clinical practice in the DECODE CRT-D analysis.心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)患者更换器械时的适当植入式心律转复除颤器干预:是否需要从 CRT-D 降级为 CRT-起搏器?DECODE CRT-D 分析中的真实临床实践见解。
Europace. 2018 Sep 1;20(9):1475-1483. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux323.
10
Device Longevity in a Contemporary Cohort of ICD/CRT-D Patients Undergoing Device Replacement.当代接受设备更换的植入式心脏复律除颤器/心脏再同步化治疗除颤器(ICD/CRT-D)患者队列中的设备使用寿命
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Jul;27(7):840-5. doi: 10.1111/jce.12990. Epub 2016 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Battery Longevity in Modern Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillators.现代植入式心脏复律除颤器和心脏再同步治疗除颤器的电池寿命
J Arrhythm. 2025 Aug 15;41(4):e70175. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70175. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Cost savings associated with extended battery longevity in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators.心脏再同步治疗除颤器延长电池寿命带来的成本节约。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Sep 20;5(11):755-761. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.09.008. eCollection 2024 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Noncardiac Versus Cardiac Mortality in Heart Failure With Preserved, Midrange, and Reduced Ejection Fraction.射血分数保留、中间范围和降低的心衰患者的非心脏性与心脏性死亡率。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Oct 15;8(20):e013441. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013441. Epub 2019 Oct 5.
2
Survival of patients with chronic heart failure in the community: a systematic review and meta-analysis.社区慢性心力衰竭患者的生存状况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Nov;21(11):1306-1325. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1594. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
3
Favorable Trend of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Service Life in a Large Single-Nation Population: Insights From 10-Year Analysis of the Italian Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry.
大型单一国家人群中植入式心脏复律除颤器使用寿命的有利趋势:来自意大利植入式心脏复律除颤器注册十年分析的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Aug 6;8(15):e012759. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012759. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
4
Longevity decoded: Insights from power consumption analyses into device construction and their clinical implications.长寿解码:功耗分析对设备构造的见解及其临床意义。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Apr;42(4):407-422. doi: 10.1111/pace.13642. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
5
Trends in survival after a diagnosis of heart failure in the United Kingdom 2000-2017: population based cohort study.2000-2017 年英国心力衰竭诊断后生存率趋势:基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2019 Feb 13;364:l223. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l223.
6
Predicted longevity of contemporary cardiac implantable electronic devices: A call for industry-wide "standardized" reporting.预测当代心脏植入式电子设备的预期寿命:呼吁全行业“标准化”报告。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Dec;15(12):1756-1763. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.07.029. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
7
Battery longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: technical, clinical and economic aspects. An expert review paper from EHRA.植入式心脏复律除颤器和心脏再同步治疗除颤器的电池寿命:技术、临床和经济方面。EHRA 的专家评论文章。
Europace. 2018 Dec 1;20(12):1882-1897. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy066.
8
Heart Failure With Preserved, Borderline, and Reduced Ejection Fraction: 5-Year Outcomes.心力衰竭伴射血分数保留、轻度降低和中度降低:5 年结局。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Nov 14;70(20):2476-2486. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.08.074. Epub 2017 Nov 12.
9
"Real life" longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator devices.植入式心脏复律除颤器设备的“实际使用寿命”
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Sep;40(9):759-764. doi: 10.1002/clc.22729. Epub 2017 May 22.
10
Economic impact of longer battery life of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in Sweden.心脏再同步治疗除颤器电池寿命延长对瑞典的经济影响。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Oct 31;8:657-666. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S114921. eCollection 2016.