• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于卫星的农田土壤有机碳变化时空监测

Spatiotemporal Monitoring of Cropland Soil Organic Carbon Changes From Space.

作者信息

Broeg Tom, Don Axel, Wiesmeier Martin, Scholten Thomas, Erasmi Stefan

机构信息

Thünen Earth Observation (ThEO), Thünen Institute of Farm Economics, Braunschweig, Germany.

Department of Geosciences, Soil Science and Geomorphology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Dec;30(12):e17608. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17608.

DOI:10.1111/gcb.17608
PMID:39651630
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11626691/
Abstract

Soil monitoring requires accurate and spatially explicit information on soil organic carbon (SOC) trends and changes over time. Spatiotemporal SOC models based on Earth Observation (EO) satellite data can support large-scale SOC monitoring but often lack sufficient temporal validation based on long-term soil data. In this study, we used repeated SOC samples from 1986 to 2022 and a time series of multispectral bare soil observations (Landsat and Sentinel-2) to model high-resolution cropland SOC trends for almost four decades. An in-depth validation of the temporal model uncertainty and accuracy of the derived SOC trends was conducted based on a network of 100 long-term monitoring sites that were continuously resampled every 5 years. While the general SOC prediction accuracy was high (R = 0.61; RMSE = 5.6 g kg), the direct validation of the derived SOC trends revealed a significantly greater uncertainty (R = 0.16; p < 0.0001), even though predicted and measured values showed similar distributions. Classifying the results into declining and increasing SOC trends, we found that 95% of all sites were either correctly identified or predicted as stable (p < 0.001), highlighting the potential of our findings. Increased accuracies for SOC trends were found in soils with higher SOC contents (R = 0.4) and sites with reduced tillage (R = 0.26). Based on the signal-to-noise ratio and temporal model uncertainty, we were able to show that the necessary time frame to detect SOC trends strongly depends on the absolute SOC changes present in the soils. Our findings highlight the potential to generate significant cropland SOC trend maps based on EO data and underline the necessity for direct validation with repeated soil samples and long-term SOC measurements. This study marks an important step toward the usability and integration of EO-based SOC maps for large-scale soil carbon monitoring.

摘要

土壤监测需要有关土壤有机碳(SOC)随时间变化的趋势和变化的准确且具有空间明确性的信息。基于地球观测(EO)卫星数据的时空SOC模型可以支持大规模的SOC监测,但往往缺乏基于长期土壤数据的充分时间验证。在本研究中,我们使用了1986年至2022年的重复SOC样本以及多光谱裸土观测的时间序列(陆地卫星和哨兵 - 2)来模拟近四十年来高分辨率农田SOC趋势。基于一个每5年持续重新采样的100个长期监测站点网络,对导出的SOC趋势的时间模型不确定性和准确性进行了深入验证。虽然一般SOC预测精度较高(R = 0.61;RMSE = 5.6 g/kg),但对导出的SOC趋势的直接验证显示出显著更大的不确定性(R = 0.16;p < 0.0001),尽管预测值和测量值显示出相似的分布。将结果分为SOC下降和上升趋势,我们发现所有站点中有95%被正确识别或预测为稳定(p < 0.001),突出了我们研究结果的潜力。在SOC含量较高的土壤(R = 0.4)和少耕的站点(R = 0.26)中发现了更高的SOC趋势精度。基于信噪比和时间模型不确定性,我们能够表明检测SOC趋势所需的时间框架强烈取决于土壤中存在的绝对SOC变化。我们的研究结果突出了基于EO数据生成重要农田SOC趋势图的潜力,并强调了用重复土壤样本和长期SOC测量进行直接验证的必要性。这项研究标志着朝着基于EO的SOC地图在大规模土壤碳监测中的可用性和整合迈出了重要一步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/1f5afb9e0c67/GCB-30-e17608-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/866611b5595b/GCB-30-e17608-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/40dcdecfbc96/GCB-30-e17608-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/eeebb462e52d/GCB-30-e17608-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/9ceb6f4b8d66/GCB-30-e17608-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/822b88c059b7/GCB-30-e17608-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/2351a18ecf71/GCB-30-e17608-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/7cf5eff04d3e/GCB-30-e17608-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/38755e09915d/GCB-30-e17608-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/e1e07ea89ec2/GCB-30-e17608-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/e30e6437d434/GCB-30-e17608-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/1f5afb9e0c67/GCB-30-e17608-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/866611b5595b/GCB-30-e17608-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/40dcdecfbc96/GCB-30-e17608-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/eeebb462e52d/GCB-30-e17608-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/9ceb6f4b8d66/GCB-30-e17608-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/822b88c059b7/GCB-30-e17608-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/2351a18ecf71/GCB-30-e17608-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/7cf5eff04d3e/GCB-30-e17608-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/38755e09915d/GCB-30-e17608-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/e1e07ea89ec2/GCB-30-e17608-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/e30e6437d434/GCB-30-e17608-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d500/11626691/1f5afb9e0c67/GCB-30-e17608-g012.jpg

相似文献

1
Spatiotemporal Monitoring of Cropland Soil Organic Carbon Changes From Space.基于卫星的农田土壤有机碳变化时空监测
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Dec;30(12):e17608. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17608.
2
Twenty-five years of observations of soil organic carbon in Swiss croplands showing stability overall but with some divergent trends.瑞士农田土壤有机碳观测 25 年:整体稳定,但部分趋势出现差异。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Apr 13;191(5):277. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7435-y.
3
Agricultural management explains historic changes in regional soil carbon stocks.农业管理解释了区域土壤碳储量的历史变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 17;107(33):14926-30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002592107. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
4
Incorporating agricultural practices in digital mapping improves prediction of cropland soil organic carbon content: The case of the Tuojiang River Basin.将农业实践纳入数字制图可提高农田土壤有机碳含量的预测:以沱江流域为例。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Mar 15;330:117203. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117203. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
5
Differential contribution of microbial and plant-derived organic matter to soil organic carbon sequestration over two decades of natural revegetation and cropping.微生物和植物源有机质对自然植被恢复和耕种二十年土壤有机碳固存的差异贡献。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Nov 1;949:174960. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174960. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
6
Employment of GIS techniques to assess the long-term impact of tillage on the soil organic carbon of agricultural fields under hyper-arid conditions.运用 GIS 技术评估在超干旱条件下耕作对农田土壤有机碳的长期影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 19;14(2):e0212521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212521. eCollection 2019.
7
Impacts of agricultural management and climate change on future soil organic carbon dynamics in North China Plain.农业管理与气候变化对华北平原未来土壤有机碳动态的影响
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 10;9(4):e94827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094827. eCollection 2014.
8
Interactive impacts of climate change and agricultural management on soil organic carbon sequestration potential of cropland in China over the coming decades.未来几十年气候变化和农业管理对中国耕地土壤有机碳固存潜力的交互影响
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Apr 15;817:153018. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153018. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
9
The AMG model coupled with Rock-Eval® analysis accurately predicts cropland soil organic carbon dynamics in the Tuojiang River Basin, Southwest China.AMG 模型与 Rock-Eval®分析相结合,可准确预测中国西南地区沱江流域农田土壤有机碳动态。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Nov 1;345:118850. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118850. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
10
Divergent responses of cropland soil organic carbon to warming across the Sichuan Basin of China.中国四川盆地农田土壤有机碳对变暖的差异响应。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Dec 10;851(Pt 2):158323. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158323. Epub 2022 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatiotemporal prediction of soil organic carbon density in Europe (2000-2022) using earth observation and machine learning.利用地球观测和机器学习对欧洲2000 - 2022年土壤有机碳密度进行时空预测
PeerJ. 2025 Jul 14;13:e19605. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19605. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Carbon sequestration in soils and climate change mitigation-Definitions and pitfalls.土壤碳固存与减缓气候变化——定义与误区。
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Jan;30(1):e16983. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16983. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
2
Soil organic carbon stocks in European croplands and grasslands: How much have we lost in the past decade?欧洲农田和草地的土壤有机碳储量:在过去十年中我们损失了多少?
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Jan;30(1):e16992. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16992. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
3
Carbon farming: Are soil carbon certificates a suitable tool for climate change mitigation?
碳农业:土壤碳证书是缓解气候变化的合适工具吗?
J Environ Manage. 2023 Mar 15;330:117142. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117142. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
4
Multiple soil map comparison highlights challenges for predicting topsoil organic carbon concentration at national scale.多份土壤图对比凸显了在国家尺度预测表土有机碳浓度面临的挑战。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 26;12(1):1379. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05476-5.
5
Soil organic carbon changes in landscape units of Belgium between 1960 and 2000 with reference to 1990.1960年至2000年期间比利时景观单元土壤有机碳的变化,并以1990年为参照。
Glob Chang Biol. 2005 Dec;11(12):2128-2140. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001074.x.
6
Mapping soil organic carbon stocks and trends with satellite-driven high resolution maps over South Africa.利用卫星驱动的高分辨率地图绘制南非土壤有机碳储量及其变化趋势图。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 1;771:145384. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145384. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
7
Towards a global-scale soil climate mitigation strategy.迈向全球性土壤气候缓解策略。
Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 27;11(1):5427. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18887-7.
8
The concept and future prospects of soil health.土壤健康的概念与未来展望。
Nat Rev Earth Environ. 2020 Oct;1(10):544-553. doi: 10.1038/s43017-020-0080-8. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
9
Tracking changes in soil organic carbon across the heterogeneous agricultural landscape of the Lower Fraser Valley of British Columbia.追踪不列颠哥伦比亚省低福尔斯谷农业景观异质性下土壤有机碳的变化。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 25;732:138994. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138994. Epub 2020 May 5.
10
How to measure, report and verify soil carbon change to realize the potential of soil carbon sequestration for atmospheric greenhouse gas removal.如何衡量、报告和核实土壤碳变化,以实现土壤碳固存作为大气温室气体清除的潜力。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Jan;26(1):219-241. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14815. Epub 2019 Oct 6.