• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用地球观测和机器学习对欧洲2000 - 2022年土壤有机碳密度进行时空预测

Spatiotemporal prediction of soil organic carbon density in Europe (2000-2022) using earth observation and machine learning.

作者信息

Tian Xuemeng, de Bruin Sytze, Simoes Rolf, Isik Mustafa Serkan, Minarik Robert, Ho Yu-Feng, Şahin Murat, Herold Martin, Consoli Davide, Hengl Tomislav

机构信息

OpenGeoHub, Doorwerth, Netherlands.

Laboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2025 Jul 14;13:e19605. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19605. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.19605
PMID:40677752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12269785/
Abstract

This article describes a comprehensive framework for soil organic carbon density (SOCD, kg/m) modeling and mapping, based on spatiotemporal random forest (RF) and quantile regression forests (QRF). A total of 45,616 SOCD observations and various Earth observation (EO) feature layers were used to produce 30 m SOCD maps for the EU at four-year intervals (2000-2022) and four soil depth intervals (0-20 cm, 20-50 cm, 50-100 cm, and 100-200 cm). Per-pixel 95% probability prediction intervals (PIs) and extrapolation risk probabilities are also provided. Model evaluation indicates good overall accuracy ( = 0.63 and CCC = 0.76 for hold-out independent tests). Prediction accuracy varies by land cover, depth interval and year of prediction with the worst accuracy for shrubland and deeper soils 100-200 cm. The PI validation confirmed effective uncertainty estimation, though with reduced accuracy for higher SOCD values. Shapley analysis identified soil depth as the most influential feature, followed by vegetation, long-term bioclimate, and topographic features. While pixel-level uncertainty is substantial, spatial aggregation reduces uncertainty by approximately 66%. Detecting SOCD changes remains challenging but offers a baseline for future improvements. Maps, based primarily on topsoil data from cropland, grassland, and woodland, are best suited for applications related to these land covers and depths. We recommend that users interpret the maps in conjunction with local knowledge and consider the accompanying uncertainty and extrapolation risk layers. All data and code are available under an open license at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13754343 and https://github.com/AI4SoilHealth/SoilHealthDataCube/.

摘要

本文介绍了一种基于时空随机森林(RF)和分位数回归森林(QRF)的土壤有机碳密度(SOCD,kg/m)建模与制图综合框架。总共使用了45616个SOCD观测值和各种地球观测(EO)特征层,以四年为间隔(2000 - 2022年)和四个土壤深度间隔(0 - 20厘米、20 - 50厘米、50 - 100厘米和100 - 200厘米)生成欧盟的30米SOCD地图。还提供了逐像素的95%概率预测区间(PIs)和外推风险概率。模型评估表明总体精度良好(留一法独立测试中 = 0.63,CCC = 0.76)。预测精度因土地覆盖、深度间隔和预测年份而异,灌丛地和100 - 200厘米的深层土壤精度最差。PI验证证实了有效的不确定性估计,尽管对于较高的SOCD值精度有所降低。Shapley分析确定土壤深度是最具影响力的特征,其次是植被、长期生物气候和地形特征。虽然像素级不确定性很大,但空间聚合可将不确定性降低约66%。检测SOCD变化仍然具有挑战性,但为未来改进提供了基线。主要基于农田、草地和林地表土数据的地图最适合与这些土地覆盖和深度相关的应用。我们建议用户结合当地知识解读地图,并考虑附带的不确定性和外推风险图层。所有数据和代码均可在https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13754343和https://github.com/AI4SoilHealth/SoilHealthDataCube/上以开放许可获取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/476ec149837d/peerj-13-19605-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/92e9dd60f26a/peerj-13-19605-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/8adb79d7a72f/peerj-13-19605-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/bec460cccfb9/peerj-13-19605-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/38d2b07ed1dd/peerj-13-19605-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/72a9f3110f3e/peerj-13-19605-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/8236f5f1fac7/peerj-13-19605-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/14c2f80e1a43/peerj-13-19605-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/5a1ee76a640f/peerj-13-19605-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/b7579a0b22dd/peerj-13-19605-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/20967ea8e357/peerj-13-19605-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/b6f6735ed357/peerj-13-19605-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/814cd7fd8f0b/peerj-13-19605-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/3a8269316a7c/peerj-13-19605-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/a57b04b339a6/peerj-13-19605-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/9cbb7951fd48/peerj-13-19605-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/471ed0845693/peerj-13-19605-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/b4f922eda416/peerj-13-19605-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/476ec149837d/peerj-13-19605-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/92e9dd60f26a/peerj-13-19605-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/8adb79d7a72f/peerj-13-19605-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/bec460cccfb9/peerj-13-19605-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/38d2b07ed1dd/peerj-13-19605-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/72a9f3110f3e/peerj-13-19605-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/8236f5f1fac7/peerj-13-19605-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/14c2f80e1a43/peerj-13-19605-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/5a1ee76a640f/peerj-13-19605-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/b7579a0b22dd/peerj-13-19605-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/20967ea8e357/peerj-13-19605-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/b6f6735ed357/peerj-13-19605-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/814cd7fd8f0b/peerj-13-19605-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/3a8269316a7c/peerj-13-19605-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/a57b04b339a6/peerj-13-19605-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/9cbb7951fd48/peerj-13-19605-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/471ed0845693/peerj-13-19605-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/b4f922eda416/peerj-13-19605-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080b/12269785/476ec149837d/peerj-13-19605-g018.jpg

相似文献

1
Spatiotemporal prediction of soil organic carbon density in Europe (2000-2022) using earth observation and machine learning.利用地球观测和机器学习对欧洲2000 - 2022年土壤有机碳密度进行时空预测
PeerJ. 2025 Jul 14;13:e19605. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19605. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Does the Presence of Missing Data Affect the Performance of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Patients With Spinal Metastasis? Development of an Internet Application Algorithm.缺失数据的存在是否会影响 SORG 机器学习算法在脊柱转移瘤患者中的性能?开发一种互联网应用算法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):143-157. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002706. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
4
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
5
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Stabilizing machine learning for reproducible and explainable results: A novel validation approach to subject-specific insights.稳定机器学习以获得可重复和可解释的结果:一种针对特定个体见解的新型验证方法。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2025 Jun 21;269:108899. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108899.
8
Insights into the comparison of machine learning models on rice grain arsenic prediction: Interplay of rice cultivation systems and soil environmental factors.水稻籽粒砷含量预测中机器学习模型比较的见解:水稻种植系统与土壤环境因素的相互作用
Environ Pollut. 2025 Sep 15;381:126646. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126646. Epub 2025 Jun 10.
9
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
10
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.

本文引用的文献

1
Spatiotemporal Monitoring of Cropland Soil Organic Carbon Changes From Space.基于卫星的农田土壤有机碳变化时空监测
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Dec;30(12):e17608. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17608.
2
A computational framework for processing time-series of earth observation data based on discrete convolution: global-scale historical Landsat cloud-free aggregates at 30 m spatial resolution.一种基于离散卷积处理地球观测数据时间序列的计算框架:30米空间分辨率的全球尺度历史陆地卫星无云聚合数据。
PeerJ. 2024 Dec 4;12:e18585. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18585. eCollection 2024.
3
Land potential assessment and trend-analysis using 2000-2021 FAPAR monthly time-series at 250 m spatial resolution.
利用 2000-2021 年每月 FAPAR 时间序列数据(空间分辨率为 250 米)进行土地潜力评估和趋势分析。
PeerJ. 2024 Mar 13;12:e16972. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16972. eCollection 2024.
4
A global land cover training dataset from 1984 to 2020.一个全球土地覆盖训练数据集,时间跨度为 1984 年至 2020 年。
Sci Data. 2023 Dec 7;10(1):879. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02798-5.
5
Soil organic carbon stocks in European croplands and grasslands: How much have we lost in the past decade?欧洲农田和草地的土壤有机碳储量:在过去十年中我们损失了多少?
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Jan;30(1):e16992. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16992. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
6
Global maps of cropland extent and change show accelerated cropland expansion in the twenty-first century.全球耕地范围和变化图表明,二十一世纪耕地扩张速度加快。
Nat Food. 2022 Jan;3(1):19-28. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00429-z. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
7
Carbon for soils, not soils for carbon.碳存于土壤中,而非土壤存于碳之中。
Glob Chang Biol. 2023 May;29(9):2384-2398. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16570. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
8
Carbon farming: Are soil carbon certificates a suitable tool for climate change mitigation?碳农业:土壤碳证书是缓解气候变化的合适工具吗?
J Environ Manage. 2023 Mar 15;330:117142. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117142. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
9
A loss function to evaluate agricultural decision-making under uncertainty: a case study of soil spectroscopy.一种用于评估不确定性下农业决策的损失函数:以土壤光谱学为例
Precis Agric. 2022;23(4):1333-1353. doi: 10.1007/s11119-022-09887-2. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
10
A global record of annual terrestrial Human Footprint dataset from 2000 to 2018.2000 年至 2018 年全球年度陆地人类足迹数据集
Sci Data. 2022 Apr 19;9(1):176. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01284-8.