Bixio Riccardo, Mastropaolo Francesca, Appoloni Matteo, Bertelle Davide, Bertoldo Eugenia, Morciano Andrea, Di Donato Stefano, Adami Giovanni, Viapiana Ombretta, Rossini Maurizio, Luca Idolazzi
Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, P.le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Azienda Sanitaria Friuli Occidentale, Pordenone, Italy.
Clin Rheumatol. 2025 Jan;44(1):299-304. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-07238-2. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
To assess short-term barnidipine efficacy and tolerability on Systemic Sclerosis (SSc)-Raynaud's phenomenon (RP).
We retrospectively evaluated patients with SSc starting barnidipine 10 mg/day. Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) and mean blood pressure (MBP) were assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Discontinuation rates and adverse events (AEs) were compared with retrospectively evaluated patients who started MR-nifedipine 20 mg/day at our centre.
Sixty-four patients (29 barnidipine, 35 MR-nifedipine) were evaluated. Most patients starting barnidipine had a previous CCB exposure (69%; 57.9% of these were withdrawn for AEs). During follow-up, RCS decreased significantly (6.6 ± 1.8 vs 4.4 ± 1.8, p < 0.001), while the MBP did not change significantly (86.4 ± 8.4 vs 85 ± 7.3 mmHg; p = 0.36). Nine patients (31%) discontinued barnidipine during the follow-up (AEs 6/9, inefficacy 3/9). Previous CCB failure did not predict barnidipine withdrawal (OR = 0.188 95%CI [0.02-1.8]; p = 0.147). No predictors of barnidipine withdrawal were found, and no clinical or demographic differences were found between patients withdrawing and continuing barnidipine. The 6-month retention rates of barnidipine and MR-nifedipine did not differ significantly (69 vs 80%; log-rank p = 0.23), and the two groups had a similar incidence of AEs leading to discontinuation (20.1 vs 17%; p = 0.48).
Barnidipine could be an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option to treat SSc-RP, even in patients previously failing other CCBs. Key Points • Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) currently represent the first-line treatment for Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to Systemic Sclerosis (SSc-RP). However, little data exists about using novel CCBs, such as barnidipine, in this condition. • This study retrospectively evaluated patients with SSc-RP treated with barnidipine to assess its short-term efficacy. To serve as a control group for tolerability, we retrospectively compared these patients with others starting modified release-nifedipine (MR-nifedipine). • In patients treated with barnidipine, we observed a significant decrease in Raynaud's condition score at the 6-month follow-up without substantial changes in mean blood pressure. • The proportion of adverse events and drug withdrawal rate between patients starting barnidipine and MR-nifedipine did not differ significantly, even in patients starting barnidipine after previously failing other CCBs.
评估巴尼地平对系统性硬化症(SSc)雷诺现象(RP)的短期疗效和耐受性。
我们回顾性评估了开始服用巴尼地平10毫克/天的SSc患者。在基线和6个月随访时评估雷诺状况评分(RCS)和平均血压(MBP)。将停药率和不良事件(AE)与在我们中心开始服用20毫克/天控释硝苯地平(MR-硝苯地平)的回顾性评估患者进行比较。
共评估了64例患者(29例服用巴尼地平,35例服用MR-硝苯地平)。大多数开始服用巴尼地平的患者以前曾接触过CCB(69%;其中57.9%因AE停药)。随访期间,RCS显著降低(6.6±1.8对4.4±1.8,p<0.001),而MBP无显著变化(86.4±8.4对85±7.3 mmHg;p=0.36)。9例患者(31%)在随访期间停用巴尼地平(AE 6/9,无效3/9)。既往CCB治疗失败不能预测巴尼地平停药(OR=0.188,95%CI[0.02-1.8];p=0.147)。未发现巴尼地平停药的预测因素,停药和继续服用巴尼地平的患者之间未发现临床或人口统计学差异。巴尼地平和MR-硝苯地平的6个月保留率无显著差异(69%对80%;对数秩检验p=0.23),两组导致停药的AE发生率相似(20.1%对17%;p=0.48)。
巴尼地平可能是治疗SSc-RP的一种有效且耐受性良好的治疗选择,即使是之前使用其他CCB治疗失败的患者。要点 • 钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)目前是系统性硬化症继发雷诺现象(SSc-RP)的一线治疗药物。然而,关于在这种情况下使用新型CCB(如巴尼地平)的数据很少。 • 本研究回顾性评估了接受巴尼地平治疗的SSc-RP患者,以评估其短期疗效。为作为耐受性的对照组,我们将这些患者与开始服用缓释硝苯地平(MR-硝苯地平)的其他患者进行了回顾性比较。 • 在接受巴尼地平治疗的患者中,我们观察到6个月随访时雷诺状况评分显著降低,而平均血压无实质性变化。 • 开始服用巴尼地平和MR-硝苯地平的患者之间的不良事件比例和药物停药率无显著差异,即使是之前使用其他CCB治疗失败后开始服用巴尼地平的患者。