McDonald Scott A, Jan van Hoek Albert, Paolotti Daniela, Hooiveld Mariette, Meijer Adam, de Lange Marit, van Gageldonk-Lafeber Arianne, Wallinga Jacco
Centre for Infectious Disease Control, Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Institute for Scientific Interchange Foundation, Torino, Italy.
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Dec 9;3(12):e0000655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000655. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Symptom-only case definitions are insufficient to discriminate COVID-like illness from acute respiratory infection (ARI) or influenza-like illness (ILI), due to the overlap in case definitions. Our objective was to develop a statistical method that does not rely on case definitions to determine the contribution of influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2 to the ARI burden during periods when both viruses are circulating. Data sources used for testing the approach were weekly ARI syndrome reports from the Infectieradar participatory syndromic surveillance system during the analysis period (the first 25 weeks of 2022, in which SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus co-circulated in the Netherlands) and data from virologically tested ARI (including ILI) patients who consulted a general practitioner in the same period. Estimation of the proportions of ARI attributable to influenza virus, SARS-CoV-2, or another cause was framed as an inference problem, through which all data sources are combined within a Bayesian framework to infer the weekly numbers of ARI reports attributable to each cause. Posterior distributions for the attribution proportions were obtained using Markov Chain Monte-Carlo methods. Application of the approach to the example data sources indicated that, of the total ARI reports (total of 11,312; weekly mean of 452) during the analysis period, the model attributed 35.4% (95% CrI: 29.2-40.0%) and 27.0% (95% CrI: 19.3-35.2%) to influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2, respectively. The proposed statistical model allows the attribution of respiratory syndrome reports from participatory surveillance to either influenza virus or SARS-CoV-2 infection in periods when both viruses are circulating, but comparability of the participatory surveillance and virologically tested populations is important. Portability for use by other countries with established participatory respiratory surveillance systems is an asset.
仅基于症状的病例定义不足以区分新冠样疾病与急性呼吸道感染(ARI)或流感样疾病(ILI),因为病例定义存在重叠。我们的目标是开发一种不依赖病例定义的统计方法,以确定在两种病毒同时传播期间,流感病毒和严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)对ARI负担的贡献。用于测试该方法的数据源包括分析期间(2022年的前25周,SARS-CoV-2和流感病毒在荷兰共同传播)感染监测雷达参与性症状监测系统的每周ARI综合征报告,以及同期咨询全科医生的经病毒学检测的ARI(包括ILI)患者的数据。将归因于流感病毒、SARS-CoV-2或其他原因的ARI比例估计构建为一个推理问题,通过该问题将所有数据源在贝叶斯框架内进行合并,以推断每周归因于每种原因的ARI报告数量。使用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法获得归因比例的后验分布。将该方法应用于示例数据源表明,在分析期间的ARI报告总数(共11312份;每周平均452份)中,模型分别将35.4%(95%可信区间:29.2 - 40.0%)和27.0%(95%可信区间:19.3 - 35.2%)归因于流感病毒和SARS-CoV-2。所提出的统计模型允许在两种病毒同时传播期间,将参与性监测的呼吸道综合征报告归因于流感病毒或SARS-CoV-2感染,但参与性监测人群与经病毒学检测人群的可比性很重要。对于拥有成熟参与性呼吸道监测系统的其他国家而言,该方法的可移植性是一项优势。