Gould Christine E, Carlson Chalise, Wetherell Julie L, Goldstein Mary K, Anker Lauren, Beaudreau Sherry A
Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
JMIR Aging. 2024 Dec 9;7:e56959. doi: 10.2196/56959.
Older veterans with anxiety disorders encounter multiple barriers to receiving mental health services, including transportation difficulties, physical limitations, and limited access to providers trained to work with older persons. To address both accessibility and the shortage of available providers, evidence-based treatments that can be delivered via guided self-management modalities are a potential solution.
This study aims to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a randomized controlled trial of 2 guided self-management interventions. This study compared the treatment effects of these 2 interventions (relaxation and health psychoeducation) on anxiety symptom severity and functioning in older veterans with anxiety disorders. Our exploratory aims examined factors related to home practices and treatment engagement and perceptions of the practices.
Participants were randomized to one of two video-delivered interventions: (1) Breathing, Relaxation, and Education for Anxiety Treatment in the Home Environment (BREATHE)-breathing and progressive relaxation or (2) Healthy Living for Reduced Anxiety-psychoeducation about lifestyle changes. Telephone coaching calls were conducted weekly. Measures of anxiety, depression, and functioning were obtained at baseline, week 4 (end of treatment), week 8, and week 12. Participants completed a semistructured interview at week 12. Analyses included descriptive statistics to summarize measures of intervention engagement; mixed-effects models to characterize symptom change, and qualitative analyses.
Overall, 56 participants (n=48, 86% men; n=23, 41% from ethnic or racial minority groups; mean age 71.36, SD 6.19 y) were randomized. No difference in retention between study arms was found. The Healthy Living group (29/56, 52%) completed significantly more lessons (mean 3.68, SD 0.86) than the BREATHE group (27/56, 48%; mean 2.85, SD 1.43; t=2.60; P=.01) but did not differ in completion of coaching calls. In the BREATHE group, greater baseline anxiety scores (r=-0.41; P=.03) and greater severity of medical comorbidity (r=-0.50; P=.009) were associated with fewer completed practices. There was no effect of intervention on change in total anxiety scores or functioning. For specific anxiety subtypes, Healthy Living produced a greater decline in somatic anxiety compared with BREATHE. Qualitative analyses found barriers to practicing, including difficulty setting time aside to practice, forgetting, or having other activities that interfered with BREATHE practices. Some participants described adapting their practice routine to fit their daily lives; some also used relaxation skills in everyday situations.
These findings suggest that a larger randomized controlled trial of guided self-management approaches to treating late-life anxiety is feasible; however, BREATHE was not effective in reducing anxiety compared with Healthy Living. Possible contributing factors may have been the reliance on a single technique. Progressive relaxation was reported to be enjoyable for most participants, but maintaining home practices was challenging. Those with milder anxiety severity and fewer health problems were better able to adhere to practices.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02400723; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02400723.
患有焦虑症的老年退伍军人在获得心理健康服务方面面临多重障碍,包括交通困难、身体限制以及难以获得受过针对老年人工作培训的服务提供者。为了解决可及性和可用服务提供者短缺的问题,可通过引导式自我管理模式提供的循证治疗是一个潜在的解决方案。
本研究旨在确定两项引导式自我管理干预措施的随机对照试验的可行性和可接受性。本研究比较了这两种干预措施(放松和健康心理教育)对患有焦虑症的老年退伍军人焦虑症状严重程度和功能的治疗效果。我们的探索性目标考察了与家庭练习、治疗参与度以及对这些练习的看法相关的因素。
参与者被随机分配到两种视频提供的干预措施之一:(1)家庭环境中焦虑治疗的呼吸、放松和教育(BREATHE)——呼吸和渐进性放松,或(2)降低焦虑的健康生活——关于生活方式改变的心理教育。每周进行电话辅导。在基线、第4周(治疗结束时)、第8周和第12周获取焦虑、抑郁和功能的测量值。参与者在第12周完成了一次半结构化访谈。分析包括描述性统计以总结干预参与度的测量值;用于描述症状变化的混合效应模型,以及定性分析。
总体而言,56名参与者(n = 48,86%为男性;n = 23,41%来自少数族裔或种族群体;平均年龄71.36岁,标准差6.19岁)被随机分组。各研究组之间在保留率上未发现差异。健康生活组(29/56,52%)完成的课程(平均3.68节,标准差0.86节)显著多于BREATHE组(27/56,48%;平均2.85节,标准差1.43节;t = 2.60;P = 0.01),但在辅导电话的完成情况上没有差异。在BREATHE组中,更高的基线焦虑评分(r = -0.41;P = 0.03)和更高的医疗合并症严重程度(r = -0.50;P = 0.009)与完成的练习较少相关。干预对总焦虑评分或功能变化没有影响。对于特定的焦虑亚型,与BREATHE相比,健康生活使躯体焦虑下降得更多。定性分析发现了练习的障碍,包括难以抽出时间练习、遗忘或有其他干扰BREATHE练习的活动。一些参与者描述了调整他们的练习常规以适应日常生活;一些人还在日常情况下使用放松技巧。
这些发现表明,对治疗晚年焦虑的引导式自我管理方法进行更大规模的随机对照试验是可行的;然而与健康生活相比,BREATHE在减轻焦虑方面并不有效。可能的促成因素可能是对单一技术的依赖。据报告,渐进性放松对大多数参与者来说是令人愉快的,但维持家庭练习具有挑战性。焦虑严重程度较轻且健康问题较少的人更能够坚持练习。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02400723;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02400723