Møller Kjestine Emilie, McLeskey Olivia Wisborg, Rosthøj Susanne, Trbovich Patricia, Grantcharov Teodor, Sorensen Jette Led, Strandbygaard Jeanett
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Dec 9;13(4):e003154. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003154.
The Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) is a cornerstone of ensuring the safety and accuracy of communication among interdisciplinary teams in the operating room. Central to the successful implementation of such a checklist is the concept of psychological safety. Despite the extensive body of research on the checklists' efficacy, the association between healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perceptions of the checklist and their level of psychological safety remains uninvestigated. This study attempts to address this gap by examining how their perceptions of the checklist intersect with their sense of psychological safety.
A cross-sectional survey comprising 25 items was conducted from November 2022 to January 2023 on; Demographics (6 items), the SSC (12 items), and the Psychological Safety Scale (7 items). We invited 125 HCPs from five different professional groups in the operation ward to complete the survey.
Of the 125 asked to participate, 107 responded, and 100 of whom completed the entire survey. The level of psychological safety increased by 1.25 (95 % CI 0.36 to 2.14, p=0.006) per one-point increase of the perception that colleagues listen when checklist items are being reviewed, and increased by 1.1 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.7, p=0.002) per one-point increase in the perception that the checklist enhances interdisciplinary teamwork, and increased by 0.86 (95% CI 0.15 to 1.57, p=0.02) per one-point increase in the perception that the checklist provides structure in the operating room. Conversely, the level of psychological safety decreased by 1.4 (95 % CI 0.5 to 2.3, p=0.004) per one-point increase in the perception that the checklist is time-consuming.
Our findings reveal a significant association between psychological safety levels and perceptions of the SSC. Increased psychological safety was linked to more positive views on the checklist's role in enhancing interdisciplinary teamwork, creating structure and attentiveness among colleagues. While seeing the checklist as time-consuming was associated with a lower psychological safety rating. These results suggest that psychological safety influences how individuals view and engage with patient safety measures like the checklist, highlighting the importance of fostering a supportive environment to optimise safety practice.
手术安全核对表(SSC)是确保手术室跨学科团队之间沟通安全与准确的基石。这种核对表成功实施的核心是心理安全概念。尽管对核对表的有效性已有大量研究,但医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)对核对表的认知与其心理安全水平之间的关联仍未得到研究。本研究试图通过考察他们对核对表的认知如何与他们的心理安全感相互交叉来填补这一空白。
2022年11月至2023年1月进行了一项包含25个项目的横断面调查;人口统计学(6项)、手术安全核对表(12项)和心理安全量表(7项)。我们邀请了手术病房五个不同专业组的125名医疗保健专业人员完成调查。
在被邀请参与的125人中,107人做出回应,其中100人完成了全部调查。在审查核对表项目时,同事倾听的认知每增加1分,心理安全水平提高1.25(95%CI 0.36至2.14,p = 0.006);核对表增强跨学科团队合作的认知每增加1分,心理安全水平提高1.1(95%CI 0.4至1.7,p = 0.002);核对表为手术室提供结构的认知每增加1分,心理安全水平提高0.86(95%CI 0.15至1.57,p = 0.02)。相反,认为核对表耗时的认知每增加1分,心理安全水平降低1.4(95%CI 0.5至2.3,p = 0.004)。
我们的研究结果揭示了心理安全水平与手术安全核对表认知之间的显著关联。心理安全的提高与对核对表在增强跨学科团队合作、在同事间建立结构和专注度方面作用的更积极看法相关。而将核对表视为耗时则与较低的心理安全评分相关。这些结果表明,心理安全会影响个人对像核对表这样的患者安全措施的看法和参与度,凸显了营造支持性环境以优化安全实践的重要性。