Habtie Tesfaye Engdaw, Feleke Sefineh Fenta, Terefe Aregash Birhan, Adisu Molalign Aligaz
Department of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12569-0.
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the compliance, completeness, and key barriers to the successful initiation and implementation of checklists in surgical theaters.Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the included studies. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024589344).Results The review included 13 observational studies conducted globally, encompassing a total of 17,867 participants. The overall compliance rate with the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist was 73% (95% CI: 62-85%). Compliance rates for individual components were 76% for "Sign In," 61% for "Time Out," and 62% for "Sign Out." The overall completeness of checklist implementation was 51%. Factors that improve compliance rate include prior Surgical Safety Checklist exposure, training, a positive work environment, management support, and regular monitoring with feedback. Conversely, barriers such as insufficient staffing, high workloads, lack of checklist ownership, resistance to change, weak audit systems, and rapid staff turnover hinder effective implementation and compliance.Conclusion Despite the importance of Surgical Safety Checklist in improving healthcare outcomes, its overall compliance rate across healthcare settings remains suboptimal, with a notably low completeness rate. This highlights the frequent omission or inconsistent application of critical checklist components. Maximizing the checklist's full potential requires continuous efforts, including sustained support, regular audit, and strong commitment from all stakeholders.Recommendation Policymakers, healthcare administrators, and surgical teams must work together to integrate the checklist into routine workflows, ensure continuous monitoring and support, and foster a culture of safety to improve patient outcomes.
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估手术室中检查表成功启动和实施的依从性、完整性以及关键障碍。方法 本系统评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行,以确保纳入研究的准确性和可靠性。该方案已在PROSPERO(CRD42024589344)注册。结果 该评价纳入了全球范围内开展的13项观察性研究,共涉及17867名参与者。世界卫生组织手术安全检查表的总体依从率为73%(95%CI:62-85%)。各个组成部分的依从率分别为:“签到”76%,“暂停”61%,“签出”62%。检查表实施的总体完整性为51%。提高依从率的因素包括先前接触过手术安全检查表、培训、积极的工作环境、管理支持以及有反馈的定期监测。相反,人员配备不足、工作量大、缺乏检查表所有权、抵制变革、审计系统薄弱以及人员快速更替等障碍阻碍了有效实施和依从性。结论 尽管手术安全检查表对改善医疗结果很重要,但其在各医疗机构中的总体依从率仍不理想,完整性率尤其低。这突出了关键检查表组成部分经常被遗漏或应用不一致的情况。要充分发挥检查表的全部潜力,需要持续努力,包括持续支持、定期审计以及所有利益相关者的坚定承诺。建议 政策制定者、医疗管理人员和手术团队必须共同努力,将检查表纳入常规工作流程,确保持续监测和支持,并营造安全文化以改善患者结局。