Singh Manorama Vijay, Sarfaraz Hasan, Lampl Stephan, Mehta Deepak, Gurunathan Deepa
Department of Prosthodontics, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya Deemed to be University, Deralakatte, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
Department of Oral Implantology, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya Deemed to be University, Deralakatte, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2024 Aug 1;25(8):732-739. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3749.
This study aimed to determine the optimal finish line and material criteria for optimal marginal fit and fracture resistance in endocrowns. The impact of two preparation designs on endocrowns made from computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) lithium disilicate and pre-processed CAD/CAM composite was compared.
In a randomized 3-arm trial involving 42 mandibular molars, two marginal configurations (with and without chamfer finish lines) were evaluated for each material group. Marginal fit was assessed pre- and post-cementation using scanning electron microscope, and fracture resistance was tested with a universal testing machine. Student -test was used to compare within group differences and ANOVA with Tukey test was used to compare intergroup differences. The significance level was set at 0.05.
Edelweiss CAD/CAM blocks demonstrated the least marginal gap pre- and post-cementation, and superior fracture resistance compared to lithium disilicate and HIPC composite resin. Finish lines significantly affected marginal adaptation in all groups. Fracture resistance differences between designs within the same group were not statistically significant.
The CAD/CAM composite proved effective for endocrown restorations, with finish lines impacting marginal adaptation but not fracture resistance. Edelweiss CAD/CAM blocks showed superior performance in both aspects, suggesting their suitability for such restorations.
The study highlights the clinical significance of using Edelweiss CAD/CAM blocks for endocrown restorations, demonstrating superior marginal fit and fracture resistance. Clinicians can enhance restoration longevity by selecting appropriate materials and preparation designs, particularly the use of finish lines, to optimize marginal adaptation without compromising fracture resistance. How to cite this article: Singh MV, Sarfaraz H, Lampl S, et al. Comparative Analysis of Marginal Fit and Fracture Resistance in CAD-CAM Lithium Disilicate and Pre-processed Composite Endocrowns: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(8):732-739.
本研究旨在确定全冠修复体实现最佳边缘适合性和抗折性的最佳终末线和材料标准。比较了两种预备设计对计算机辅助设计与计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)二硅酸锂及预处理CAD/CAM复合材料制成的全冠修复体的影响。
在一项涉及42颗下颌磨牙的随机三臂试验中,对每个材料组评估了两种边缘形态(有和没有切角终末线)。使用扫描电子显微镜在粘固前和粘固后评估边缘适合性,并用万能试验机测试抗折性。采用学生t检验比较组内差异,采用方差分析和Tukey检验比较组间差异。显著性水平设定为0.05。
与二硅酸锂和HIPC复合树脂相比,雪绒花CAD/CAM块在粘固前和粘固后的边缘间隙最小,抗折性更好。终末线对所有组的边缘适应性有显著影响。同一组内不同设计之间的抗折性差异无统计学意义。
CAD/CAM复合材料被证明对全冠修复有效,终末线影响边缘适应性,但不影响抗折性。雪绒花CAD/CAM块在这两个方面均表现出卓越性能,表明其适用于此类修复。
该研究突出了使用雪绒花CAD/CAM块进行全冠修复的临床意义,显示出卓越的边缘适合性和抗折性。临床医生可以通过选择合适的材料和预备设计,特别是使用终末线,在不影响抗折性的情况下优化边缘适应性,从而提高修复体的使用寿命。如何引用本文:Singh MV, Sarfaraz H, Lampl S,等。CAD-CAM二硅酸锂和预处理复合全冠修复体边缘适合性和抗折性的比较分析:一项体外研究。《当代牙科实践杂志》2024;25(8):732-739。