Wayne Max T, Moulton Nathaniel G, Weimholt Cody, Chenna Praveen, Chen Alexander C
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Thorac Cancer. 2025 Jan;16(2):e15502. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.15502. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
Testing for targeting programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but is only approved for use with core biopsy specimens. Endobronchial ultrasound guided miniforceps biopsy (EBUS-MFB) is an approach to obtain core biopsy material but data assessing the ability of EBUS-MFB to adequately test for PD-L1 is lacking. We evaluate the feasibility of EBUS-MFB to acquire adequate tissue for PD-L1 testing and look to compare the quality of specimens between EBUS-MFB and endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) using a standard method of tissue analysis.
Twenty patients with suspected non-small cell lung cancer undergoing bronchoscopy were recruited for enrollment. For each patient with NSCLC diagnosed on rapid onsite pathology with EBUS-TBNA, EBUS-MFB was performed. PD-L1 immunostaining was completed to assess for adequacy. A comparison of tissue collection was performed using the total surface area measured by digital imaging.
Among 20 patients, 65% were male with a mean age of 66 years with a total procedure time of 50 min and an average of 14 biopsy passes per procedure. 15 (75%) patients were diagnosed with NSCLC, and PD-L1 analysis was successfully performed in 12 of the 15 (80%). The mean total tissue area obtained by the MFB technique was 9.757 mm compared to 6.941 mm with TBNA (p = 0.427).
In this feasibility study, EBUS-MFB was successful in performing PD-L1 testing in 80% of patients with NSCLC.
检测程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)是新诊断的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的标准治疗方法,但仅批准用于核心活检标本。支气管内超声引导下微型钳活检(EBUS-MFB)是获取核心活检材料的一种方法,但缺乏评估EBUS-MFB充分检测PD-L1能力的数据。我们评估EBUS-MFB获取足够组织进行PD-L1检测的可行性,并使用标准组织分析方法比较EBUS-MFB和支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检(EBUS-TBNA)之间的标本质量。
招募20例疑似非小细胞肺癌且接受支气管镜检查的患者。对于每例经EBUS-TBNA快速现场病理诊断为NSCLC的患者,均进行EBUS-MFB。完成PD-L1免疫染色以评估是否足够。使用数字成像测量的总表面积对组织采集进行比较。
20例患者中,65%为男性,平均年龄66岁,总操作时间50分钟,每次操作平均活检穿刺14次。15例(75%)患者被诊断为NSCLC,15例中的12例(80%)成功进行了PD-L1分析。MFB技术获得的平均总组织面积为9.757平方毫米,而TBNA为6.941平方毫米(p = 0.427)。
在这项可行性研究中,EBUS-MFB在80%的NSCLC患者中成功进行了PD-L1检测。