McMahon Jake, McInnes Elizabeth, Wan Ching Shan, Straiton Nicola, Lam Louisa, Rodgers Jane, Fulbrook Paul
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
J Clin Nurs. 2025 May;34(5):1866-1877. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17595. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
To understand, from a nursing perspective, factors affecting the use of prophylactic dressings to prevent pressure injuries in acute hospitalised adults.
Pressure injury causes harm to patients and incurs significant costs to health services. Significant emphasis is placed on their prevention. Relatively recently, prophylactic dressings have been promoted to reduce pressure injury development. However, in the acute care setting, information about the clinical use of these dressing is lacking.
Qualitative, descriptive.
Nineteen medical and surgical nurses participated. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was performed using an inductive approach using NVivo software.
Three themes were identified, reflecting factors that influenced and perpetuated indiscriminate use of prophylactic dressings: False sense of security; Convenience and task prioritisation; and Navigating challenges in evidence-based pressure injury prevention.
The findings indicate inconsistent prevention practices, with prophylactic dressings often applied without justification or referral to research-based evidence to guide clinical decision-making. There was a prevailing attitude of 'job done' when a prophylactic dressing was applied.
This study has identified several factors that perpetuate the inappropriate use of prophylactic dressings for pressure injury prevention that may be amenable to organisational change. The findings indicate that nurses often rely on these dressings as a shortcut due to time constraints, which led to missed skin assessments and low-value care. The research can be used to inform the development of clear guidelines on dressings within hospital settings which encourage assessment-based selection for their use, and process-based guidance for their application, skin surveillance, dressing inspection and removal.
The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) reporting guideline was followed.
Neither patients nor the public were directly involved in this study.
从护理角度了解影响急性住院成人使用预防性敷料预防压疮的因素。
压疮会对患者造成伤害,并给医疗服务带来巨大成本。预防压疮受到了高度重视。最近,预防性敷料被推广用于减少压疮的发生。然而,在急性护理环境中,关于这些敷料临床使用的信息却很缺乏。
定性、描述性研究。
19名内科和外科护士参与研究。进行了半结构化访谈,并逐字记录。使用NVivo软件采用归纳法进行主题分析。
确定了三个主题,反映了影响预防性敷料滥用并使其持续存在的因素:安全感错觉;便利性和任务优先级;以及应对循证预防压疮中的挑战。
研究结果表明预防措施不一致,预防性敷料的使用往往没有正当理由,也未参考基于研究的证据来指导临床决策。使用预防性敷料时普遍存在一种“任务完成”的态度。
本研究确定了几个导致预防性敷料在预防压疮方面使用不当且可能因组织变革而得到改善的因素。研究结果表明,由于时间限制,护士经常将这些敷料作为捷径,这导致皮肤评估缺失和低价值护理。该研究可用于为医院制定关于敷料的明确指南提供参考,这些指南鼓励基于评估选择使用敷料,并提供关于敷料应用、皮肤监测、敷料检查和去除的基于流程的指导。
遵循定性研究报告的综合标准(COREQ)报告指南。
患者和公众均未直接参与本研究。