Mersfelder Rachel B, Lwin Cara, Malik Shahid, Badgett Thomas C, Chenard Stephen W, Rekulapelli Akhil, Blette Bryan S, Lawrenz Joshua M, Borinstein Scott C
Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2025 Mar;72(3):e31466. doi: 10.1002/pbc.31466. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Osteosarcoma treatment incorporates chemotherapy and surgery. Resection of the primary tumor usually occurs after induction chemotherapy. Occasionally, scheduling challenges and medical complications result in delay. The goal of this study is to determine if an increased interval between completion of neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection correlates with decreased tumor necrosis and inferior outcomes in children and young adults with osteosarcoma.
DESIGN/METHOD: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 121 patients age less than 40 years diagnosed with osteosarcoma treated at a single tertiary medical center between 2000 and 2022. Inclusion criteria included receipt of two cycles of neoadjuvant methotrexate, cisplatin, and doxorubicin. Association of the interval from completion of induction chemotherapy to resection with tumor necrosis (Spearman's correlation) and outcomes (multivariable Cox hazard regression) were analyzed.
There was no significant correlation between interval length and tumor necrosis. However, patients with an interval greater than 16 days had lower 5-year event-free survival (p = 0.019). Multivariable adjusted analysis of patients with initially localized disease revealed that each day increase in interval length corresponds with a 1.1 times greater hazard of having an event (95% CI: 1.0-1.2; p = 0.016).
Delays in local control were not associated with tumor necrosis. This is consistent with the hypothesis that tumor necrosis is a biologic marker of a tumor's sensitivity to chemotherapy and may not be affected by minor regimen aberrations. However, surgical delay from completion of induction chemotherapy may confer worse outcomes. Longer intervals generally confer worse outcomes in patients with initially localized disease.
背景/目的:骨肉瘤的治疗包括化疗和手术。原发性肿瘤的切除通常在诱导化疗后进行。偶尔,由于日程安排挑战和医疗并发症会导致延迟。本研究的目的是确定在骨肉瘤儿童和年轻成人中,新辅助治疗完成与手术切除之间间隔时间的延长是否与肿瘤坏死减少及预后较差相关。
设计/方法:我们对2000年至2022年在一家单一的三级医疗中心接受治疗的121例年龄小于40岁的骨肉瘤确诊患者进行了回顾性病历审查。纳入标准包括接受两个周期的新辅助甲氨蝶呤、顺铂和阿霉素治疗。分析了从诱导化疗完成到切除的间隔时间与肿瘤坏死(Spearman相关性)和预后(多变量Cox风险回归)之间的关联。
间隔时间长度与肿瘤坏死之间无显著相关性。然而,间隔时间大于16天的患者5年无事件生存率较低(p = 0.019)。对初始局限期疾病患者的多变量调整分析显示,间隔时间长度每增加一天,发生事件的风险就增加1.1倍(95%置信区间:1.0 - 1.2;p = 0.016)。
局部控制的延迟与肿瘤坏死无关。这与肿瘤坏死是肿瘤对化疗敏感性的生物学标志物且可能不受微小方案偏差影响的假设一致。然而,诱导化疗完成后手术延迟可能导致更差的预后。在初始局限期疾病患者中,间隔时间越长通常预后越差。