Monzo Luca, Bresso Emmanuel, Dickstein Kenneth, Pitt Bertram, Cleland John G F, Anker Stefan D, Lam Carolyn S P, Mehra Mandeep R, van Veldhuisen Dirk J, Greenberg Barry, Zannad Faiez, Girerd Nicolas
Université de Lorraine, INSERM, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques Plurithématique 1433, Inserm U1116, CHRU de Nancy and F-CRIN INI-CRCT, Nancy, France.
Department of Cardiology, University of Bergan, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 Dec 10. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3547.
Patients experiencing ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) represent a diverse group. We hypothesize that machine learning clustering can help separate distinctive patient phenotypes, paving the way for personalized management.
A total of 8591 ischaemic HFrEF patients pooled from the EPHESUS and CAPRICORN trials (64 ± 12 years; 28% women) were included in this analysis. Clusters were identified using both clinical and biological variables. Association between clusters and the composite of (i) heart failure hospitalization or all-cause death, (ii) cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization or all-cause death, and (iii) major adverse CV events was assessed. The derived algorithm was applied in the COMMANDER-HF trial (n = 5022) for external validation. Five clinical distinctive clusters were identified: Cluster 1 (n = 2161) with the older patients, higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation and previous CV events; Cluster 2 (n = 1376) with the higher prevalence of older hypertensive women and smoking habit; Cluster 3 (n = 1157) with the higher prevalence of diabetes and peripheral artery disease; Cluster 4 (n = 2073) with relatively younger patients, mostly men and with the higher left ventricular ejection fraction; Cluster 5 (n = 1824) with the younger patients and lower CV events burden. Cluster membership was efficiently predicted by a random forest algorithm. Clusters were significantly associated with outcomes in derivation and validation datasets, with Cluster 1 having the highest risk, and Cluster 4 the lowest. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist benefit on CV hospitalization or all-cause death was magnified in clusters with the lowest risk of events (Clusters 2 and 4).
Clustering reveals distinct risk subgroups in the heterogeneous array of ischaemic HFrEF patients. This classification, accessible online, could enhance future outcome predictions for ischaemic HFrEF cases.
射血分数降低的缺血性心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者群体具有多样性。我们假设机器学习聚类有助于区分不同的患者表型,为个性化管理铺平道路。
本分析纳入了从EPHESUS和CAPRICORN试验中汇总的8591例缺血性HFrEF患者(64±12岁;28%为女性)。使用临床和生物学变量确定聚类。评估聚类与以下复合终点之间的关联:(i)心力衰竭住院或全因死亡;(ii)心血管(CV)住院或全因死亡;(iii)主要不良心血管事件。将推导的算法应用于COMMANDER-HF试验(n = 5022)进行外部验证。确定了五个临床特征聚类:聚类1(n = 2161),患者年龄较大,房颤患病率较高且既往有心血管事件;聚类2(n = 1376),老年高血压女性和吸烟习惯的患病率较高;聚类3(n = 1157),糖尿病和外周动脉疾病的患病率较高;聚类4(n = 2073),患者相对年轻,大多为男性且左心室射血分数较高;聚类5(n = 1824),患者较年轻且心血管事件负担较低。随机森林算法能有效预测聚类归属。聚类与推导和验证数据集中的结局显著相关,聚类1风险最高,聚类4风险最低。盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂对心血管住院或全因死亡的益处,在事件风险最低的聚类(聚类2和聚类4)中更为显著。
聚类揭示了缺血性HFrEF患者异质性群体中的不同风险亚组。这种可在线获取的分类方法,可增强未来对缺血性HFrEF病例结局的预测。