• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区域医疗资源配置与决策:评估三阶段超效率DEA模型的有效性

Regional healthcare resource allocation and decision-making: Evaluating the effectiveness of the three-stage super-efficiency DEA model.

作者信息

Liu Ying, Mai Lanxian, Huang Feng, Zeng Zhiyu

机构信息

School Of Public Policy And Management., Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, Guangxi, China.

School Of Information and Management, Guangxi Meidical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Nov 12;10(23):e40312. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40312. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40312
PMID:39654734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11626734/
Abstract

This study addresses the challenge of achieving a more rational allocation of medical resources at the regional level, using Guangxi Province, China, as a case study. A three-stage super-efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model is employed to assess and analyze the effectiveness of resource allocation. The research methodology involves identifying input, output, and environmental variable indicators to construct a healthcare resource allocation index system. The indicator data are processed using Excel software. The three-stage super-efficiency DEA model is then applied to evaluate the healthcare system in Guangxi Province, focusing on Pure Technical Efficiency Change (PEC), Scale Efficiency Change (SEC), Efficiency Change (EC), Technological Change (TC), and Total Factor Productivity (TFP). Finally, the Malmquist index method is utilized to measure and dynamically analyze the efficiency of healthcare resource allocation. The study's results show that, from a static perspective, the average comprehensive efficiency is 1.067 before adjustment and 1.054 after adjustment, indicating relatively high overall efficiency in healthcare resource allocation in Guangxi Province. However, environmental factors and random errors have led to an overestimation of healthcare resource allocation efficiency, which the three-stage super-efficiency DEA model effectively corrects. Additionally, the average SEC and PEC values are 0.997 and 0.998, respectively, both below 1. This indicates that both scale efficiency and pure technical efficiency contribute to a decline in technical efficiency. Based on the results of the sensitivity analysis, the conclusions regarding the efficiency of healthcare resource allocation in Guangxi are deemed highly reliable. Despite the influence of uncertain factors, the model consistently provides stable and coherent assessment results in most scenarios. Therefore, special attention is needed to improve scale efficiency in healthcare resource allocation within the region, alongside enhancing management and technological capabilities in the healthcare sector. Overall, this study provides valuable reference and guidance for researchers and practitioners in related fields and offers scientific decision support for healthcare resource allocation.

摘要

本研究以中国广西壮族自治区为例,探讨了在区域层面实现医疗资源更合理配置的挑战。采用三阶段超效率数据包络分析(DEA)模型来评估和分析资源配置的有效性。研究方法包括确定投入、产出和环境变量指标,以构建医疗资源配置指标体系。指标数据使用Excel软件进行处理。然后应用三阶段超效率DEA模型对广西壮族自治区的医疗系统进行评估,重点关注纯技术效率变化(PEC)、规模效率变化(SEC)、效率变化(EC)、技术变化(TC)和全要素生产率(TFP)。最后,利用Malmquist指数法来衡量和动态分析医疗资源配置效率。研究结果表明,从静态角度看,调整前平均综合效率为1.067,调整后为1.054,表明广西壮族自治区医疗资源配置的总体效率相对较高。然而,环境因素和随机误差导致了医疗资源配置效率的高估,而三阶段超效率DEA模型有效地纠正了这一问题。此外,平均SEC值和PEC值分别为0.997和0.998,均低于1。这表明规模效率和纯技术效率都导致了技术效率的下降。基于敏感性分析的结果,关于广西医疗资源配置效率的结论被认为高度可靠。尽管存在不确定因素的影响,但该模型在大多数情况下始终提供稳定且连贯的评估结果。因此,需要特别关注提高该地区医疗资源配置中的规模效率,同时提升医疗部门的管理和技术能力。总体而言,本研究为相关领域的研究人员和从业者提供了有价值的参考和指导,并为医疗资源配置提供了科学的决策支持。

相似文献

1
Regional healthcare resource allocation and decision-making: Evaluating the effectiveness of the three-stage super-efficiency DEA model.区域医疗资源配置与决策:评估三阶段超效率DEA模型的有效性
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 12;10(23):e40312. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40312. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
2
Efficiency analysis of oral health resource allocation in public medical institutions in Yunnan Province at the end of the 13th five-year plan in China.中国“十三五”期末云南省公立医疗机构口腔卫生资源配置效率分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 1;25(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05839-0.
3
The efficiency of health resource allocation and its influencing factors: evidence from the super efficiency slack based model-Tobit model.卫生资源配置效率及其影响因素研究——基于超效率 SBM-Tobit 模型的实证分析。
Int Health. 2023 May 2;15(3):326-334. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihac054.
4
Study on the efficiency of health resource allocation in the western region of China-based on three-stage DEA and Tobit regression analysis.基于三阶段DEA和Tobit回归分析的中国西部地区卫生资源配置效率研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 1;25(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12630-y.
5
Health expenditure efficiency in rural China using the super-SBM model and the Malmquist productivity index.中国农村卫生支出效率的超 SBM 模型与 Malmquist 生产力指数分析
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jul 19;18(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1003-5.
6
Efficiency analysis of primary health care resources: DEA and Tobit regression evidence from village clinics in Jiangsu Province.基层医疗卫生资源效率分析:来自江苏省村卫生室的数据包络分析和托宾回归证据
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 23;13:1515532. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1515532. eCollection 2025.
7
Measuring productivity of healthcare services under environmental constraints: evidence from China.在环境约束下衡量医疗服务的生产率:来自中国的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 22;20(1):673. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05496-9.
8
Study on the allocation efficiency of medical and health resources in Hainan Province: Based on the super-efficiency SBM-Malmquist model.海南省医疗卫生资源配置效率研究:基于超效率 SBM-Malmquist 模型。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0294774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294774. eCollection 2024.
9
Spatial effects of township health centers' health resource allocation efficiency in China.中国乡镇卫生院卫生资源配置效率的空间效应。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 16;12:1420867. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1420867. eCollection 2024.
10
Resource allocation efficiency in 68 county-level traditional Chinese medicine hospitals in China: a data envelopment analysis.中国 68 家县级中医医院的资源配置效率:数据包络分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 29;14(10):e088462. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088462.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the operational efficiency of the compact urban medical group in Qiqihar based on the three-stage DEA and Malmquist index model.基于三阶段DEA和Malmquist指数模型评估齐齐哈尔市紧密型城市医疗集团的运营效率
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 18;13:1636769. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1636769. eCollection 2025.
2
Study on the efficiency of health resource allocation in the western region of China-based on three-stage DEA and Tobit regression analysis.基于三阶段DEA和Tobit回归分析的中国西部地区卫生资源配置效率研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 1;25(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12630-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Study on the allocation efficiency of medical and health resources in Hainan Province: Based on the super-efficiency SBM-Malmquist model.海南省医疗卫生资源配置效率研究:基于超效率 SBM-Malmquist 模型。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0294774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294774. eCollection 2024.
2
The impact of climate change and production technology heterogeneity on China's agricultural total factor productivity and production efficiency.气候变化和生产技术异质性对中国农业全要素生产率及生产效率的影响
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 10;907:168027. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168027. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
3
Evaluating the efficiency of primary health care institutions in China: an improved three-stage data envelopment analysis approach.
评价中国基层医疗机构的效率:一种改进的三阶段数据包络分析方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 15;23(1):995. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09979-3.
4
Efficiency and optimization of government service resource allocation in a cloud computing environment.云计算环境下政府服务资源分配的效率与优化
J Cloud Comput (Heidelb). 2023;12(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13677-023-00400-2. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
5
Energy efficiency evaluation, changing trends and determinants of energy productivity growth across South Asian countries: SBM-DEA and Malmquist approach.南亚国家能源效率评估、变化趋势及能源生产率增长决定因素:SBM-DEA 和 Malmquist 方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(8):19890-19906. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23484-w. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
6
Equity and efficiency of public hospitals' health resource allocation in Guangdong Province, China.中国广东省公立医院卫生资源配置的公平与效率。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Sep 22;21(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01741-1.
7
The efficiency of health resource allocation and its influencing factors: evidence from the super efficiency slack based model-Tobit model.卫生资源配置效率及其影响因素研究——基于超效率 SBM-Tobit 模型的实证分析。
Int Health. 2023 May 2;15(3):326-334. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihac054.
8
Ethics-by-design: efficient, fair and inclusive resource allocation using machine learning.设计中的伦理:利用机器学习进行高效、公平且包容的资源分配
J Law Biosci. 2022 Apr 28;9(1):lsac012. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsac012. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
9
Resource allocation in the Covid-19 health crisis: are Covid-19 preventive measures consistent with the Rule of Rescue?新冠疫情健康危机中的资源配置:新冠预防措施是否符合援救规则?
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Dec;24(4):487-492. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10045-0. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
10
Health resource allocation among indigenous peoples from the right to health and health capability approaches: The case of P'urhépecha people.从健康权和健康能力方法看原住民的卫生资源分配:以普韦布洛人为例。
Glob Public Health. 2022 Jun;17(6):986-1001. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1888387. Epub 2021 Feb 24.